Aaboe, A. On Babylonian Planetary Theories. Centaurus 5, 209, 1958.Google Scholar

Abetti, G. Osservatori Astronomici d’Italia. VII. L’osservatorio astronomico di Trieste. Luce e Immag. 11, no. 2, 3, 1957.Google Scholar

Abetti, G. Les disciples de Galileo, Sdentici, Bologna 92, 8, 1957.Google Scholar

Abetti, G. Cenni storici sull’inizio ed il progresso delle ricerche sul sole. Boll. Geod. e Sci. affini 16, 635, 1957.Google Scholar

Abetti, G. Italo-American recollections in George Ellery Hale’s life. Atti Fond. Ronchi 15, 235, 1960.Google Scholar

Alter, G. Two Renaissance Astronomers: David Gans, Joseph Delmedigo. Rozpr. ceské Akad. 68, no. 11, 93 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Ahnert, P. Indianische Felszeichungen-ein Bericht von der Supernova 1054? Sterne 35, nos. 5-6, 116, 1959.Google Scholar

Argyrakos, I. Etude de ‘l’astrolabe de Synesius Cyrène’ (4-e siècle) Athens, 14 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Armitage, A. The Astronomical Work of Nicholas Luis de Lacaille. Ann. Sci. 12, 163, 1956.Google Scholar

Arrighi, G. Il real osservatorio astronomico di Marlia (Lucca). Physis 1, 165, 1959.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, J. Roger Boskovich and the moon’s atmosphere. Sky and Telesc. 16, 378, 1957.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, J. Navigators of the old Pacific. Sky and Telesc. 17, 180, 1958.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, J. Julius Schmidt and the Moon. Sky and Telesc. 17, 290, 1958.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, J. The brothers Henry. Sky and Telesc. 17, 394, 1958.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, J. Astronomy in Greenland. Sky and Telesc. 18, 85, 1958.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, J. Lassell’s 4-ft telescope. Sky and Telesc. 18, 664, 1959.Google Scholar

Ashbrook, J. Some Huygens telescopes. Sky and Telesc. 18, 559, 1959.Google Scholar

Auger, L. Les idées de Roberval sur le système du monde. Rev. Hist. Sci., Paris 10, 226, 1957.Google Scholar

Baillaud, R. Copernic et ses précurseurs dans l’étude du système du monde. Ann. Obs. Besançon 5, no. 2, 1957. Bull. Soc. Astr. pop. Toulouse, no. 380-381, 25, 1956.Google Scholar

Baillaud, R. Histoire de l’horloge astronomique de la cathédrale Saint-Jean de Besançon. Ann. franç. Chronom. 13, 69, 1959.Google Scholar

Balan, S. Galileo Galilee. Bucuresti. Ed. tehn. 188 pp. (roum.), 1957.Google Scholar

Barani, S. H. Al-Biruni and his magnum opus, Al-Quanunu’l—Mas’udi. Oriental Publ. Bureau L-LXXV, 1956.Google Scholar

Bertele, H. v. Precision Timekeeping in the pre-Huygens Era. Horol. J. Land., Dec. 1953.Google Scholar

Bertele, H. v. Jost Burgis Beitrag zur Formentwicklung der Uhren. Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlungen in Wien 51, 169, 1955.Google Scholar

Bertele, H. v. Zur Geschichte der Aquationsuhren-Entwicklung. Bl. Tech-Gesch. 19, 78, 1956.Google Scholar

Bertele, H. v. The Bohemian Clock of the Habsburgian Clock Treasures in Vienna. Antiquarian Horology (London) 11, 41, 1957.Google Scholar

Bertele, H. v. Bassermann-Jordan Uhren. Verl. Klinghardt und Biermann, Braunschweig, 530 pp., 1960.Google Scholar

Boas, M. and Hall, R. Tycho Brahe’s system of the world. Occ. Notes R.A.S. 3, 253, 1959.Google Scholar

Brunner-Traut, E. Die Astronomie der Alter. Aus d. Heimat, Stuttgart 66, 1, 1958.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. La Lune chez les anciens. Bull. Soc. Astr. pop. Toulouse, 49, no. 398, 5, 1958.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, J. J. Die astronomische Tafeln von Al Khwarismi. Enseign. math. 2, 1, 1956.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, J. J. Zwei Griechische Ephemeriden. Osiris 13, 79, 1959.Google Scholar

Carmody, F. J. Notes on the Astronomical Work of Thâbit b. Qurra. Isis 46, 235, 1955.Google Scholar

Centenary of Sydney observatory, Austr. J. Sci. 21, no. 2, 31, 1958.Google Scholar

Chapin, S. L. The Astronomical Activities of Nicolas Claude Fabri de Peiresc. Isis 48, 13, 1957.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. B. Galileo’s fallacy. Isis 49, 344, 1958.Google Scholar

Coulson, T. Godfrey’s invention of the reflecting quadrant. J. Franklin Inst. 266, 327, 1958.Google Scholar

Covington, A. E. An early 19th century star map after Aratus. J.R. astr. Soc. Can. 53, 78, 1959.Google Scholar

Davis, G. The Origin of the Ancient Constellations. Sky and Telesc. 18, 424, 1959.Google Scholar

D’Elia, P. Frammenti di due antiche carte cinesi presso l’Osservatorio astronomico di Bologna. Coelum 26, 41, 1958.Google Scholar

Dermul, A. Catalogues d’étoiles. XII. Bode, Gaz. ast. 40, 1, 1958.Google Scholar

Destombes, M. L’Orient et les catalogues d’étoiles au Moyen Age. Arch. int. Hist. Sci. 35, 339, 1956.Google Scholar

Dick, J. Der Berliner Sternwarte erstes Domizil. Sterne 35, 209, 1959.Google Scholar

Drake, S. Numerous short articles on Galileo, mostly entitled ‘Galileo Gleanings’. Isis, 1957, 1958, 1959.Google Scholar

Drake, S. Galileo Gleanings II: A kind word for Salusbury. Isis 49, 26, 1958.Google Scholar

Drake, S. Galileo Gleanings III: A kind word for Sizzi. Isis 49, 155, 1959.Google Scholar

Drake, S. Galileo Gleanings IV: Bibliographical Notes. Isis 49, 409, 1958.Google Scholar

Drake, S. Galileo’s fallacy. Isis 49, 345, 1958.Google Scholar

Drake, S. The starry messenger. Isis 49, 346, 1958.Google Scholar

Drake, S. Galileo’s first telescopes at Padua and Venice. Isis 50, 245, 1959.Google Scholar

Duarte, J. F. O bacharel mestre Joao, a ceu brasileiro e a estrêla polar do sul. Rev. bras. Geogr. 19, 361, 1957.Google Scholar

