Article contents
Instrumental Culturalism: The Work of Comparisons across Japan, ‘the West’ and Myanmar†
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2017
Abstract
As ‘emerging donors' push alternative paradigms of development cooperation ‘beyond aid' onto the global agenda, some scholars discuss those from Asia as presenting culturally specific approaches. These observations echo the claims that aid practitioners and policy makers themselves make about, for example, Japanese forms of development. In this article, I caution against scholars repeating these culturally essentialising arguments that promote certain political interests. Instead, I propose that we ‘take seriously' these aid actors’ instrumental culturalist views as ethnographic artefacts—that is, as logics and practices that our interlocutors use. By taking what I call instrumental culturalism as the object of study, rather than the analytical frame, this article shows that the work of comparisons plays a central role in producing culturalist worldviews. In short, culturalism is performative, creating that which it names. If we are to understand the “beyond aid” agenda, we need to attend to the ways that the production of culturalisms through the work of comparisons informs development actors’ understandings of social organisation and global interaction.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 27 - 45
- Copyright
- Copyright © Institute for East Asian Studies, Sogang University 2017
Footnotes
Abstract and keywords have been added since original publication. An erratum notice detailing this change was also published (doi: 10.1017/trn.2017.21).
References
A correction has been issued for this article:
- 2
- Cited by
Linked content
Please note a has been issued for this article.