Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:55:32.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stephanus Hugoneti and his ‘Apparatus' on the Clementines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Norman P. Zacour
Norman P. Zacour*
Affiliation:
Franklin and Marshall College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Rare Book Room of the University of Pennsylvania Libraries has recently acquired an early fourteenth-century manuscript (Lat. 95) of a hitherto unknown Apparatus on the Clementines. The author is Stephanus Hugoneti (from southern France, possibly Narbonne), whose work as a canonist has gone unknown, and whose ultimate though brief emergence from historical obscurity as bishop of Bologna has hardly been noticed.

Type
Institute of Research and Study in Medieval Canon Law Bulletin for 1961
Information
Traditio , Volume 17 , 1961 , pp. 527 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Norman, Zacour, P., ‘A Catalogue of Manuscripts in the Libraries of the University of Pennsylvania to 1800,’ part II, in The Library Chronicle 27 (1961) 16.Google Scholar

2 Francisci Zabarelle Cardinalis commentarii in Clementinarum (Venice 1504) fol. 2, prohem.Google Scholar

3 See Schulte, , Geschichte der Quellen und Literatur II 200–201.Google Scholar

4 Ioannis Andreae … in Sextum decretalium librum Novella commentaria (Venice 1581) fol. 3v.Google Scholar

5 Guillaume Mollat (ed.), Jean XXII (1316–1334): Lettres communes analysées d'après les registres dits d'Avignon et du Vatican, 16 vols. (Paris 1904–1947); see 1.57 (no. 545); also nos. 790, 791, 792, 799, 806, 1879, 2404, 2858, 3076, 3583, 4027, 4105, 4113.Google Scholar

6 Ibid. 1.389 (no. 4236). 7 Ibid. 1.388 (no. 4224).Google Scholar

8 Ibid. 2.23 (no. 5750).Google Scholar

9 Ibid. 2.81 (no. 6373), 287 (no. 8483).Google Scholar

10 Ibid. 2.295 (no. 8575); the church of the monastery of Vabres was only made a cathedral less than a year earlier, on November 22, 1317; ibid. 2.40 (no. 5923). For another brief notice of Stephanus, who is referred to as a canon of Albi, see Barraclough, Geoffrey, Public Notaries and the Papal Curia (London 1934) 140, doc. 11.Google Scholar

11 Mollat, , Jean XXII : Lettres communes 2.397 (no. 9621).Google Scholar

12 Ibid. 2.456 (no. 10255); 3.59 (no. 10938).Google Scholar

13 Ibid. 3.224 (no. 12753).Google Scholar

14 Baluze, Etienne, Vitae paparum Avenionensium, hoc est historia pontificum Romanorum qui in Gallia sederunt , new ed. Mollat II, Guillaume (Paris 1927) 221 note 3; also Mollat, Jean XXII: Lettres communes 3.163 (no. 12176). On Bertrand's mission to northern Italy, see the pope's announcement in Auguste Coulon, Lettres secrètes et curiales du pape Jean XXII (1316–1334) relatives à la France (Paris 1900–13) 1.788–789 (no. 912); cf. 896–898 (nos. 1040, 1043), 954 (no. 1127), 960 (no. 1136); 2.38 (no. 1305), 165 (no. 1520), 342 (no. 1734). See also Mollat, Guillaume, Les papes d'Avignon (9th ed. Paris 1949) 158ff. Bertrand arrived in Asti around the end of August 1320 (Annales Mediolanenses xcii, in Muratori, RIS 16.698).Google Scholar

15 Mollat, Jean XXII: Lettres communes 3.178 (no. 12296); Annales Mediolanenses xcii (ed. Muratori, , RIS 16.696–697). This is only one episode in the long struggle between Pope John and the Visconti, which had many colorful and dramatic moments; see esp. Michel, Robert, ‘Le procès de Matteo et de Galeazzo Visconti: l'accusation de sorcellerie et d'hérésie; Dante et l'affaire de l'envoûtement ‘(1320),’ Mélanges d'archéologie et d'histoire 29 (1909) 269–327.Google Scholar

