Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:42:01.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV. Detector Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

J. Tinbergen

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is little doubt that array detectors of some kind will eventually take over from the single-pixel detectors now used for precise work. The takeover, however, is a gradual process; more and more problems are encountered as the required precision is raised. Very broadly speaking, the best array detector practice has now reached 0.01 mag in photometry and 0.1% in polarimetry (0.001 and 0.005% respectively for single detectors). Whenever this precision of the array detectors is sufficient and the multiplex advantage vital to the programme comtemplated, the array detectors are the indicated path to progress (see, for instance, Ref. 1).

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , 1985 , pp. 265 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985

References

1. Penny, A.J., Gemini no. 7, p. 5, 1983 and no. 12, p. 1, 1981.Google Scholar
2. Wynne, C.S., Worswick, S.P., Lowne, CM. and Jorden, P.R., Observatory 1O 4, 23, 1981.Google Scholar
3. Blouke, M.M., Janesick, J.R., Hall, J.E., Cowens, M.W., May, P.J., Opt. Eng. 22, 607, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Solid State Imagers for Astronomy, Proc. S.P.I.E. 290, 1981.Google Scholar
5. Instrumentation in Astronomy IV, Proc. S.P.I.E. 331, 1982.Google Scholar
6. Instrumentation in Astronomy V, Proc. S.P.I.E. 445, 1984.Google Scholar
7. Hall, P. and MacKay, C.D. M.N.R.A.S. 210, 979, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ratnatunga, K.U. and Newell, E.B., J. Astron, 89, 176, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. McGraw, J.T., Stockman, H.S. Angel, J.R.P., Epps, H., Williams, T., Opt. Eng. 23, 210, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Bull, . Amer. Astron. Soc. 16, 1984.Google Scholar
11. Firmani, C., Gutierrez, L., Ruiz, E., Bisiacchi, G.F., Salas, L., Paresce, F., Carlson, C.W., Lampton, M., Astron. Astrophys. 134, 251, 1984.Google Scholar
12. Schmidt-Kaler, Th., Rudolph, R., Tüg, H. I.A.U. Coll. 79 (Very Large Telescopes, their Instrumentation and Programs), 659, 1984.Google Scholar
13. Arens, J.F., Lamb, G.M., Peck, M.C., Moseley, H., Hoffmann, W.F., Tresch-Fienberg, R., Fazio, G.G., Astrophys. J. 279, 685, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Dereniak, E.L., Britt, J.P., Fowler, A.M., Joyce, R.R., Boreman, G., Ewing, W.S., Applied Optics 23, 889, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. State-of-the-Art Imaging Arrays and Their Applications, Proc. S.P.I.E. 501,1984.Google Scholar