Dubs, H. H. The beginnings of Chinese astronomy. J. Amer. orient. Soc., 1958.Google Scholar

Duhem, P. Le système du monde. Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic. T.8. Paris, Hermann, 512 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Emmot, U. John Theaphilus Desaguliers, Optician 136, 241, 1958.Google Scholar

Evans, M. G. Newton and the cause of gravity. Amer. J. Phys. 26, 619, 1958.Google Scholar

Evans, D. S. The astronomical work of Sir John Herschel at the Cape. Quart. Bull. S. Afric. Libr. 12, 44, 1957.Google Scholar

Evans, D. S. Dashing and dutiful: Herschel and Maclear made a strange if effective team in their astronomical work at the Cape of Good Hope. Science 127, 935, 1958.Google Scholar

Fauth, H. Philipp Fauth and the Moon. Sky and Telesc. 19, 21, 1959.Google Scholar

Fermer, B. Resa i Europa En astronom, industrispion och teaterhabitué genom Danmark, Tyskland, Holland, England, Frankrike och Italien, 1758-62. Uppsala, Almqvist & Wiksells, 572 pp., 1956.Google Scholar

Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. Eine unabhängige Bestätigung der Haufigkeitsfunktion der Sternmassen (Würdigung und neue Auswertung der wohl ältesten Untersuchung zu dieser Thema). Anz. öst. Akad. Wiss. 209, 1953 =Mitt. wien. Sternw. 6, 237.Google Scholar

Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. Maximilian Hell und Piacidus Fixemillner, Bergründer der neueren Astronomie in Österreich. Österreich Naturforscher, Arzte und Techn. 27, 225, 1957.Google Scholar

Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. and Hugo, von Seeliger. Grosse Österreicher 11, 177, Amalthea-Verlag, Wien, 1957.Google Scholar

Ferrari d’Occhieppo, K. and Neumann, E. Astronomische und künstgeschichtliche Bedeutung zweier Armillarsphären des Kunsthistorischen Museums in Wien. Mitt. Inst. Österr. Gesch 67, 135.Google Scholar

Fettweiss, E. Astronomical Knowledge of tribes in Africa, America, Australia and Oceania. Scientia, Bologna 94, 279, 1959.Google Scholar

Fettweiss, E. Sternkundliche Kenntnisse in der Legensrührung bei heutigen Naturvölkern. Scientia, Bologna 94, 279, 1959.Google Scholar

Fleckenstein, J. O. and Lagar, F. Un Diario di G. V. Schiaparelli. Act. Cong. Int. Hist. Sci. (Florence, 1956), 433, 1958.Google Scholar

Fleckenstein, J. O. Die mathematischen und astronomischen Handschriften und Frühdrucke in Basel. Ciba-Festschrift, Basel, 41, 1959.Google Scholar

Fleckenstein, J. O. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Barock und Universalismus. Ott-Verl., München, 200 pp.Google Scholar

Fleckenstein, J. O. Le problème de la forme de la fusée pour chronomètre dans l’histoire du calcul infinitésimal autour de 1700. Cong. Int. Chronom. 1959, Munich, 1960.Google Scholar

Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. Translated with an Introduction and notes by Drake, S.. N.Y., Doubleday and Co., XI + 302 pp., 1957.Google Scholar

Gaythorpe, S. B. The lunar hand-calendar of Magister Anianus. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 80, 1959.Google Scholar

Geymonat, L. Galileo Galilei. Torino, G. Einaudi, 384 pp., 1957.Google Scholar

Gingerich, O. Abbé Lacaille’s list of clusters and nebulae. Sky and Telesc. 19, 207, 1960.Google Scholar

Gleisberg, B. Richard Carrington (Zur Erinnerung an seine Entdeckung der Zonen Wanderung der Sonnenflecken vor hundert Jahren). Sterne 35, 31, 1959.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, A. D., Etchecopar, C. A. and Montero, C. P. Primer Observatorio de Montevideo. Montevideo, XXVIII + 148 pp., 1955.Google Scholar

Hacar, B. Johann Georg Palitsch, sedálkastronom. Rise Hvezd 39, 277, 1958.Google Scholar

Hall, A. R. Newton on the calculation of central forces. Ann. Sci. 13/12, 62, 1958.Google Scholar

Hall, A. R. Galileo’s fallacy. Isis 49, 342, 1958.Google Scholar

Edmond, Halley. (1656-1742): papers to commemorate the tercentenary of his birth. Mem. Brit. astr. Ass. 37, no. 3, 39 pp., 1956.Google Scholar

Hogg, A. R. The great Melbourne telescope. Aust. J. Sci. 21, 2, 1958.Google Scholar

Hopmann, J. 200 Jahre Astronomie in Wien. Alm. öst. Akad. Wiss. 445, 1956.Google Scholar

Hopmann, J. Johann Palisa und Johann Holetschek, Planetoiden und Kometenforscher. Österr. Naturforsch., Arzte und Techniker 32, 227, 1957.Google Scholar

Hosotte-Reynaud, M. Identification d’ún des astrolabes de la mosquée des Andalous. Hespéris, Rabat 44, 178, 1957.Google Scholar

Jai, Singh. Isolated astronomer. Cranbrook Inst. Sci. News Letter 27, 46, 1957.Google Scholar

Jankovic, N. Astronomical data in ancient chronicles. Vasiona 6, 38, 1958 (in Serb.).Google Scholar

Jansky, C. M. The Discovery and Identification by Karl Guthe Jansky of electro-magnetic Radiation of extra-terrestrial Origin in the Radio Spectrum. Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs. N. Y. 46, 13, 1958.Google Scholar

Järnefelt, G. J. Tähtitieteellinen Tutkimus Suomessa. (L’histoire de l’astronomie finlandaise), Helsinki, 1960.Google Scholar

Jimenez-Chavez, R. Mithologia astrónómica Nahuatl. Universo, Méx. 13, no. 46, 7, 1959 (in Span.).Google Scholar

Kauffeldt, A. Nikolaus Kopernikus. Der Umsturz d. mittelalterl. Welbildes. Leipzig-Jena, Urania-Verl., 145 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E. S. A survey of Islamic astronomical tables. Trans. Amer. phil. Soc. 46, 123, 1956.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E. S. The Sasanian Astronomical handbook, J. Amer. orient. Soc., 1958.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E. S. A letter of Janshid al-Kâshi to his father, Orientalia. Comm. Period. Pontif. Inst. Biblici, 1960.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E. S. and Murunwa, A. Biruni on the Solar Equation. J. Near Eastern Studies, 1958.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E. S. and Roberts, V. The planetary Theory of Ibn-al-Shatir. Isis, 1959.Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. E. Historical research in astronomy. J.R.A.S., Can. 53, 252, 1959.Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. E. and Burland, M. S. A Gregorian telescope. J.R.A.S., Can. 52, 255, 1958.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. B. The planetary theory of Ibn al-Shatir. Isis 50, 227, 1959.Google Scholar

