Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:22:09.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Manuscripts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Knut W. Nörr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following Notes are concerned with Summae of which editions have been undertaken by members of the Institute, or which otherwise have been discussed in previous issues of the Bulletin.

Type
Institute of Research and Study in Medieval Canon Law Bulletin for 1961
Information
Traditio , Volume 17 , 1961 , pp. 533 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Miscellen, (Beiträge zur mittelalterlichen Rechtsgeschichte 2; Berlin 1889) 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Fournier, P., ‘La bibliothèque de la Grande-Chartreuse au Moyen Age,’ Bulletin de l'Académie delphinoise 4 1 (1886) 382.Google Scholar

3 The early date is indicated by the entry on fol. 160v, see supra. Google Scholar

4 Cf. Kuttner, , ‘The Collection of Alanus …,’ Rivista di storia del diritto italiano 26 (1953) 40, 48.Google Scholar

5 The foregoing corrections for Trad. 13.467–8 are also to be applied to Ochoa, op. cit 121, 126 (Melk).Google Scholar

6 Zur Inventarisierung der kanonistischen Handschriften aus der Zeit von Gratian bis. Gregor IX. (Appendix to the revised reprint of ‘Des Johannes Galensis Apparat zur Compilatio III …’ from AKKR 118; Mainz 1939) 86–7.Google Scholar

7 The three references are (cf. Gillmann, AKKR 109.264 n.): ‘inno, infra de iure iurando in ber. Super consultatione lib. iii.’; ‘infra de iure iu. Super consultatione in ber.’; ‘inno. extra t(itulos) in bernardi compostell. compilatione Super consultatione § Quod uero.’ Oddly enough, this is the ‘Super consultatione’ which Bernard rejected as spurious in his epilogue (ed. Singer, p. 114) and whose two parts are actually read only in Alanus W 2.13.8 (A 2.15.10) and W 4.11.3 (A —). The first piece was printed as an appendix by Singer p. 116, the second (§ Quod uero) only by Heckel p. 286; it appears also under the name of Alexander III in Alanus W app. 108, but was overlooked by Cheney, C. R. in his discussion of ‘Super consultatione,’ Trad. 15.482–3.Google Scholar

8 Some evidence for this statement, from the App. X 1.21.2–3, will be presented in a forthcoming article, to appear in Medieval Studies Presented to Aubrey Gwynn S.J. (Dublin 1961).Google Scholar

9 App. X v. utitur baculo: ‘Quia baculus … accipit. vinc.’ propter ystoriam: ‘Martialis unus ex discipulis … morbida lenta.’ (Paris lat. 3967 fol. 36vb). But this gloss appears in turn as the second-last in App. III, and there are also MSS of the latter where it is referred to the words utitur baculo (instead of mysticam rationem); thereby the sequence becomes inverted, as in App. X.Google Scholar

10 Codicum Cassinensium mss. catalogus I (1915) 119; cf. also Bibliotheca Casinensis III (1887) 228; Trifone, R., ‘Il codice cassinese 136 e la sua importanza …,’ Casinensia 2 (1929) 374, where the reading ‘Quoniam iuste petentium …’ is given.Google Scholar

* Diese und die folgende Note (VI) beruhen auf Untersuchungen der Mikrofilmbestände des Instituts während meines Aufenthalts in Washington.Google Scholar

1 Vgl. Post, G., in The Jurist 2 (1942) 5–31; St. Kuttner, in Traditio 1 (1943) 287 n. 46; Garc, A.ía García, Laurentius Hispanus (Rom-Madrid 1956) 79–87.Google Scholar