Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:06:29.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report of the Joint Working Party on Discrimination in Insurance and Pensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2014

Get access

Extract

The Working Party was set up by the Institute of Actuaries' Research Committee. Subsequently the Faculty of Actuaries nominated J. P. Batting as a member, and M. C. Corbould of the International Department of the Association of British Insurers was invited to join the Working Party in view of his extensive involvement with the European insurance associations and relevant Common Market Directives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Submission of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries to the Sub-Committee on Equality Rights of the Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, July 1985.Google Scholar
(2) Sex as a Rating Factor in Automobile Insurance by the Los Angeles Chapter of C.P.C.U., published in ‘In Pursuit of Excellence: a C.P.C.U. Research Anthology,” 1985.Google Scholar
(3) Submission by the Institute of Actuaries of Australia to the Human Rights Commission, December 1984.Google Scholar
(4) Human Rights Commission Report no. 19 on Superannuation, October 1986.Google Scholar
(5) Report on Sex Discrimination and Insurance to the Human Rights Commission, T.P.F. &; C. Consulting Actuaries, April 1986.Google Scholar
(6) Thurnham, A. T. (1986) Sex Discrimination in U.K. Pension Schemes—the impact of E.E.C. Law. Pensions World.Google Scholar
(7) Carter, R. L. (1987) Freedom to Offer Life Assurance Across E.E.C. State Boundaries.Google Scholar
(8) An Actuarial Study of Mortality within Countries of the European Communities, Groupe Consultatif des Associations d'Actuaires des Pays des Communautés Européenes, 1986.Google Scholar
(9) Report on the Zone Insurance Company Ltd., Commission for Racial Equality, 1981.Google Scholar
(10) Legislating for Change? Equal Opportunities Commission, October 1986.Google Scholar
(11) McGoldrick, A. E. (1984) Equal Treatment in Occupational Pension Schemes. Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
(12) Bosanquet, N. (1987) A Generation in Limbo, Public Policy Centre.Google Scholar
(13) Flexible Retirement Age. Working Group “Flexible Retirement Age”, Netherlands. Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries, 1984.Google Scholar
(14) Abbott, W. M. (1984) Discrimination in Private Car Insurance in the United Kingdom. Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries.Google Scholar
(15) ‘It's not your business, it's how the society works.’ Equal Opportunites Commission, 1978.Google Scholar
(16) Sex Equality and Credit-scoring: Guidance on the Elimination of Sex Bias from Credit-scoring Systems. Equal Opportunities Commission, January 1986.Google Scholar
(17) Reform of Social Security. H.M. Stationery Office Cmnd 9517, 1985.Google Scholar
(18) Third Report from the Social Services Committee on Age of Retirement. H.M.Stationery Office, 1982.Google Scholar
(19) Benjamin, B. (1981) Variation of Mortality in the United Kingdom with Special Reference to Immigrants and Minority Groups. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium of the Eugenics Society.Google Scholar
(20) Fox, A. J. and Goldblatt, P. O. (1982) Longitudinal Study socio-demographic mortality differentials. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Series LS no. 1.Google Scholar
(21) Fox, A. J. and Goldblatt, P. O. (1978) Household mortality from the OPCS Longitudinal Study. Population Trends vol. 14.Google Scholar