Kepler, J. Gesamte Werke, Bd. 18, Briefe (1620-30). Ed. Dich, and Caspar, , M. München, Beck, 592 pp., 1959.Google Scholar

King, H. C. The planetarium. Endeavour 18, 35, 1959.Google Scholar

King, H. C. The History of the Planetarium. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 4, 1960.Google Scholar

Knox-Shaw, H. The Radcliffe Observatory. Vistas in Astronomy, 1, 144, 1955.Google Scholar

Kotsakis, D. Astronomy and Mathematical Sciences during the Byzantine period (in Greek). Publ. Lab. astr. Univ. Athens, no. 10, 20 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Koyré, A. L’oeuvre astronomique de Kepler. Bull. Soc. d’Etude du XVII-e siècle, no. 30, 69, 1956.Google Scholar

Koyré, A. and Cohen, I. B. Critical and variorum edition of Newton’s ‘Principia’. Isis 49, 81, 1958.Google Scholar

Kunitzsch, P. Arabische Sternnamen in Europa. Verlag Otto Harrassowitz. Wiesbaden, 240 pp., 1959.Google Scholar

Labbé, J. En feuilletant le calendrier des Bhils. Sci. et voyages, no. 151, 59, 1958.Google Scholar

Layton, D. The motion of the planets. Newton’s effect on English thought. History to-day, 7, 288, 1957.Google Scholar

Le Duchat, d’Aubigny. Deux esprits du XVIII-e siècle. Vayringe, P. et Messier, C.. Astronomie 73, 280, 1959.Google Scholar

Leopardi, G. Sugli errori popolari degli antichi. Del Sole. Coelum 27, 76, 1959.Google Scholar

Leopardi, G. Sugli errori popolari degli antichi. Degli astri. Coelum 27, 112, 1959.Google Scholar

Leopardi, G. Sugli errori popolari degli antichi. Dell’astrologia, delle eclissi, delle comete. Coelum 27, 140, 1959.Google Scholar

Link, F. and Linkova, Z. Méthodes astronomiques dans la climatologie historique (Période solaire et climatique de 400 ans). Studia geophys. et geod. 3, 43, 1959.Google Scholar

Löchel, K. Zum Gedenken an Bernhard Schmidt. Sterne 35, 197, 1959.Google Scholar

Longauer, F. Po stopách kultu Mesiaca v Podunajsku. (About the lunar cult to the Danube region). Rise Hvezd 39, 82, 1958.Google Scholar

Luplau-Janssen, A. Lidt astronomi fra Karl den Stores lid. (Astronomy in Charles the Great’s times). Urania 15, 49, 1958 (in Czech).Google Scholar

Mayer, L. A. Islamic astrolabists and their works. Geneva, 123 pp., 1956.Google Scholar

Michel, H. Le plus ancient instrument d’astronomie: Le Pi. Ciel et Terre, no. 5–6, 1959.Google Scholar

Michel, H. Méthodes astronomiques des Hautes époques choises. Confér, du Palais de la Découverte, Paris, 1959.Google Scholar

Milankovitch, M. History of the astronomical science from early time till 1727. Beograd, ‘Scientific book’, 143 pp., 1954.Google Scholar

Miller, M. Aristarch von Samos als Vorläufer des Kopernikus. Wiss. Z., Hochschule Verkehrwesen Dresden, 6, 257, 1958-9.Google Scholar

Mohr, J. Forty years of Czéchò-Slòvák astronomy. Rise Hvezd 39, 217, 1958 (in Czech).Google Scholar

Moore, P. A defence of Schröter. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 363, 1960.Google Scholar

Mougenot, R. L’oeuvre astronomique de Henri Poincaré. Astronomie 73, 279, 1959.Google Scholar

Needham, J. How the Chinese invented the mechanical clock. New Scientist 4, 1481, 1958.Google Scholar

Needham, J. Chinese astronomy and the Jesuit mission: an encounter of cultures. London, China Soc., 24 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Needham, J. The missing link in horological history: a Chinese contribution. Proc. roy. Soc., A, 250, 147, 1959.Google Scholar

Needham, J., Wang, Ling and Price, D. J. Heavenly clockwork. Camb. Univ. Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. The transmission of planetary theories in ancient and medieval astronomy. Scr. math., N. Y. 22, 165, 1957.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. Notes on Al-Kaid. J. Amer. orient. Soc. 1957.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. The astronomical tables P. Lond. 1278. Osiris 13, 93, 1958.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. Studies in Byzantine astronomical terminology. Trans. Amer. phil. Soc. 50, no. 2, 45 pp., 1960.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. On a fragment of Heliodorus (?) on planetary motions. Sudhoffs Arch. Gesch. Med. und Naturwiss. 42, 237, 1958.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. Regula Philippi Arrhidaei. Isis, 1959.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O. The equivalence of eccentric and epicyclic motion according to Apollonius. Scr. math., N.Y. 24, 5, 1959.Google Scholar

Nielsen, A. V. Omkring opdagelsen af Neptun. (On the discovery of Neptun). Nord. astr. Tidsskr., no. 3, 93, 1959.Google Scholar

Nordenmark, N. V. E. Astronomiens historia i Sverige intill ar 1800 (History of astronomy in Sweden before 1800). Uppsala, 295 pp., 1959.Google Scholar

Nørlind, W. On some manuscripts concerning Tycho Brahe. Observatory 78, 73, 1958.Google Scholar

Pecker, J. C. Le Ciel (contains interesting historical review). Encyclopédie Essentielle, Série Science, no. 3, R. Delpire, Paris, 112 pp., 1960.Google Scholar

Pines, S. La théorie de la rotation de la Terre à l’époque d’al Biruni. J. asiat. 244, 301, 1956.Google Scholar

Pingree, D. A Greek linear planetary Text in India. J. Amer. orient. Soc., 1959.Google Scholar

Plakidis, S. Astronomy in Modern Greece. Athens. 59 pp., 1960.Google Scholar

Price, D. J. A medieval footnote to Ptolemaic precession. Vistas in astronomy 1, 66, 1955.Google Scholar

Price, D. J., Wang, Ling and Needham, J. Chinese astronomical clockwork. Nature, Lond. 177, 600, 1956.Google Scholar

