No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2017
1 Edited by Vosté, J. M., CSCO, Scr. Syri, ser. IV, t. III (1940).Google Scholar
2 Richard, M., “Acace de Mélitène, Proclus de Constantinople et la Grande Arménie,’ Mémorial Louis Petit (Bucharest 1948) 393–412.Google Scholar
3 Cf. Devreesse's Index, p. 432, s.v. ‘Porphyre.’ Google Scholar
4 “The book of the bee,’ ed. Wallis Budge, E. A., Anecdota Oxoniensia, Semitic Series 2 (Oxford 1886) 151; transl. 132.Google Scholar
5 PO 4.379, 5.289.Google Scholar
6 St. Methodius, , Orat. in S. Thecl. 9 (PG 18.137A-B).Google Scholar
7 Basil. Seleuc. Mirac. S. Thecl. 16, 24–27 (PG 85.608A ff.).Google Scholar
8 Cf. Gordon, C. H., “Azitawadd's Phoenician Inscription,’ Journal of Near-Easten Studies 8 (1949) 108–115; Marcus, R. and Gelb, I. J., ‘The Phoenician Stele Inscription from Cilicia,’ ibid. 116-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Cf. Tisserant, E., art. “Philoxène de Mabboug,’ DThC 12 (Paris 1935) 1512–1513.Google Scholar
10 See Schwartz, Eduard, “Publizistische Sammlungen zum acacianischen Schisma, Abhandl. Bayer. Akad. d. Wiss. N. F. 10 (1934) 240 n.6.Google Scholar
11 Op. cit. 297 Google Scholar
12 Severus Antiochen. Epist. 69 (PO 14.101 [271]).Google Scholar
13 On p. 42 the article by Abramowski, R., Zeitschrift f. d. neutestam. Wiss. 33 (1934) 66–84 was perhaps worth mentioning.Google Scholar
14 I have noticed only the following: p. 220 ‘448’ instead of ‘548’; p. 133 n. 1 the word ‘quae illa’ should be deleted; p. 258 n. 2 and 429, Index s.v. ‘Jean Philopon,’ ‘Diatetes’ read ‘Diaetetes,’ as elsewhere correctly printed.Google Scholar