16 Mollat, Jean XXII: Lettres communes 4.347 (no. 18159).Google Scholar

17 Ibid. 5.226 (no. 20679). We may also note his presence in Bologna on August 28, 1328, when representatives of the banking house of the Bardi, acting on behalf of the papacy, turned over to Cardinal Bertrand the sum of 15,000 florins transmitted through them by the pope. See Schäfer, K. H., Die Ausgaben des apostolischen Kammer unter Johann XXII. nebst den Jahresbilanzen von 1316–1375 (Vatikanische Quellen zur Geschichte der päpstlichen Hof-und Finanzverwaltung 1316–1378, vol. 2; Paderborn 1911) 499, note 1.Google Scholar

18 Mollat, Jean XXII: Lettres communes 10.24 (no. 51084); Petrus de Fas, papal scriptor and Scambinus Carini, of the Florentine banking house of the Acciajuoli, made two payments of 250 florins each to the papal Camera on behalf of Stephanus in full payment of Stephanus’ obligations to the papacy on receipt of his bishopric (Emil Göller, Die Einnahmen der apostolischen Kammer unter Johann XXII. [Vatikanische Quellen … 1; Paderborn 1910] 250, 256).Google Scholar

19 Ciaccio, Lisetta, ‘Il cardinal legato Bertrando del Poggetto in Bologna (1327–1334),’ Atti e memorie della R. deputazione di storia patria per la provincie di Romagna, ser. 3, 22 (1904) 483–484 (this work was published as a book in Bologna, 1905, in which form it has not been available to me).Google Scholar

20 Mollat, Jean XXII: Lettres communes 11.206 (no. 57391); Alban, J. H.ès, Gallia Christiana novissima: Histoire des archevêchés, évêchés et abbayes de France 1 [Aix] (Montbeliard 1899) cols. 146–147, doc. 22.Google Scholar

21 Corpus chronicorum Bononiensium 2.419 (RIS2 18, new ed. by Sorbelli, Albano; Città di Castello 1912–1914); cf. Caroli Sigonii Historia de rebus Bononiensibus libri VIII, lib. III (p. 171) (Frankfurt 1604); the description of Stephanus is elaborated on by Celso Faleoni, Memorie historiche della chiesa Bolognese e suoi pastori (Bologna 1649) 347–348: ‘… un certo Stefano Agonetto di Narbona, Città del Delfinato … che in se stesso haveva cancellato i meriti della virtù. Da membri del suo corpo, giudicare facilmente si poteva, quali si fossero le doti dell'animo: al sicuro da Pitagorici non sarebbe stato ammesso, nella loro scuola. Era picciolo di statura, gobbo di spalle, aspro di costumi, avaro di ricchezze, come d'ingegno. Fù glorioso nel niente, che fece; anzi in quel poco, che non fece. La fama, dalle sue attion adirata, tarpò le sue penne per non volare, e quelle de scrittori per non dare pena in descriverle, e raccontarle. Se pure, ve ne fossero, il tempo di due anni fù un momento à ciò, che fece. La rozzezza di un marmo nella Cattedrale, fù proportionata alle sue rozze maniere, lo rinchiuse, accioche altro di lui non si cerchi, ò brami.’ Cf. also Cherubino Ghirardacci, Della historia di Bologna parte seconda (Bologna 1657) 95, in which there is preserved a memory of Stephanus’ learning (‘… il quale se ben era di buonissime lettere …’); and Ughelli, F., Italia sacra 2 (Rome 1647) 28, which has no kind words for Stephanus (‘… ob insuaves mores, illiberalem faciem, gibbosaeque personae dehonestamentum, Bononiensi populo invisus …’).Google Scholar

22 Corpus chron. Bonon. 2.421 (RIS2 18); also Matthaei de Griffonibus memoriale historicum de rebus Bononiensium 40 (RIS2 18, new ed. by Frati, Ludovico and Sorbelli, Albano; Città di Castello 1902).Google Scholar