Price, D. J. Leonardo da Vinci and the clock of Giovanni di Dondi. Antiq. Horol., June 1958.Google Scholar

Price, D. J. The first scientific instrument of the Renaissance. Physis 1, 26, 1959.Google Scholar

Price, D. J. On the origin of clockwork, perpetual motion devices and the compass. Contr. Mus. Hist. techn. Bui. 218, pap. 6, 81.Google Scholar

Price, D. J. An ancient Greek computer. Sci. Amer., June, 1959.Google Scholar

Price, D. J. Contra-Copernicus: A critical reestimation of the mathematical planetary theory of Ptolemy, Copernicus and Kepler. From Critical problems in the history of science. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1959.Google Scholar

Price, D. J. The Antikythera mechanism, an ancient Greek computer. Yearb. Amer. phil. Soc., 618, 1959.Google Scholar

Pritchett, W. K. The Athenian Lunar Month. Classical Philology, 1959.Google Scholar

Pulec, M. J. Nejstarši astronomická památka v. Cechách. (The oldest astronomical monument in Czechoslovakia). Rise Hvezd 39, 136, 1958 (in Czech).Google Scholar

Roberts, V. The solar and lunar theory of Ibn ash-Shatir. A pre-Copernican copernican model. Isis 48, 428, 1957.Google Scholar

Rosen, E. Was Maurolico’s Essay on the Nova of 1572 Printed? Isis 48, 171, 1957.Google Scholar

Rosen, E. Galileo’s misstatements about Copernicus. Isis 49, 319, 1958.Google Scholar

Rosen, E. Articles about Galileo. Isis, 1957, 1958.Google Scholar

Rosen, E. Three Copernican Treatises. Dover Reprint. 1959.Google Scholar

Sauvenier-Coffin, E. Une page de l’enseignement des sciences exactes dans l’ancien pays de Liège: le Tractatus de horologiis du Père Linus. Bull. Soc. Sci. Liège 27, 280, 1958.Google Scholar

Sayili, A. The introductory section of Habash’s astronomical tables known as the ‘Damascene’ Zij. Ankara Univ. Cografya Fakultes; Dergisi XIII, Cilt 4, 133, 1955.Google Scholar

Sayili, A. Al Khazini’s treatise on astronomical instruments. Ankara Univ. 14, 1, 1956.Google Scholar

Sayili, A. Ghiyâth al Din’s Letter on Ulugh Bey and the scientific Activity in Samarquand. Turkish Historical Society. Ankara, 115 pp., 1960.Google Scholar

Sayili, A. The observatory in Islam. Turkish Historical Society. Ankara, 472 pp. 1960.Google Scholar

Schröder, , Wilfried, . Die astronomischen Sammlungen in Reichsmuseum für die Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften in Leiden. Sterne 35, 236, 1959.Google Scholar

Shapley, H. Of stars and men. The human response to an expanding universe. Boston Beacon Press, 157 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Shapley, H. On the astronomical high lights of a half century. Irish astr. J. 5, 190, 1959.Google Scholar

Smith, E. B. Jean-Sylvain Bailly, astronomer, mystic, revolutionary, 1736-93. Trans. Amer. phil. Soc. 44, 427, 1954.Google Scholar

Stebbins, F. A. A roman sundial. J. R. astr. Soc. Can. 52, 250, 1958.Google Scholar

Stebbins, F. A. A sixteenth century planetarium. J. R. astr. Soc. Can. 53, 197, 1959.Google Scholar

Stone, A. P. Astronomical instruments at Calcutta, Delhi, and Jaipur. Arch. int. Hist. Sci. 11, 159, 1958.Google Scholar

Struve, O. About a Russian Astronomer (B. P. Gerasimovich). Sky and Telesc. 16, 379, 1957.Google Scholar

Struve, O. Henri Poincaré and his cosmogonical studies. Sky and Telesc. 17, 226, 1958.Google Scholar

Struve, O. G. A. Shajn and Russian Astronomy. Sky and Telesc. 17, 272, 1958.Google Scholar

Talgeri, K. M. Jai Singh and his observatory at New Delhi. Sky and Telesc. 18, 70, 1958.Google Scholar

Taylor, E. G. R. The Earth but a satellite of the Sun. (Interesting history of the statement of the heliocentric conception in England). J. Inst. Navig. 11, 150, 1958.Google Scholar

Teucher, A. Palitzsch und der Halleysche Komet. Wissen und Leben 4, 224, 1959.Google Scholar

The correspondence of Isaac Newton, vol. 1. Ed. Turnbull, H. W. and Scott, S. F., Cambridge Univ. Press, 468 pp., 1960.Google Scholar

Thomson, S. H. Trosseteste’s Questio de Calore, de Cometis, and de Operacionibus Solis. Medievalia et Humanística, 1957.Google Scholar

Thorndike, L. Some tracts on comets, 1456-1500. Arch. int. Hist. Sci. 11, 225, 1958.Google Scholar

Thorndike, L. Notes upon some medieval astronomical, astrological and mathematical manuscripts at Florence, Milan, Bologna and Venice. Isis 50, 33, 1959.Google Scholar

Tombaugh, C. W. Reminiscences of the Discovery of Pluto. Sky and Telesc. 19, 364, 1960.Google Scholar

Una astronomia del siglo VII por San Isidoro de Seville. Urania (Madrid) 42, 237, 1957 (in Spain.).Google Scholar

Ungerer, T., Ungerer, Sh. and Leclerc, L. L’horloge astronomique de la cathédrale de Strasbourg, historique, description, fonctionnement. Strasbourg, Roux, 10th edition, ill., 48 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

van der Hulst, H. C. ‘Zonnewervels’ een jubileum. Hemel en Dampkring 56, 16, 1958.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. Babylonische Planetenrechnung in Agypten und Indien. Bibl. Orientalis, 13, 108, 1956.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. Babylonische Planetenrechnung. Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich 102, 39, 1957.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. Die Handlichen Tafeln des Ptolemaios. Osiris 13, 54, 1959.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. Babylonische Methoden in ägyptischen Planetentafeln. Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich 105, 97, 1960.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. The astronomical papyrus Ryland 27. Centaurus 5, 177, 1958.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. Drei umstrittene Mondfinsternisse bei Ptolemaios. Museum Helveticum XV, 106, 1958.Google Scholar

Vincent, M. Le mystère de la découverte de Neptune par Leverrier. Paris, Fischbacher, 35 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

West, M. L. Anaxagoras and the meteorite of 467 B.C. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 368, 1960.Google Scholar

Wihters, , Don, . Time through the ages. Mich. Technic. 76, no. 7, 24, 66, 1958.Google Scholar

