Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
WHEN in 1629–30 Rubens gave James I his conventional apotheosis on the Banqueting House ceiling, he also, more originally, depicted his reign's major achievements. Two stood out: the general benefits of James's rule, peace and plenty; and, given pride of place, the Union of England and Scotland.
1 Parry, G., The Golden Age Restor'd: The Culture of the Stuart Court, 1603–42 (Manchester, 1981), 32–7Google Scholar.
2 Galloway, B., The Union of England and Scotland, 1603–1608 (Edinburgh, 1986)Google Scholar; Russell, C., ‘Parliamentary History in Perspective, 1604–1629’, History, lxi (1976), 1–27, esp. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Levack, B. P., ‘Towards a more Perfect Union: England, Scotland and the Constitution’, in Malament, B. (ed.), After the Reformation: Essays in Honour of J. H. Hexter (Manchester, 1980), 57–74Google Scholar; Willson, D. H., ‘King James I and Anglo-Scottish Unity’, in Aiken, W. A. and Henning, B. D. (eds.), Conflict in Stuart England: Essays in Honour of Wallace Notestein (1960), 41–55Google Scholar.
3 Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 1Google Scholar.
4 Aston, T., ed., Crisis in Europe 1560–1660 (1965), esp. 107–9, 115–16Google Scholar; Parker, G. and Smith, L. M. (eds.), The General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century (1978), esp. 17, 57–73Google Scholar.
5 Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, iii (1578–1585), 322–3Google Scholar; vi (1599–1604), 203, 207–8; Calendar of State Papers Scottish, xiii (1597–1603), 723Google Scholar, and index sub ‘Chamber faction’. Cf. the last adult male to rule before James, and the political importance of his entourage; e.g. Starkey, David, The Reign of Henry VIII: Personalities and Politics (1985)Google Scholar.
6 The Letters of Philip Gawdy, ed. Jeayes, I. H. (Roxburghe Club, 1906), 130–1Google Scholar; H.M.C., Salisbury, xv (1603), 10, 19, 28Google Scholar; H.M.C., Portland, ix. 129Google Scholar. Public Record Office, Lord Steward's Dept. LS 13/168, fo. 57r.
7 Raleigh and Sir John Fortescue lost their offices to Scotsmen for having advocated their exclusion. Munden, R. C., ‘The Defeat of Sir John Fortescue: Court versus Country at the Hustings?’, E.H.R., xciii (1978), 811–16, esp. 814 n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Public Record Office French Transcripts, P.R.O. 31/3/35, Beaumont to Henri IV (1 and 8 Apr., 1603); LS 13/168, fo. 49r, 16 Apr.
8 Both Lord Chancellor and Lord Treasurer now had Scots second-in-commands. B.L. Add. MS 11, 402, fo. 88: Acts of the Privy Council, xxxii (1601–1604), 497Google Scholar. Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 17–18Google Scholar.
9 P.R.O. 31/3/35, Beaumont to Villeroy, 7 May 1603; Calendar of State Papers Venetian, x (1603–1607), 33Google Scholar; cf. Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 18Google Scholar.
10 Letters of Gawdy, ed. Jeayes, , 130–1Google Scholar; The Memoirs of Robert Carey, ed. Mares, F. H. (Oxford, 1972), 65–6Google Scholar.
11 The places of the 50 Gentlemen Pensioners (who waited quarterly in the Presence Chamber) were also to be split between the nations as vacancies occurred among the existing band.
12 P.R.O. 31/3/35, Beaumont to Villeroy, 17 May 1603; CSP Venetian, x (1603–1607), 33Google Scholar.
13 Willson, D. H., James VI and I (1956), 195Google Scholar.
14 Aikin, Lucy, Memoirs of the Court of King James I (2 vols., 1822), i. 111Google Scholar.
15 B.L., Harley MS 589, fo. 197V, §2; cf. Lodge, E., The Life of Sir Julius Caesar… (1827), 23Google Scholar for Caesar's valuation on access to the Withdrawing Chamber.
16 P.R.O., State Papers Domestic, SP14/119/99, Locke to Carleton, 16 Feb. 1621.
17 Stone, L., The Crisis of the Aristocracy 1558–1641 (Oxford, 1965), 470–6, 774–6Google Scholar. Of 29 individuals receiving 75% of all crown patronage in his period, 10 were Gentlemen of James's Bedchamber: of 9 receiving 45% of it all, 6 were of the Bedchamber.
