^{page 237 note 1} Karl Jost, “Einige Wulfstantexte und ihre Quellen,” Anglia 56 (1932): 265–315, at 279–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 237 note 2} Dorothy Bethurum, “Archbishop Wulfstan's Commonplace Book,” PMLA 57 (1942): 916–29 at 923–24. Bethurum noted a number of manuscripts which she would regard as exemplifying a “Commonplace Book.” But if the term means a series of miscellaneous abstracts from larger works which are recorded for reference, some of these manuscripts should be deleted from the group, although they may still record Wulfstan's writing and suggest Wulfstan's reading. Certain manuscripts, however, fit the definition. These have sequences of normally brief items in common, although no one manuscript is a copy of another. These are Cambridge, Corpus Christi College 190 (Part A) (hereafter CCC 190); Cambridge, Corpus Christi College 265; Oxford, Bodleian Library, Barlow 37; and now Rouen, Bibliothèque Municipale 1382 (U. 109): see n. 7, below. Other manuscripts which also are collections for future reference but are not closely allied to the above group are Copenhagen, Royal Library Gl. Kgl. S. 1595, which contains mainly sermons and homiletic passages, and BL Cotton Nero A i, which contains a number of laws. Other manuscripts noted in this paper are obviously associated with Wulfstan in other ways.Google Scholar

^{page 237 note 3} Exeter, s. xi¹, for this section.Google Scholar

^{page 237 note 4} PL 134; L. d’Achery, Spicilegium (Paris, 1668), the first edition.Google Scholar

^{page 237 note 5} Joachim Bauer, “Die Schrift ‘De Pressuris Ecclesiasticis’ des Bischofs Atto von Vercelli: Untersuchung und Edition” (diss., Tübingen, 1975), cited hereafter as Bauer. Identifications of Atto's work in CCC 190 are presented with the edition at pp. vi-xiii. Bauer (v, n. 4) unfortunately associates CCC 190 with Wulfstan II, Bishop of Worcester, 1062–95.Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 6} Neil Ker, “The Handwriting of Archbishop Wulfstan,” England before the Conquest: Studies in Primary Sources Presented to Dorothy Whitelock, eds. Clemoes, Peter and Hughes, Kathleen (Cambridge, 1971), 315–31.Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 7} Cross, J.E., “A Newly Identified Manuscript of Wulfstan's ‘Commonplace Book’, Rouen, Bibliothèque Municipale, MS. 1382 (U. 109), fols. 173r-198v,” Journal of Medieval Latin 2 (1992): 63–83 at 69, and see below.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 238 note 8} Worcester or York, s.xi¹. The folio is presented in facsimile in Henry Loyn, A Wulfstan Manuscript Containing Institutes, Laws and Homilies, British Museum Cotton Nero A.I., Early English Manuscripts in Facsimile 17 (Copenhagen, 1971).Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 9} Ker, “Handwriting,” 326.Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 10} Worcester, s.xi^med.Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 11} Worcester? s.xii^ex or xiiiⁱⁿ; see Hans Sauer, “Zur Überlieferung und Anlage von Erzbischof Wulfstans ‘Handbuck’,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 36 (1980): 341–84 at 345.Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 12} Bethurum, Dorothy, The Homilies of Wulfstan (Oxford, 1957), 100.Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 13} Two Alcuin Letter-Books, from the British Museum MS Cotton Vespasian A XIV, ed. Colin Chase, Toronto Medieval Latin Texts 5 (Toronto, 1975), 43.Google Scholar

^{page 238 note 14} Die Irische Kanonensammlung, ed. Herrmann Wasserschleben, 2d ed. (Leipzig, 1885), 162: “Gregorius: Si quis ecclesiam Dei denudaverit, anathema sit.” The quotation in De rapinis (item 13 in the transcript below) is extended in the Ecclesia sponsa sermon with an insertion, “uel sanctimonia uiolauerit.” In view of this addition, we note that a manuscript of the ‘Irish Canon-Collection,’ BL Cotton Otto E xiii, fol. 128v (Canterbury, St. Augustine's, s. x), follows the citation attributed to Gregory with a quotation of Paul, 1 Cor. 3:17: “Si quis violauerit templum Dei, disperdet ilium Deus.” Wulfstan used the quotation in the extended form of the Ecclesia sponsa sermon in his Institutes of Polity, as noted by Karl Jost, Die “Institutes of Polity, Civil and Ecclesiastical,” Swiss Studies in English 47 (Berne, 1959), 150, and also in some homilies as in Bethurum, Wulfstan's Homilies, Homily Xb, lines 41–43 (Latin), and Xc, lines 49–51 (Latin), translated into Old English at lines 51–54.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 15} Ker, “Handwriting,” 328.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 16} Ibid., 328–30.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 17} Cross, “Newly Identified Manuscript,” 69.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 18} Bethurum, “Commonplace Book” (as in n. 2), 923.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 19} Bethurum, , Wulfstan's Homilies, 324.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 20} Jost, , Die “Institutes of Polity,” p.146,1 Polity 107, II Polity 212 (in Old English); p.148, I Polity 111, II Polity 216 (in Old English) citing Latin in I Polity 112, II Polity 217. Jost regarded the immediate sources as the relevant Wulfstan homily.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 21} Bauer (as in n. 5), vi-x, with an omission of the sentence 2 in the transcript below (based on Atto), a misreading of igitur for ergo in 3, an omission of est at dampnandus est in 4, a misreading multitudinem for multum in 7, an omission of Item in 8, and a reading aecclesiam for ecclesia in the first citation from Jerome.Google Scholar