Wisner, A. Astronomische und mathematische Instrumente im Deutschen Museum zu München. Sudhoffs Arch. Gesch. Med. und Naturmss., 42, 227, 1958.Google Scholar

Wolf, H. The solar parallax and the growth of international scientific cooperation in the 18th century. Act. Cong. Int. Hist. Sci. (Florence, 1956), 373, 1958.Google Scholar

Woolf, , Harry, . The Transits of Venus; a Study of 18th Century Science. Princeton Univ. Press, ill., XIII + 258 pp., 1959.Google Scholar

Wünschmann, F. Die alte Berliner Sternwarte um 1800 unter Johann Eiert Bode. Mber. dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 2, 250, 1960.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Astronomische Instrumente der christlichen Völker Europas un 10-11. Jahrhundert. Miscelánea de Estudos a Joaquim de Carvalho 4, 356, 1960.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. El mundo de las estrellas. Barcelona, Ed. Herder, , 202 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Neue Forschungen über der Sternenmantel Kaiser Heinrich II. Ein angeblicher Brief des N. Copernicus. Ber. naturf. Ges. Bamberg 36, 1, 1958.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Eine merkwürdige gotische Standuhr. Die Uhr 12, no. 9, 18, 1958.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Die Augsburger Uhrmacherei von 1550 bis 1650. Neue Uhrmacher-Zeitung 12, no. 16, 27, 1958.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Die Uhr und das Pendel. Die Uhr 12, no. 18, 31, 1958.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Alte Uhren in Russland. Die Uhr 13, no. 2, 26, 1959.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Astronomiegeschichtliche Forschungen in Moskau und Leningrad. Forsch. Fortschr. dtsch. Wiss. 33, 104, 1959.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Clocks in Russian Museums. Antiq. Horol. 2, 206, 1959.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Wissenschaftliche Instrumente. Alte Uhren. Kaysers Kunst-und Antiquitätenbuch, 2, 39, 1959.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Astronomia e astrologia, Encicl. Univ. dell’ Arte 2, 118, 1958.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Cosmografia e cosmologia, Encicl. Univ. de Arte 3, 496, 1959.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Nürnbergs wissenschaftliche Bedeutung am Ende des Mittelalters. Mitt. Ver. Gesch. Stadt Nürnberg 50, 113, 1960.Google Scholar

Zinner, E. Forschungen in Spanien und Portugal. Die Bücher Regiomontans in Spanien. Die magnetische Vermessung einiger westgotischer Kirchen in Spanien. Der Sternhimmel mit den Planetenherrschen. Uber die niederländische Astronomie am Erde des Mittelalters. Europäische Sonnenuhren. Alte Masse an Kirchen und Rathäusern. Bern. naturf. Ges. Bamberg 37, 1960.Google Scholar

Go, Tsin-Chung. The origin of the doctrine on 28 signs of the Lunar Zodiac. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Issue 4, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 55 (in Russian), 1957.Google Scholar

Liu-Sien-Chjou, . On the invention of the devices for the measurings of the time. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Issue 4, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 105 (in Russian), 1957.Google Scholar

Hsi Zze-Tsung, . On the theory Gai-Tien and the theory Huan-tien. Acta astr. Sinica 8, 80, 1960. (Resumé in English).Google Scholar

Tang, Ju-chwan. Discussions on some problems concerning the Gai-tien theory as interpreted in Professor Chen Tsun-Kwai’s ‘A concise history of ancient Chinese Astronomy’. Acta astr. Sinica 5, no. 2, 292 (Resumé in English), 1957.Google Scholar

Tsien, Pao-tsung. On calendar system ‘Chou-Chi’, created by Go Chou-Tsin. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Issue 5, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 164, (in Russian), 1957.Google Scholar

Ameisenowa, Z. Globe of Martin Bylica from Olkusha and the map of the sky in the East and in the West. Wroclaw Zaklad Narodowy im. Ossolinskich. 55 pp., tabl. 46, 1959.Google Scholar

Baranowski, H. Copernic Bibliography of 1509-1955. Warszawa Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 449 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Barycz, H. La participation de la Pologne dans les études sur le texte ‘De Revolutionibus’ de Nicolas Copernic. Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, Special issue, 123, 1957-8.Google Scholar

Birkenmajer, A. Andrzej Grzymala from Poznan—an astronomer and a physician of the 15th century. Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki 3, 409, 1958.Google Scholar

Birkenmajer, A. Was Khilary from Wislica a fighter for the heliocentric system in Krakow? Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, no. 3, 419, 1959.Google Scholar

Birkenmajer, A. Was Leovitus an opponent of Copernic? Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, no. 1, 19, 1959.Google Scholar

Birkenmajer, A. Working plan on the history of astronomy in Poland. Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z.2, 7, 1959.Google Scholar

Gansiniec, R. The title of the astronomical work by Nicholas Copernic. Kwartalnik Hist. Nauki i Techniki, no. 1, 195, 1958.Google Scholar

Huber, P. Ueber den Nullpunkt der babylonischen Ekliptik. Centaurus 5, 192, 1958.Google Scholar

Kamienski, M. Comet Halley in 1163 BC and the fall of Troy. Acta astr., Cracoviae 8, no. 2, 62, 1958.Google Scholar

Kamienski, M. Fifty years of the research of the comet P/Wolf I. Postepy Astronomii, z.4,. 283, 1959.Google Scholar

Kamienski, M. An essay on the history of the Warsaw Observatory 1815-1945. Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z.2, 69, 1959.Google Scholar

Kamienski, M. Halley’s comet in the time of Hammurabi, J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 304, 1960.Google Scholar

Kamienski, M. Unknown comet about 2008 B.C. was probably Halley’s comet. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 70, 314, 1960.Google Scholar

Kepinski, F. The Institute and the Astronomical observatory of the Warsaw Polytechnica School (1925-55). Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej, Seria C, z.2, 1117, 1959.Google Scholar

Koziel, K. Theory on physical libration of the Moon in the 20th century. Postepy Astronomii z. 2, 101, 1960.Google Scholar

Orlowski, B. The end of the legend about Copernic-engineer. Problemy, no. 8, 600, 1960.Google Scholar

Przypkowski, T. Astronomy in Kalish. 18th century of Kalish. Scientific works and materials on the history of Kalish and Kalish region. T. I. Kalisz, Wydawnictwo Poznanskie, 155, 1960.Google Scholar

Przypkowski, T. The largest solar clock in Europe. Problemy, no. 4, 254, 1960.Google Scholar

Przypkowski, T. Experimental table of Nicholas Copernic in Olshtyn in the light of modern discoveries of 1956-57. Summary on the paper. Postepy Astronomii, z. 3, 107, 1958.Google Scholar