18 , S. J. and Watts, Susan J., From Border to Middle Shire: Northumberland 1586–1625 (Leicester, 1975), 133–4, 148–9Google Scholar; Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 15–16, 84–6Google Scholar.
19 Memoirs of Carey, ed. Mares, , 66Google Scholar, a dual appointment at the Queen's suit soon after her arrival (in late June). It was uncertain in June that parliament would not be able to meet that winter (due to plague); arrangements for the coronation were only finalised on 6 July. It was usual for a new monarch to meet parliament as soon as possible. Akrigg, G. P. V., Jacobean Pageant (1962), 23, 29Google Scholar.
20 Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 20Google Scholar.
21 Notestein, W., The House of Commons, 1604–1610 (New Haven, 1971), 79–85Google Scholar (quotation from p. 85).
22 Munden, R., ‘James I and “the growth of mutual distrust”: King, Commons and Reform, 1603–1604’, in Sharpe, K., ed., Faction and Parliament (Oxford, 1978), 71Google Scholar, citing CSP Venetian, x (1603–1607), 151Google Scholar; H.M.C., Portland, ix. 11–13Google Scholar.
23 Notestein, , House of Commons, 79–85Google Scholar, esp. 79, 81, 82—but cf. Galloway, , Union, 20, 22Google Scholar; Levack, B. P., ‘The Proposed Union of English and Scottish Law in the Seventeenth Century’, Juridical Review, xx (1975), 100Google Scholar; Munden, in Sharpe, (ed.), Faction and Parliament, 62–5Google Scholar.
24 Cf. Rabb, T. K., ‘Sir Edwin Sandys and the Parliament of 1604’, American Historical Review, lxix (1964), 646–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Stone, L., Family and Fortune (Oxford, 1972), 214–15Google Scholar on c. 1605 as a possible date for his conversion; respective entries in D.N.B. on their common early involvement with Virginia.
25 Munden, in Sharpe, (ed.), Faction and Parliament, 64Google Scholar.
26 CSP Venetian, x (1603–1607), 165, 168Google Scholar (26 June/6 July, 4/14 July 1604); H.M.C., Gawdy, 92–3, 7Google Scholar (prectior 27) June 1604. Akrigg, G. P. V., Shakespeare and the Earl of Southampton (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), 140–2Google Scholar. Lionel Sharpe, once chaplain to Essex and now to the king, was sufficiently concerned, not least to distance himself from his former patrons, that on the 26th—after Southampton's release—he organised gentlemen about London to band together to protect the king's person, and give their names to Sir Thomas Erskine, Groom of the Stool and Captain of the Guard, in the interests of Anglo-Scottish brotherhood. Sharpe was himself examined. CSP Domestic, xii (Additional 1580–1625), 482–6Google Scholar; H.M.C., Salisbury, xvi (1604), 157, 30 June 1604Google Scholar.
27 Stone, L., Family and Fortune, 219–22Google Scholar and Crisis of the Aristocracy, 475. Southampton's restored lands explain the apparent size of his gains; other patronage probably reflected his financial need—wealthier Essexians like Rutland received nothing. Trevor-Roper, H. R., The Gentry (Ec.H.R. Supplement No. 1, London, 1953), 35Google Scholar, exaggerates how far former Essexians were taken on board at James's accession by the ‘Cecilians’ and the ‘Scots’.
28 P.R.O. LS 13/168, fos. 77r–79r, fo. 102r; CSP Venetian, xi (1607–1610), 206Google Scholar; B.L. Egerton MS 2026, fo. 23. Hunting: Hatfield MSS 278/3 [British Library microfilm], sub 14 Feb. 1604; P.R.O. SP14/13/8 (1605); H.M.C., Salisbury, xviii (1606), 270Google Scholar. Akrigg, , Shakespeare and Southampton, 144–5Google Scholar.
29 B.L. Add MS 38, 139, fo. 104V, Queen Anne's Council; fo. 186v gives his fee, £10 p.a.; Gardiner, S. R., The History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War (10 vols., 1883–1884), iii. 68–9Google Scholar.
