Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:38:10.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Duelling and Militarism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

It is not the object of this paper to suggest that there is any historical foundation for the association of a social or even a national practice of duelling with the more recent political manifestation, which is usually defined according to our individual political beliefs; far less is it my intention to express any opinion of my own on the advantages or evils of a resort to arms as a means of settling the differences that arise between individuals or nations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1917

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 166 note 1 The Times, 10 27, 1916.Google Scholar It is significant that the first instance of the use of the word in the ‘New English Dictionary’ from the Daily Telegraph of 04 28, 1864Google Scholar (in connection with Garibaldi) speaks of ‘an army yet untainted with that disease of modern times known under the sinister name of Militarism,’ and the second instance, in 1868, speaks of ‘Prussian militarism,’ but Millingen in his History of Duels (1841)Google Scholar, has: ‘Militarism is the child of Feudalism.’

page 167 note 1 Cf. Corpus Juris Canonici (1747), i. 389.Google Scholar

page 168 note 1 Plutarch's Lives, ‘Marcellus’ (Clough, 's ed. Appendix ii. 239 and 244).Google Scholar

page 168 note 2 Selden, , Table-Talk, p. 147.Google ScholarCf. Paletta, F., Le Ordalie (1890), passim.Google Scholar

page 170 note 1 Gibbon, , Decline and Fall (ed. Bury), iv. 127 and 128.Google Scholar

page 170 note 2 Church, F. J.'s translation (1879), p. 63.Google Scholar

page 171 note 1 Several eminent scholars whom the author has consulted on the subject are unable to throw any light on the devolution of the custom described by Jordanes. Cf. Hodgkin, , Italy, i. 96.Google Scholar

page 172 note 1 Superstition and Force (1892), Chap. ii. p. 114Google Scholar, ‘Origin of the Judicial Duel.’

page 172 note 2 Turner, Sharon, Hist, of Anglo-Saxons, ii. 269.Google Scholar

page 172 note 3 Phillpotts, B., Kindred and Clan, p. 6.Google Scholar

page 173 note 1 The intervention of the Crown in the duel of the Dukes of Hereford and Norfolk (1398) is well known.

page 175 note 1 See Worke for Cutlers (Camb. Univ. Press, 1904) for facsimile of proclamation (Soc. of Antiq.), and pp. 30 and 8385.Google Scholar

page 175 note 2 ProfFirth, C. H.'s Oliver Cromwell (Putnam Sons, 1900), p. 350.Google Scholar See also his ‘A Restoration Duel,’ Scottish Hist. Review, 10 1905.Google Scholar

page 176 note 1 Lavisse, , Hist., V. iv. 357.Google Scholar

page 177 note 1 Essays upon Several Moral Subjects, 7th ed., 1732.Google Scholar

page 177 note 2 Basnage, , De Singulari Certamine, ch. xxvii.Google Scholar; Alciatus, A., De Singulari Certamine… in materia Duelli (1543, Lugd. Giunta)Google Scholar; Béraudière, La, Du Combat de Seul à Seul (pt. ii. eh. vii. p. 16)Google Scholar is of Brantôme's opinion.

page 178 note 1 Essai sur le Duel, Paris, 8vo, 1836Google Scholar (full translation into German by C. von L. Karlsruhe, 1888, fifty yeais after its promulgation).

page 178 note 2 Histoire de la Civilisation Contemporaine de France.

page 178 note 3 Recollections and Anecdotes, 17281773.Google Scholar

page 180 note 1 Vide ProfessorSharpe, , ‘The Making of a Gentleman in Germany,’ Contemp. Review, 10 1916.Google Scholar

page 181 note 1 Letter to A. F. S., 12 10, 1916.Google Scholar

page 181 note 2 So called from the ‘Measurement’ of the distance between the combatants.

page 181 note 3 Paulsen, Fr., The German Universities, trans. Perry, E. D., 1895, p. 377Google Scholar; and SirKnowles, Lees, A Day with Corps-Students in Germany.Google Scholar

page 181 note 4 ‘Life of Lord Brougham,’ in Lives of the Chancellors, iv. 343.Google Scholar

page 181 note 5 See De Quincey's article on ‘Casuistry.’

page 182 note 1 1 & 2 Vict., c. 85.

page 182 note 2 9 Geo. I, c. 2.

page 182 note 3 9 Geo. IV, c. 21.

page 182 note 4 43 Geo. III, c. 58.

page 183 note 1 Bentham's influence can be perhaps even better measured from his private correspondence (e.g. with the Duke of Wellington) than from his public utterances (see Index to Bowring's edition of his works).

page 183 note 2 For this subject see especially Capt. H. James's Regimental Companion and Collection of Charges, &c., extracted from the records of the Judge Advocate-General's Office (1820), and The Letters of Queen Victoria, edited by Benson, A. C. and Esher, Lord, i. 450 and 485.Google Scholar