Rybka, E. A short essay on the history of astronomy in Lvov. Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z. 2, 53, 1959.Google Scholar

Rybka, E. From the history of Krakow astronomy. Problemy, no. 9, 641, 1960.Google Scholar

Rybka, E. Wincenty Wisniewski (1781-1855)—a forgotten astronomer. Problemy, no. 7, 529, 1960.Google Scholar

Stolyhwo, K. Memoirs on the first period of scientific and pedagogical activity of Tadeusz Banachiewicz in astronomy. Postepy Astronomii, z. 1, 67, 1960.Google Scholar

Dziewulski, W. The history of St. Batory’s observatory in Vilno (1919-19). Studia i materialy z dziejów nauki polskiej. Seria C, z. 2, 29, 1959.Google Scholar

Arlazorov, M.S. Konstantin Eduardovitch Ziolkovsky. His life and activity. 2nd ed. with corrections and supplements. State Publ. house of technical literature, 144 pp., 1957 (Gostechizdat).Google Scholar

Aksentjeva, Z.N. Studies in the Poltava gravimetrical observatory of the Ukrainian Academy of sciences from Dec. 1, 1955 to May 1, 1958. Trans. 14th U.S.S.R. Conf. Astron., Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Moscow-Leningrad, 51.Google Scholar

Ventzel, M.K. Astronomy in the Moscow Geodetic Institute (from the history of the native practical field astronomy) Trans. Moscow Inst. eng. Geodesy, aerophotography and cartography, no. 35, 67, 1959.Google Scholar

Vorobjev, B.N. From K. E. Ziolkovsky’s correspondence (from K. E. Ziolkovsky’s funds in Archives of the U.S.S.R. Acad. of sciences), Questions Hist. natural Sci. Tech., no. 6, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 46, 1958.Google Scholar

Vorobjev, B.N. K. E. Ziolkovsky’s early studies in interplanetary communiciations. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. no. 6, Moscow, Acad Sci. U.S.S.R. 30, 1958.Google Scholar

Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B.A. Astronomy (in XVIII c.) Hist. nat. Sci. in Russia 1, part 1, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 296, 1957.Google Scholar

Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B.A. Astronomy (first half of 14th century) Ibid, part 2, 104.Google Scholar

Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B.A. Astronomy (before the XVIII c.) Hist. nat. Sci. in Russia. 1, part 1. Moscow, U.S.S.R. Acad. Sci. 49, 1957.Google Scholar

Vuuk, A. On astronomical observations in North Estonia in XIII c Tartu Obs. Calendar 1960 (in Estonian).Google Scholar

Djalialov, G.D. Gijas ad-Din Djemshid Chusti (Kashi)—the most eminent astronomer and mathematician of 15th century. Mem. (Utchenye Zapisky) Tashkent state pedagogic Inst., 1957 no. 7, 14, 1959.Google Scholar

Evgenjev, I. and Kuznetzova, L.M. In search of the fire stone. A sketch about Kulik, L. A., the initiator of Soviet meteoritics. Geographical publishing house, 213 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Zhelnin, G.A. and Miursepp, P.V. Material monuments of W. Struve’s scientific activity in Tartu astronomical obs. in the period from 1812 to 1839. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. (Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.) 17, 473, 1957.Google Scholar

Ziegel, F.J. Fedor Alexandrovitch Bredikhin. His life and activity. State technical publishing house (Gostechizdat), 152 pp., 1957.Google Scholar

Hist. nat. Sci. in Russia; Ed. Figurovsky, N. A.. vol. 1, part I. The development of natural sciences in Russia before 1800 and in 18th century. Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 1957, 495 pp., 1957. Part 2. Development of natural sciences in Russia in the first half of the 19th century., Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 380 pp., 1957.Google Scholar

History of the physical and mathematical sciences. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 19, 723 pp., 1957.Google Scholar

Karimov, M.G. Academician Vasilij Grigorjevitch Fesenkov. Vestnik Kazakh. Acad. Sci. 1, 89, 1959.Google Scholar

Korytnikov, S.N. About the first Simonovsky observatory of the Kazan University. Mem. (Utchenye Zapisky) Kazan Univ. 117, 181, 1957.Google Scholar

Korytnikov, S.N. About a forgotten name in the history of native astronomy (A. A. Bugrov). Mem. Kazan Univ. 117, 177, 1957.Google Scholar

Krivtzov, V.A. Cosmogonical treatise of 11th century. Questions of Philosophy, no. 12, 106, 1958.Google Scholar

Kulikovsky, P.G. History of astronomy. In the symposium Astronomy in the U.S.S.R. for 40 years , Moscow, 365, 1960.Google Scholar

Mamedbeili, G.D. Nasireddin Tusi Muhamed (Astronomer and mathematician of Azerbaidjan, 1201-74). Baku, 154 (in Azerb.), 1957.Google Scholar

Mamedbeili, G.D. Astronomical instruments of Maraga observatory. Trans. astrophys., Azerbaidjan Acad. Sci. 1, 84, 1959.Google Scholar

Melnikov, O.A. Fedor Alexandrovitch Bredikhin (To the 125-anniversary since his birthday) Pulkovo Bull. 20, no. 6, 1, 1958.Google Scholar

Melnikov, O.A. Josef Fraunhoffer (1787-1826). Trans. Inst. nat. Sci. Tech. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 22, 114, 1959.Google Scholar

Nevskaya, N.I. Scientific relations of F. A. Bredikhin with the eminent Russian scientists of the last quarter of 19th century. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 28, 464, 1959.Google Scholar

Pavlov, N.N. On W. Struve’s views of the question on the estimation of the precision of the interpolation and extrapolation of clock corrections. Trans. All-Union Inst. Phys. Tech. & Radiotech. Measurements no. 1, 13, 1958.Google Scholar

Perel, J.G. Evolution of the ideas on the Universe. Moscow, Publ. House of Phys. and Math. Literature, 352 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Perel, J.G. Problems of the history of astronomy at the conference on the history of natural sciences and technics. Astr. J. Moscow 36, 975, 1959.Google Scholar

Prudnikov, V.E. On the question about P. L. Tchebyshev’s studies on astronomy. Historico-Mathematical Investigations, Issue 10, State Technical & Theoretical Publishing House (Gostechteoretizdat) 639, 1957.Google Scholar

Rzaev, N. Method of conversion of the lunar system of chronology into the solar. Dokl. Azerbaidjan Acad. Sci. 4, 339, 1958 (in Azerb., summary in Russian).Google Scholar

Rijves, V.G. Development of astronomy in Estonia. Nature of Estonia, no. 4, 1960 (in Estonian).Google Scholar