30 Notestein, , House of Commons 1604–1610, 180–1Google Scholar; Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 79–81, 94–6Google Scholar.
31 Journals of the House of Commons (1803), i. 333Google Scholar; Spedding, J. (ed.), The Letters and Life of Sir Francis Bacon (7 vols., 1861–1874), iii. 306–7, 311Google Scholar; Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 104–5Google Scholar.
32 Levack, , ‘Towards a more Perfect Union’, in Malament, (ed.), After the Reformation, 66, 68Google Scholar. Notestein, , House of Commons, 231–5Google Scholar; Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 112–13—Sandys was abetted in the scheme by Southampton's other great Commons collaborator Sir Henry NevilleGoogle Scholar.
33 Ambassades de Monsieur de la Boderie en Angleterre, 1606–1611 (5 vols., Paris, 1750), ii. 199–200Google Scholar (de la Boderie to de Puisieux, 2 May 1607); Boderie also said James reproached Pembroke and the Scot lord Balfour of Burley; Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 105Google Scholar.
34 Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 142–3Google Scholar.
35 P.R.O., Declared Account of the Treasurer of the Chamber, E351/543, memb. 174r; Speech of 31 Mar. 1607 in James's, Workes (1616), 514–15Google Scholar, when James plainly told the Commons that all his Scots had now been promoted and provided for; H.M.C., Salisbury, xx (1608), 269Google Scholar, James to Salisbury, 23 Nov. 1608.
36 Levack, , ‘Proposed Union of English and Scots Law’, Juridical Review, xx (1975), 108–9Google Scholar; Galloway, , Union of England and Scotland, 150Google Scholar; CSP Venetian, xi (1607–1610), 137Google Scholar. Cf. Foster, E. R., Proceedings in Parliament, 1610 (2 vols., New Haven, 1966), ii. 4–5Google Scholar.
37 The Letters of John Chamberlain, ed. McLure, N. E. (2 vols., Philadelphia, 1939), i. 238 (11 Nov. 1606), 241 (6 Feb. 1607)Google Scholar.
38 Speech of 21 Mar. 1610, in Workes (1616), 540, 542.
39 H.M.C., Portland, ix. 113Google Scholar.
40 Foster, , Proceedings in Parliament, 1610, ii. 344 (23 Nov. 1610)Google Scholar; cf. H.M.C., Salisbury, xxi (1609–1612), 265Google Scholar, James to Salisbury, 6 Dec. 1610.
41 Speech of 31 Mar. 1607, in Workes (1616), 519.
42 Calendar of State Papers Domestic, ix (1611–1618), 5Google Scholar; H.M.C., Downshire, iii. 20Google Scholar.
43 P.R.O. SP14/77/42, 22 June 1614, Sir Charles Cornwallis to James; cf./43 His speech formed the basis for Hoskins's: he explained that he had wanted no Scots removed, but rather English taken in gradually as replacements to level the numbers. Moir, T. L., The Addled Parliament of 1614 (Oxford, 1958), 138Google Scholar.
44 Roberts, C. and Duncan, O., ‘The Parliamentary Undertaking of 1614’, E.H.R., xciii (1978), esp. 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
45 Munden in Sharpe (ed.), Faction and Parliament, passim: Goodman, G., The Court of King James I, ed. Brewer, J. S. (2 vols., 1839), i. 21, 40–1Google Scholar; Letters of Chamberlain, i. 259; Parliamentary Debates in 1610, ed. Gardiner, S. R. (Camden 1st ser. lxxxi, 1862), 167Google Scholar: P.R.O. SP14/58/26, Lake to Salisbury, 21 Nov. 1610; Letters of Chamberlain, i. 358–9 (17 07 1612)Google Scholar; H.M.C., Mar & Kellie Supplement, 55 (27 10 1613)Google Scholar.
46 CSP Venetian, xi (1607–1610), 125Google Scholar; xii (1610–13), 135.
47 Goodman, , Court of King James I, i. 215Google Scholar; Roberts, and Duncan, , ‘Parliamentary Undertaking of 1614’, E.H.R., xciii (1978), 485–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; James, Mervyn, Family, Lineage and Civil Society: A Study of Society, Politics and Mentality in the Durham Region, 1500–1640 (Oxford, 1974), 67–8Google Scholar. The government of Scotland from the English court in general hinged on Dunbar between 1603 and 1611; thereafter, it seems that Carr's power has been undervalued. Lee, M., Government by Pen (Urbana, Illinois, 1980), esp. 121, 147Google Scholar.
