Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:33:34.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thailand Trapped: Catch-up Legacies and Contemporary Malaise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2018

Veerayooth Kanchoochat
Veerayooth Kanchoochat*
Affiliation:
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Japan; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A better understanding of Thailand's contemporary malaise needs a perspective that combines political and economic aspects without losing sight of history. This article applies the concept of path dependence to examine how pre-1997 catch-up industrialisation shaped the post-crisis trajectory. It argues that the catch-up process has left a number of important legacies, especially the symbiotic relationship between the military, banking conglomerates, and technocrats; dominant growth narrative with a focus on macroeconomic stability; and overly centralised and bloated state structures. These legacies have shaped the strategies and legitimacies of today's political actors and rendered the pursuit of growth increasingly contradictory to maintaining order.

Keywords

ThailandCatch-upPath DependenceEconomic GrowthSarit Thanarat
Type
Article
Information
TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , July 2018 , pp. 253 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Institute for East Asian Studies, Sogang University 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achakorn, Wongpreedee, and Chandra, Mahakanjana. 2011. “Decentralization and local governance in Thailand.” In Public Administration in Southeast Asia, edited by Berman, Evan M., 53–78. Broken Sound Parkway NW: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ammar, Siamwala. 2011. “Thailand after 1997.” Asian Economic Policy Review 6(1): 68–85.Google Scholar
Arunee, Santhitiwanich, and Bidhya, Bowornwathana. 2014. “Political strategy of senior bureaucrats in structural expansion in Thailand.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 4(5): 182–189.Google Scholar
Asia, Foundation. 2014. Profile of the ‘Bangkok Shutdown’ Protestors. Bangkok: Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
Atchaka, Sibunruang. 1986. Industrial Development Policies in Thailand. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ayal, Eliezer. 1961. “Some crucial issues in Thailand's economic development.” Pacific Affairs 34(2): 157–164.Google Scholar
Baker, Chris, and Pasuk, Phongpaichit. 2009. A History of Thailand (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2009. “An approach to comparative analysis or a subfield within a subfield? Political economy.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Lichbach, M. and Zuckerman, A., 193–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charoensin-o-larn, Chairat. 2010. “Thailand in 2009: Unusual politics becomes usual.” Southeast Asian Affairs: 303–331.Google Scholar
Chambers, Paul. 2011. “Where agency meets structure: Understanding civil-military relations in contemporary Thailand.” Asian Journal of Political Science 19(3): 290–304.Google Scholar
Chambers, Paul. 2013. “Economic guidance and contestation: An analysis of Thailand's evolving trajectory of development.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 32(1): 81–109.Google Scholar
Christensen, Scott, and Siamwalla, Ammar. 1994. “Muddling toward a miracle: Thailand and East Asian growth.” TDRI Quarterly Review 9(2): 13–19.Google Scholar
Charumirind, Chutathong, Kali, Raja, and Wiwattanakantang, Yupana. 2002. “Crony lending: Thailand before the financial crisis.” Center for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series No. 2002-4, Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
Connor, Michael. 2003. Democracy and National Identity in Thailand. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard. 2009. The Politics of Uneven Development: Thailand's Economic Growth in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard, and Ansil, Ramsay. 1997. “Competitive clientelism and economic governance: The case of Thailand.” In Business and the State in Developing Countries, edited by Maxfield, S. and Schneider, B., 237–276. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard, and Ben Ross, Schneider. 2016. “The middle-income trap: More politics than economics.” World Politics 68(4): 608–644.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard, Bryan, Ritchie, and Dan, Slater. 2005. “Systemic vulnerability and the origins of developmental states: Northeast and Southeast Asia in comparative perspective.” International Organization 59(2): 327–361.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, Rudiger, Park, Yung Chul, Collins, Susan M., and Vittorio, Corbo. 1987. “Korean growth policy.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 18(2): 389–454.Google Scholar
Dressel, Björn. 2010. “Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Considerations from recent events in Thailand.” The Pacific Review 23(5): 671–691.Google Scholar
Duangmanee, Laovakul. 2016. “Concentration of land and other wealth in Thailand.” In Unequal Thailand: Aspects of Income, Wealth, and Power, edited by Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, C.. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter, and James E., Rauch. 1999. “Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of ‘Weberian’ state structures on economic growth.” American Sociological Review 64(5): 748–765.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Nicholas. 2013. “Why democracy struggles: Thailand's elite coup culture.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 67(3): 281–296.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Federico. 2015. The Political Development of Modern Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Andrew, and Peter, Leyland. 2011. The Constitutional System of Thailand: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2006. “Constructivist institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, R., Binder, S., and Rockman, B., 56–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heo, Yoon. 2001. “Development strategy in Korea reexamined: An interventionist perspective.” The Social Science Journal 38: 217–231.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 1989. Bankers and Bureaucrats: Capital and the Role of the State in Thailand. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2006. “Thailand: Boom, bust and recovery.” In The Political Economy of South-East Asia. Markets, Power and Contestation, edited by Rodan, G., Hewison, K., and Robison, R., 74–108. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2010. “Thaksin Shinawatra and the reshaping of Thai politics.” Contemporary Politics 16(2): 119–133.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin, and Kengkij, Ktirianglarp. 2010. “Thai-style democracy: The royalist struggle for Thailand's politics.” In Saying the Unsayable: Monarchy and Democracy in Thailand, edited by Ivarsson, S. and Isager, L., 179–202. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.Google Scholar