Romanova, N.S. K.E. Ziolkovski’s documents in the Moscow section of the Archives of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech., issue 6, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 50, 1958.Google Scholar

Sabaev, V.P. To the question on the history of astronomical azimuth determinations. Bull. higher schools Geod. Aerophotog. no. 6, 45, 1959.Google Scholar

Selikhanovitch, V.G. Aleksei Nikolaevitch Savitch. Mathematician, astronomer, teacher (1810-83). (Sketch of the life and activity in science and teaching). Moscow, State Geodesy Publ. House (Geodezizdat), 77 pp., 1957.Google Scholar

Seleshnikov, S.I. History of Calendar and its forthcoming reform. Leningrad, Publishing House (Lenizdat), 71 pp., 1959.Google Scholar

Seleshnikov, S.I. History of modern calendar. To its forthcoming reform. Leningrad, ill. 54 pp., 1958.Google Scholar

Slonim, J.M. Development of solar investigations in Tashkent astronomical observatory for 75 years (1874-1949). Trans. (Trudy) Tashkent Obs. 6, 37, 1957.Google Scholar

Sokolova, N.V. The diary of observations by A. D. Krasilnikov and N. G. Kurganov of Venus passage over the disk of the Sun on 26 May, 1761. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. (Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.) 19, 619, 1957.Google Scholar

Sokolsky, V.N. Konstantine Eduardovitch Ziolkovsky. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. issue 6, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 24, 1958.Google Scholar

Subbotin, M.F. Astronomical studies of Leonard Euler. In coll. of papers: Leonard Euler. To the 250th anniversary since his birthday. Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 268, 1958 (summary in German).Google Scholar

Subbotin, M.F. Leonard Euler and the astronomical problems of his times. Questions Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. issue 7, Moscow, Acad. of Sciences U.S.S.R., 58, 1959.Google Scholar

Three pioneers in astronautics. 2. Ziolkovsky, K. E. (an autobiography) Astronautics, 4, no. 5, 48, 63, 1959.Google Scholar

Tchenakal, V.L. Euler and Lomonosov (to the history of their scientific relation). In coll. of papers: Leonard Euler. To the 250th anniversary since his birthday, Moscow, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 423, 1958.Google Scholar

Shajn, G.A. Lebedev and Astrophysics. Trans. Inst. Hist. nat. Sci. Tech. 28, 66, 1959.Google Scholar

Sharonov, V.V. Lomonosov as an organizer in Russia of observations of the transit of Venus over the disk of the Sun in 1761 and his discovery of the atmosphere of Venus. In coll. of papers and materials M. V. Lomonosov, 4, 1960.Google Scholar

Shibanov, F.A. The pioneer of Russian field astronomy A.D. Krassilnikov. Mem. (Utchenye Zapisky) Leningr. State Univ., no. 226, 21, 1958.Google Scholar

Shcheglov, V.P. Tchardzhui international latitude station. Astr. J. Moscow, 34, 664, 1957.Google Scholar

Shcheglov, V.P. The Kitab international latitude station, Nature (Priroda), no. 11, 46, 1958.Google Scholar

Shcheglov, V.P. Astronomical investigations in the Uzbekh S.S.R. for 40 years (1917-57). Trans. Tashkent astr. Obs. 6, 5, 1957.Google Scholar

Astapovich, I.S. Radiants of meteor streams according to the observations in China in the first thousand years of A.D. Questions of Cosmogony 7, 167, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 1960.Google Scholar

Erpylev, N.P. Development of stellar Astronomy in Russia in 19th century, 13-349.Google Scholar

Tchenakal, V.L. Herschel’s Mirror Telescopes in Russia, 253-340.Google Scholar

Dingle, H. Edmond Halley. His Times and Ours, 341-66.Google Scholar

Chen, Tsun-ven. Astronomy in China, 367-80.Google Scholar

Djalalov, G.D. Remarkable statements of Astronomers belonging to the Samarkand school, 380-6.Google Scholar

Jakhontova, N.S. Naum Ilyich Idelson, 387-406.Google Scholar

Korytnikov, S.N. Works by N. I. Idelson on the history of Astronomy, 407-32.Google Scholar

Idelson, N.I. Urbain Le Verrier, 433-52.Google Scholar

Tchudovitcheva, N.A. Astronomical works of V. P. Engelhardt (comments by Korytnikov, S. W.), 453-66.Google Scholar

Rabinovitch, I.M. Problems of celestial mechanics in the works of P. G. Bole, 467-80.Google Scholar

Dobrovolsky, V.A. The part played by the first Directors of the Pulkovo Observatory in the organization of the Kiev Observatory, 481-90.Google Scholar

Novokshanova, L.K. Astronomical Observatory in the military topography department of the General Staff, 491-8.Google Scholar

Kharadze, E.K. and Kotchlashvili, T.A. On the study of the history of astronomical knowledge in Georgia (Preliminary information), 499-508.Google Scholar

Letters by Gedeonov, D. D. to Witkowsky, W. W.. Comments by V. P. Shcheglov, 509-72.Google Scholar

Cerasky, V.K. Note about the Moscow observatory, 573-9.Google Scholar

Annotated References to selected works on the history of Astronomy published in 1956 and 1957 (Perel, J. G.).Google Scholar

Tchenakal, V.L. James Short and Russian Astronomy, 11-82.Google Scholar

Lavrova, N.B. Sketches on the history of the astronomical bibliography, 83-196.Google Scholar

Perel, J.G. Humboldťs ‘Cosmos’ and its role in the evolution of the ideas on the structure of the Universe, 197-222.Google Scholar

Dobrovolsky, I.G. and Brabitch, V.M. Antonius Pius coins of Alexandria, 223-30.Google Scholar

Tumanian, B.E. Ancient Armenian astrolabe of the XVII century, 231-248.Google Scholar

Nabokov, M.E. ‘Cosmograph’ by A. G. Obodovsky, 249-56.Google Scholar

Shibanov, F.A. A.F. Golubev—talented Russian cartographer and mathematician of the middle of the 19th century, 257-70.Google Scholar

Correspondence of L. Euler and T. Meyer. Published by Kopelevitch, J. H., 271-444.Google Scholar

Baikov, A.A. Pulkovo Observatory in 1901-7, 445-6.Google Scholar

Selected bibliography of the literature on the history of astronomy, issued in the U.S.S.R. and other countries in 1957 and 1958 (Perel, J. G.), 457-62.Google Scholar

Kulikovsky, P.G. On some problems of studying the history of astronomy, 13-28.Google Scholar

Veselovsky, I.N. The origin of Copernicus ‘De Revolutionibus’, 29-53.Google Scholar