^{page 239 note 22} Ibid., x-xiii.Google Scholar

^{page 240 note 23} Bauer has one error of transcript where CCC 190 is in error in reading: coeternis, for Atto's caeteris. Bauer reads caeteris without indication of editorial emendation.Google Scholar

^{page 240 note 24} Bauer has one small error: et for ac in ‘Sanctus martyr Alexander ac Romanus papa.’Google Scholar

^{page 240 note 25} Bauer has errors in reading papa for propria (Atto also propria) in the description of Pope Pelagius, and fatigaret for fatigaretur in the reference to Pope Leo.Google Scholar

^{page 241 note 26} As edited by Benjamin Thorpe, Ancient Laws and Institutes of England, 2 vols. (London 1840), 2:97–127 at 104, no. 44; also Robin Ann Aronstam, “The Latin Canonical Tradition in Late Anglo-Saxon England: The Excerptiones Egberti” (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1974), 65, no. 25, where the source is noted as Canon apostolorum 30, PL 67: 144.Google Scholar

^{page 241 note 27} Bauer, 76.Google Scholar

^{page 242 note 28} Curiously, Bauer omits from his edition (p. 75), the phrase: “Sicut autem is qui inuitatus renuit … procul dubio repellendus,” which is in the PL edition, and in the source John the Deacon's Vita Gregorii S. (PL 75: 129). Bauer says that there is a lacuna in his manuscripts but restores only part of the citation from Gregory, as he says (p.76), from the editions. Surely his omission, on these grounds, is an oversight.Google Scholar

^{page 242 note 29} The Anglo-Saxon Pontificals, ed. H.M.J. Banting, HBS 104 (London, 1989), 16. We should note that a short section which immediately follows these two in the Egbert Pontifical, Ex concilio Calcidonense titulo II quod non debeant officio aecclestiasica per pecunias ordinare, ultimately from the Council of Chalcedon no. 2 (PL 67: 171), is also presented in CCC 190, pp. 106–7.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 1} Ecclesia … domina] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 88D; Bauer, 141; cf. De rapinis 11.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 2} decet … ipsis] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 88D; Bauer, 141; cf. De rapinis 11.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 3} Omnia … tolluntur] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 88c; Bauer, 139; cf. De rapinis 2.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 4} Quid … ecclesiam] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 88C-D; Bauer, 141; cf. De rapinis 6, and note the equivalence of word in contrast with Atto.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 5} Agustinus … diripit] Unidentified as Augustine, but cf. De rapinis 14, Wulfstan's own addition to Vespasian A xiv, fol. 173v.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 6} Legitur … permisit] Atto, DPE PL 134: 89c; Bauer, 143, with a little adaptation.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 7} Item … presumpsit] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 89B; Bauer, 143, with omission of some phrases of Atto.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 8} Item … permisit] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 89B; Bauer, 143.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 9} Quid … ecclesiam] An orator's question linking the preceding material with the succeeding answers from authority. Note the echo “qui Christi lacerant ecclesiam,” above n. 4.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 10} Adtendamus … uenti] Psalm 82:13–14 cited Atto, DPE, PL 134: 89D; Bauer, 145: cf. De rapinis 4.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 11} Omnis … domino] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 88B; Bauer, 139. Note exact echo of De rapinis 10 with added phrase: “uel dampnetur a domino.”Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 12} Canon Romanus … sumpserunt] Excerptiones Pseudo-Egberti, Aronstam (as in n. 26 above), 119, no. v almost verbatim. The item is found in CCC 265, p. 29; Barlow 37, fol. 3v; and Rouen 1382, fol. 187r.Google Scholar

^{page 245 note 13} Cristus … culpa] Excerptiones Pseudo-Egberti, Aronstam p. 120, no. vi almost verbatim. The item is found in CCC 265, p. 29; Barlow 37, fol. 3v; and Rouen 1382, fol. 187r.Google Scholar

^{page 246 note 14} Quid igitur? … pertingere] Unidentified, perhaps another linking passage.Google Scholar

^{page 246 note 15} Omnipotens … uicissitudinem] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 90A; Bauer, 145–47.Google Scholar

^{page 246 note 16} Quamuis … manifestissime] Atto, DPE, PL 134: 90B; Bauer, 147.Google Scholar

^{page 246 note 17} Intra … regnorum] Is. 47:5, cited Atto, DPE, PL 134: 90A; Bauer, 147.Google Scholar

^{page 246 note 18} Item … sua] Jer. 12:14 cited Atto, DPE, PL 134: 90A; Bauer, 145, cf. De rapinis n. 9.Google Scholar

^{page 246 note 19} Gregorius … Amen] see n. 14 of essay above; cf. De rapinis 13.Google Scholar