Jeon, Jei Guk. 1995. “Exploring the three varieties of East Asia's state-guided development model: Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan.” Studies in Comparative International Development 30(3): 70–88.Google Scholar
Lauridsen, Laurid. 1998. “The financial crisis in Thailand: Causes, conduct, consequences.” World Development 26(8): 1575–1591.Google Scholar
Lauridsen, Laurid. 2008. State, Institutions and Industrial Development. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Lauridsen, Laurid. 2009. “The policies and politics of industrial upgrading in Thailand during the Thaksin Era (2001–2006).” Asian Politics and Policy 1(3): 409–434.Google Scholar
Lowndes, Vivien, and Mark, Roberts. 2013. Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Kathleen, Thelen. 2010. “A theory of gradual institutional change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K., 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2005. “Network monarchy and legitimacy crises in Thailand.” The Pacific Review 18(4): 499–519.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2008. “Thailand: State of anxiety.” Southeast Asian Affairs 1: 333–356.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2014. “Competing notions of judicialization in Thailand.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 36(3): 417–441.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 2015. “Thailand in 2014: The trouble with magic swords.” Southeast Asian Affairs (1): 335–358.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan, and Ukrist, Pathmanand. 2005. The Thaksinization of Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Ockey, James. 2007. “Thailand in 2006: Retreat to military rule.” Asian Survey 47(1): 133–140.Google Scholar
Ockey, James. 2014. “Thailand in 2013.” Asian Survey 54(1): 39–46.Google Scholar
Ohno, Kenichi, ed. 2006. Industrial Policy Formulation in Thailand, Malaysia and Japan. Vietnam: Vietnam Development Forum.Google Scholar
Painter, Martin. 2006. “Thaksinisation or managerialism? Reforming the Thai bureaucracy.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 36(1): 26–47.Google Scholar
Parsons, Craig. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit. 2016. “Inequality, wealth and Thailand's politics.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 405–424.Google Scholar
Pasuk, Phongpaichit, and Baker, C.. 2008. “Thaksin's populism.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1): 62–83.Google Scholar
Pavin, Chachavalpongpun. 2011. “The necessity of enemies in Thailand's troubled politics.” Asian Survey 51(6): 1019–1041.Google Scholar
Prajak, Kongkirati. 2016. “The failed 2014 election: Anti-election movement, street violence and the democratic breakdown.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 467–485.Google Scholar
Pye, Oliver, and Wolfram, Schaffar. 2008. “The 2006 anti-thaksin movement in Thailand: An analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1): 38–61.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saichol, Sattayanurak. 2005. “The construction of mainstream thought on ‘Thainess’ and the ‘Truth’ constructed by Thainess.” Mimeo translated to English by Sarinee Achavanuntakul. Available at: http://www.thaimissions.info/gsdl/collect/thaimiss/index/assoc/HASH0182/3bba5980.dir/doc.pdf (accessed 10 May 2018).Google Scholar
Schneider, Friedrich, Andreas, Buehn, and Claudio E., Montenegro. 2010. “New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world.” International Economic Journal 24(4): 443–461.Google Scholar
Silcock, Thomas. 1967. Thailand: Social and Economic Studies in Development. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Somchai, Jitsuchon. 2012. “Thailand in a middle-income trap.” TDRI Quarterly Review 27(2): 13–20.Google Scholar
Suehiro, Akira. 2014. “Technocracy and Thaksinocracy in Thailand: Reforms of the public sector and the budget system under the Thaksin Government.” Southeast Asian Studies 3(2): 299–344.Google Scholar
Thak, Chaloemtiarana. 1979. Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism. Bangkok: Social Science Association.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pongsudhirak, Thitinan. 2001. “Crisis from Within: The Politics of Macroeconomic Management in Thailand, 1947–97.” PhD diss., London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Ünaldi, Serhat. 2015. “The coup one year on: Thailand's ugly German Constitution.” Asia Policy Brief 2015/02. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/73887/1/2015.2_e.pdf (accessed 10 May 2018).Google Scholar
Kanchoochat, Veerayooth. 2015. “The middle-income trap and East Asian miracle lessons.” In Rethinking Development Strategies after the Global Financial Crisis, edited by Calcagno, A. et al. , 55–66. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
Kanchoochat, Veerayooth. 2017. “Tigers at critical junctures: How South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore survived growth-led conflicts.” Paper presented at the ESP Workshop on Developmental State-building, GRIPS, Tokyo, 20 June.Google Scholar
Kanchoochat, Veerayooth, and Hewison, Kevin, eds. 2017. Military, Monarchy and Repression: Assessing Thailand's Authoritarian Turn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warr, Peter. 1993. “The Thai economy.” In The Thai Economy in Transition, edited by Warr, P., 1–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warr, Peter. 2011. “Thailand's development strategy and growth performance.” UNU-WIDER Working Paper no. 2011/02.Google Scholar
Warr, Peter. 2014. “Thai populism and the middle-income trap.” In The Open Society and Its Enemies in East Asia: The Relevance of the Popperian Framework, edited by Moore, G., 67–77. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
World, Bank. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Washington: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World, Bank. 2011. Thailand Economic Monitor. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xiaoke. 2002. The Changing Politics of Finance in Korea and Thailand: From Deregulation to Debacle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar