Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:30:51.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hincmar of Rheims as a Theologian of the Trinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Leo Donald Davis
Leo Donald Davis*
Affiliation:
Gonzaga University Spokane, Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In one of the very few essays in English on Hincmar, archbishop of Rheims, Eleanor Shipley Duckett calls him a prince of the Church, a statesman, an administrator, a scholar who rises far above the other figures she surveys and who stands out in the company of Charles the Great and Pope Nicholas I in the historical records of the ninth century. His long life, from his birth in northern France in 806, his entry into the monastery of St. Denis in 814, his consecration as archbishop in 845, to his death in 882 at Epernay while fleeing from the Danish invasion, was one long series of combats calling for a variety of talents. He revealed a deep knowledge of canon law in his various ecclesiastical disputes with recalcitrant clergy and laity, an astute diplomatic talent in his attempts to knit together the rapidly unraveling unity of the empire, a broad but unoriginal scholarship in his theological controversies over predestination and the Trinity which brought him to grips with the leading thinkers of the Carolingian renaissance, especially the redoubtable Saxon Gottschalk, monk of Orbais. It is with this last controversy that this paper will be concerned.

Type
Miscellany
Information
Traditio , Volume 27 , 1971 , pp. 455 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shipley Duckett, Eleanor, Carolingian Portraits (Ann Arbor 1962) 202.Google Scholar

2 PL 125. 473-618 (in the edition of Jacques Sirmond, S.J., 1645). Google Scholar

3 Quoted in Jean Jolivet, Godescalc d'Orbais et la Trinité (Paris 1958) 82.Google Scholar

4 Manitius, Manitius, Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters I (Munich 1923) 340.Google Scholar

5 Amann, E., L'Époque carolingienne (Paris 1937) 337 n. 6.Google Scholar

6 Jolivet, Jean, op. cit. 82–83.Google Scholar

7 See his hymn, Panis Angelicus in which he takes a whole line from the Carolingian hymn for Vespers — Te trina Deitas unaque poscimus. Google Scholar

8 PL 125.475ab. Google Scholar

9 PL 125.500b. Google Scholar

10 PL 125.475b. Google Scholar

11 PL 125.476c. Google Scholar

12 PL 125.476b. Google Scholar

13 PL 125.530d. Google Scholar

14 PL 125.540d. Google Scholar

15 PL 125.475b. Google Scholar

16 PL 125.536c. Google Scholar

17 PL 125.476c. Google Scholar

18 PL 125.550d. Google Scholar

19 PL 125.554a. Google Scholar

20 PL 125.483a. Google Scholar

21 PL 125.484a. Google Scholar

22 PL 125.503b. Google Scholar

23 PL 125.482d. Google Scholar

24 PL 125.481d. Google Scholar

25 PL 125.484a. Google Scholar

26 PL 125.595c. Google Scholar

27 PL 125.596c. Google Scholar

28 PL 125.596d. Google Scholar

29 PL 125.484b. Google Scholar

30 PL 125.485a. Google Scholar

31 PL 125.525a. Google Scholar

32 PL 125.484a. Google Scholar

33 PL 125.484b. Google Scholar

34 PL 125.525c. Google Scholar

35 For a convenient summary of the events surrounding and during this Council, see Philip Hughes, The Church in Crisis (Garden City 1961) 133 ff.Google Scholar

36 PL 125.489b. Google Scholar

37 Ambrose, , De fide; Augustine, De Trinitate; Jerome, Letter to Damasus; Theophilus Alexandrinus, Paschal Letters 1, 3, 9; Coelestine, Letter 6 to John of Antioch; Leo, Letters to Theodorus, Bishops of Palestine, and Leo of Ravenna; Gregory the Great, Homily 18 and 24 on the Gospel, Homily 16 on Ezechiel; Prosper, Epigrams; Bede, Homilies; Athanasius (Pseudo), De fidei unitate, De Trinitate; Hilary, De synodis, De Trinitate; Gregory Nazianzen as quoted by Augustine.Google Scholar

38 PL 125.512b. Google Scholar

39 PL 125.515a. Google Scholar

40 PL 125.518d. Google Scholar

41 PL 125.518b. Google Scholar

42 PL 125.580b. See too Jolivet, , op. cit. 38–40.Google Scholar

43 PL 125.526c. Google Scholar

44 PL 125.526a. Google Scholar

45 PL 125.584c. Google Scholar

46 PL 125.566b. As the source of his doctrine, Hincmar gives certain Arithmetici (521b) and those who dispute about numbers (566a) and Boethius (526a). Evidently this was a mathematieo-grammatical theory of the time. Google Scholar

47 PL 125.568ab. Google Scholar

48 PL 125.566c. Google Scholar

49 PL 125.588. The distinction that Hincmar is groping for is that between material numbers founded on the multiplication of material things and transcendental numbers founded on being and negation. See Bernard Lonergan, Divinarum Personarum Conceptio Analogica (Rome 1959) 145.Google Scholar

50 PL 125.499cd. Google Scholar

51 PL 125.533b. Google Scholar

52 PL 125.489b. Google Scholar

53 PL 125.520d. Google Scholar

54 PL 125.526b. Google Scholar

55 PL 125.491c. Google Scholar

56 PL 125.533b. Google Scholar

57 PL 125.524c. Google Scholar

58 PL 125.478c. Google Scholar

59 PL 125.586c. Google Scholar

60 PL 125.581c. Google Scholar

61 PL 125.585d. Google Scholar

62 PL 125.583c. Google Scholar

63 PL 125.601bc. Google Scholar

64 See Jolivet, op. cit. 85 ff. Google Scholar

65 PL 125.587d-588a. Google Scholar

66 PL 125.580b and 581c. Google Scholar

67 PL 125.580c. Google Scholar

68 PL 125.580d. Google Scholar

69 Another indication of Gottschalk's tendency to make substance a logical category is his use of ex trinitate which Jolivet, op. cit. 79 notes is used to denote a subject's relation to species or to matter. Google Scholar

70 PL 125.517c-518a. Google Scholar

71 PL 125.488b. Google Scholar

72 PL 125.575d. Google Scholar

73 PL 125.517c. Google Scholar

74 PL 125.550d. Google Scholar

75 PL 125.553d. Google Scholar

76 PL 125.554d. Google Scholar

77 PL 125.557bc. Google Scholar

78 PL 125.555cd. Google Scholar

79 PL 125.536c and 540cd. Google Scholar

80 PL 125.505a. Google Scholar

81 PL 125.541a. Google Scholar

82 PL 125.536d and 538ab. Hincmar admits that he knows no Greek (538a) and that even those who do have trouble reading the codices (538b). His Greek Fathers are quoted from the Latin acts of the Council of Constantinople III. His use of Greek numbers he gets from Sophronius of Jerusalem quoted in the acts of the above Council. His use of Greek theological terminology he borrows from Jerome. He mentions a series of Greek Fathers but quotes only one of them, Gregory of Nazianzen, from one of Augustine's works. Google Scholar

83 PL 125.479c. Google Scholar

84 Donatus, , Ars Grammatica, in H. Keil, Grammatici Latini (Leipzig 1857-80) IV 376, and Priscian, Institutiones, in H. Keil, op. cit. II 175.Google Scholar

85 PL 125.574bc. Google Scholar