Tchenakal, V.L. The astronomical instruments of D. Bird in Russia in the 18th century, 54-120.Google Scholar

Denisov, A.P. N.G. Kurganov—outstanding 18th century Russian astronomer, 121-93.Google Scholar

Rabinovich, I.M. and Apinis, A.A. On the history of the heliocentric theory in Latvia, 194-211.Google Scholar

Perel, J.G. and Radovsky, M.I. From the history of the scientific relations between Russian and American astronomers, 211-50.Google Scholar

Gaposhkin, S. When did Newton discover the law of universal gravitation? 251-5.Google Scholar

Tumanian, B.E. Lunar index, 256-62.Google Scholar

Klado, T. N. From the history of observations of changes on the Moon, 263-78.Google Scholar

Maistrov, L. Je. and Prosvirkina, S.K. Russian wooden calendars, 279-300.Google Scholar

Oresme, N. Mathematical-astronomical treatise. Introduction by V. P. Subov, 301-400.Google Scholar

Letters of W. Struve to S. S. Uvarov and P. N. Fuss. Publication by Kulikovsky, P. G., 401-16.Google Scholar

Selected bibliography of literature on the history of astronomy published in the U.S.S.R. and other countries in 1957-9 (Perel, J. G.), 417-20.Google Scholar

Ebizawa, A. Researches on the traditions of Portuguese studies in Japan (monograph), 1958.Google Scholar

Hirose, H. On the early determinations of longitude in Japan. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai (Dutch studies) no. 39, 1959.Google Scholar

Hirose, H. Bronze celestial globe, made by Yasui Harumi (Astronomer of 17th century) Tenmon Sôhô 13, 1959.Google Scholar

Hirose, H. On the theory of earth’s revolution among the astronomers of Yedo period. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 60, 1960.Google Scholar

Imai, I. On the Tabula Climatum in the Nigi—Ryakusetu. Nippon Tenmon Kenkyûkai Hôbun, 2, 1958.Google Scholar

Imai, I. Celestial globes described in the Kômô Tenti Nizu-Zeisetu, Tenmon Sôhô, 13, 1959.Google Scholar

Imai, I. On the celestial and terrestial globes reserved in Matuura Historical Museum, Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 62, 1960.Google Scholar

Imoto, S. and Hasegawa, I. Historical records of meteor showers in China, Korea and Japan. Smithson. Contr. Astrophys. 2, no. 6, 1958.Google Scholar

Yabuuti, K. Researches on the Shih Shên’s star catalogue related to the astronomical instruments of the Han Dynasty. Tôhô Gakuhô, no. 30, 1959.Google Scholar

Kanda, S. Bibliography of astronomical books written by European learning in Yedo period. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 57, 1960.Google Scholar

Maeyama, Z. L’astronomie of La Lande and the astronomical tables of Kansei and Tenpô. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 39, 1959.Google Scholar

Maeyama, L. Dutch studies of Takahasi Yositoki, an astronomer of Yedo period. Rep. Rangaku Siryô Kenkyûkai, no. 60, 1960.Google Scholar

Mita, H. Kant’s cosmogony and atomic theory. Kobe Univ. Rep., 1959.Google Scholar

Saegusa, H. Sir Isaac Newton in past two centuries of Japan. Yokohama Univ. Rep. 10, 1958.Google Scholar

Mitsumoto, J. The History of Astronomy in Japan for the last 100 Years. (The history of modern science for the last 100 years). Sidzen 13, no. 1, 88, 1958.Google Scholar

Aiton, E.J. The Vortex Theory of the Planetary Motions.Google Scholar

Aiton, E.J. I. Ann. Sci. 13, 249-64, 1957.Google Scholar

Aiton, E.J. II. Ann. Sci. 14, 132-47, 1958.Google Scholar

Aiton, E.J. III. Ann. Sci. 14, 157-72, 1958.Google Scholar

Andrade, E.N. da C. Doppler and the Doppler Effect. Endeavour 18, 14-9, 1959.Google Scholar

Armitage, A. William Ball, F.R.S. (1627-90). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 167-72, 1960.Google Scholar

Blackwell, D.E. The Zodiacal Light and its Interpretation. Endeavour 19, 14-9, 1960.Google Scholar

Botley, C.M. Two Cometary Centenaries. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 68, 322-4, 1958.Google Scholar

Botley, C.M. The Discovery of Sirius B. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 177, 1959.Google Scholar

Botley, C.M. Dates to Remember. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 220-22, 1959.Google Scholar

Botley, C.M. Aurorae seen in Daylight. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 222-6, 1959.Google Scholar

Eggen, O.J. An Eighteenth Century Discussion of Algol. Observatory 77, 191-7, 1957.Google Scholar

Eggen, O.J. A Clock Paradox—1794 Style. Observatory 78, 126-7, 1958.Google Scholar

Eggen, O.J. Flamsteed and Halley. Oce. Notes R. astr. Soc. 3, no. 20, 211-21, 1958.Google Scholar

Faulkner, R.O. Meteors in Ancient Egypt. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 68, 216-7, 1958.Google Scholar

Heath, T. Aristarchus of Samos. Reprinted. (Oxford, 1959).Google Scholar

Heathcote, N.H. de V. and Armitage, A. The First International Polar Year (1882-3). Pp. 6-100—French translation pp. 105-203—of Annals of the International Geophysical Year 1, 1959).Google Scholar

Hoskin, M. William Herschel. (London, Sheed & Ward, 1959).Google Scholar

Josten, C.H. Elias Ashmole, F.R.S. (1617-92). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 221-30, 1960.Google Scholar

Laurie, P.S. The Greenwich Time Ball. Observatory 78, 113-15, 1958 (See also Observatory 78, 212, 1958).Google Scholar

Laurie, P.S. The Buildings and Old Instruments of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. Observatory 80, 13–22, 1960.Google Scholar

Needham, J. Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 3: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. (Cambridge, 1959).Google Scholar

Ronan, C.A. Laurence Rooke (1622-62). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 113-18, 1960.Google Scholar

Ronan, C. A. and Hartley, H. SirPaul Neile, F.R.S. (1613-86). Notes Roy. Soc. 15, 159-65, 1960.Google Scholar

Schove, D.J. and Ho, P.Y. Chinese Aurorae: I, A.D. 1048-70. J. Brit. astr. Ass. 69, 295–304, 1959.Google Scholar

Steavenson, W.H. The Instruments of Sir William Herschel. MNRAS 119, 449-54, 1959.Google Scholar

Tebbutt, C.F. John Wheatley. Observatory 78, 19–20, 1958.Google Scholar