48 Akrigg, , Jacobean Pageant, 51–4Google Scholar; Crisis of the Aristocracy, 247, 249–50 on duels; Letters of Chamberlain, i. 597, 599 on the Scots' solidarity against Somerset; H.M.C., Mar & Kellie Supplement, 60 (19 04 1615)Google Scholar.
49 Lockyer, R., Buckingham: The Life and Political Career of George Villiers, First Duke of Buckingham, 1592–1628 (1981), 16–17Google Scholar; Gardiner, , History of England…, ii. 318Google Scholar.
50 H.M.C., Mar & Kellie, 84, James, to Mar, , 16 05 1618Google Scholar; Stone, , Crisis of the Aristocracy, 475–6Google Scholar; Letters of Chamberlain, ii. 297, 441–2; Lee, , Government by Pen, 212–13Google Scholar; H.M.C., Mar & Kellie Supplement, 193Google Scholar.
51 On Buckingham's power in England, Lockyer, Buckingham, chs. i–vi; and see his procurement of the royal signature in P.R.O., Signet Office Registers of King's Bills, S.O. 3/6–3/8, passim.
52 Williams, P., The Tudor Régime (Oxford, 1979), 427, 454–6Google Scholar. Cf. Commons Journals, i. 309 (15 05 1606)Google Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., ‘Office Holding as a Factor in English History’, History, xliv (1959), 232, 240Google Scholar and The King's Servants: The Civil Service of Charles 1,1625—1642 (1974), ch. 3 and p. 159.
53 Pegge, S., Curialia (5 Parts, London, 1782–1806), Pt. iii. 28Google Scholar; Huydts, G., ‘Le Premier Chambellan des Dues de Bourgogne’, in Mélanges d' Histoires ojferts à Henri Pirenne (2 vols., Brussels, 1926), i. 263–70Google Scholar; Armstrong, C. A. J., ‘The Golden Age of Burgundy’, in Dickens, A. G. (ed.), The Courts of Europe (1977), 61, 63, 70Google Scholar.
54 Myers, A. R. (ed.), The Household of Edward IV (Manchester, 1959), 108, 127 on Knights and Esquires of the HouseholdGoogle Scholar; Starkey, David, ‘The Age of the Household’, in Medcalf, S. (ed.), The Later Middle Ages (1981), 263Google Scholar, and passim.
55 Nichols, J., The Progresses, Processions and Magnificent Festivities of King James I… (4 vols., 1828), i. 125–6Google Scholar.
56 Workes (1616), 517.
57 CSP Venetian, xi (1607–1610), 137, 4 June 1608Google Scholar; xii (1610–13), 142, 4 May 1611, Arundel and Rochester; Letters of Chamberlain, i. 597, 599 for Knollys, and Fenton, in 1615Google Scholar.
58 Speech of 21 Mar. 1610 in Workes (1616), 529.
59 E.g. P.R.O. 31/3/35, Beaumont to Villeroy, n.d., follows letter of 24 May 1603 in vol.; Ambassades de Monsieur de la Boderie en Angleterre, v. 510– 11 (9 12 1610)Google Scholar.
60 CSP Venetian, x (1603–1607), 293, 11/21 Nov. 1605Google Scholar. Wormald, J., ‘Gunpowder, Treason, and Scots’, Journal of British Studies, xxiv (1985), 141–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
61 CSP Venetian, x (1603–1607), 304, 22 Dec. 1605Google Scholar.
62 Wormald, J., ‘James VI and I—Two Kings or One?’, History, lxviii (1983), passimGoogle Scholar; cf. Willson, , James VI and I, 250–7Google Scholar.
63 Cf. Russell, C., Parliaments and English Politics, 1621–1629 (Oxford, 1979), 10 and n. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The question suggests itself whether Spanish government might not have benefited from more than one valido to deal with the king's various dominions (particularly Portugal before 1640).