Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:00:08.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Select Bibliography 1963-1964

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Institute of Medieval Canon Law: Bulletin for 1964
Information
Traditio , Volume 20 , 1964 , pp. 513 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, P. J., ‘The Donation of Constantine at Byzantium and Its Earliest Use against the Western Empire,’ Mélanges G. Ostrogorsky I (Recueil des travaux de l'Institut d'Études byzantines 8; Belgrade 1963) 11–26. No use at Byzantium before the latter half of the 12th c. Google Scholar
Guizard, †A., Artonne, † L., et Pontal, Odette, Répertoire des statuts synodaux des Diocèses de l'ancienne France du XIIIe à la fin du XVIIIe siècle. Le Bras, Préface de G. (Documents, Études et Répertoires publiés par l'Institut de Recherche et d'Histoire des Textes 11; Paris 1963). 516 pp. Arranged by dioceses and dates, with complete information on MSS (including inscriptions, incipits, explicits), editions, bibliography. Index of bishops and vicars (p. 499ff.).Google Scholar
Autenrieth, J., ‘Neuere Handschriftenkataloge und Hilfsmittel für die Katalogisierung,’ Zur Katalogisierung mittelalterlicher und neuerer Handschriften (Sonderheft der Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie; Frankfurt a. M. 1963) 74–85. For the proposal of a central file of initia see p. 84f. Google Scholar
Bacht, H., Bacht, S. J., ‘Hinkmar von Reims: Ein Beitrag zur Theologie des Allgemeinen Konzils,’ Unio Christianorum: Festschrift für Erzbischof Dr. Lorenz Jaeger (Paderborn 1962) 223–42. Discusses Hincmar's position concerning the Hadriana, Ps. Isidore, and the Ecumenical Councils (H. does not count Nicaea II).Google Scholar
Baldanza, G., ‘Il problema del consenso dei genitori al matrimonio dei figliuoli e la sua pratica soluzione nelle Decretali di Gregorio IX,’ Ephem. iuris can. 18 (1962) 351–75.Google Scholar
Bellini, P, L'obbligazione da promessa con oggetto temporale nel sistema canonistico classico (Università degli Studi di Roma: Monografie dell'Istituto di diritto pubblico N. S. 19; Milan 1964) 579 pp. (replaces a preliminary edition, Milan 1963, 430 pp.). Reexamines the canonistic doctrine of nuda promissio in a broad context of the general theory of law, moral and juridical obligation, lex civilis, denunciatio evangelica, jurisdiction in temporalibus, etc. on the basis of printed and MS sources.Google Scholar
Bertolini, O., ‘La collezione canonica beneventana del Vat. lat. 4939,’ Collectanea Albareda I 119–37. The collection in 28 cc. in the MS of the Liber preceptorum of S. Sofia, Benevento (fols. 16r-22v) is based on the Coll. 74 tit., Anselm of Lucca and Ans. ded. Edition pp. 128-37.Google Scholar
Betti, E., ‘Dottrina costruita da Bartolo sulla const. “Ad reprimendam”,’ Raccolta Jemolo IV 63–72.Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, M., ‘Una “quaestio” di Niccolò Matarelli (Vat. lat 10726),’ Collectanea Albareda I 139–57. On the school of Modena s. xiii ex. and the career of N. M.; analyzes Vat. lat. 5773 and 10726, from which one quaestio (‘an duo testes reprobent ystrumentum’) is edited pp. 151-7 Google Scholar
Bieler, L., ‘Patrick's Synod: a Revision,’ Mélanges offerts à Mlle Christine Mohrmann (Utrecht-Anvers 1963) 96–102. Argues for the substantial authenticity of the synod (Hadden-Stubbs II 2.328-31), as a joint episcopal letter, c. 457.Google Scholar
Bieler, L., (ed.), The Irish Penitentials. With an Appendix by Binchy, D. A. (Scriptores latini Hiberniae 5; Dublin 1963). x, 367 pp. An excellent new critical edition of the 15 extant Irish penitential texts from the so-called Synod of St. Patrick to the Paenitentiale Bigotianum, with English translations; followed by translations of two Old-Irish texts (A. Binchy, 258-83). Introduction (1-51), esp. on MS tradition, Latinity (see also notes, 240-57), and biblical versions used. Six indices, 285-367.Google Scholar
Boyle, ***., ‘The Curriculum of the Faculty of Canon Law at Oxford in the First Half of the Fourteenth Century,’ Oxford Studies Presented to D. A. Callus (Oxford 1964) 135–62. Analyzes the statuta antiqua on the licence to lecture, the course for the doctorate, quasi-ordinary teaching, the licence to incept, inception, and regency.Google Scholar
Brlek, M. O. F. M., ‘De momento conciliorum pro iuris ecclesiae formatione,’ Antonianum 38 (1963) 50–86.Google Scholar
van Caenegem, R.C., unter Mitarbeit von Ganshof, F. L., Kurze Quellenkunde des Westeuropäischen Mittelalters (Göttingen 1964). xiii, 365 pp. A revised translation of the original edition, Encyclopedie van de Geschiedenis der Middeleeuwen (Gent 1962).Google Scholar
Campitelli, A. and Liotta, Filippo, ‘Notizia del MS. Vat. lat. 8069,’ ASD 5-6 (1961-62; publ. 1963) 387–406. Analyzes the collection of consilia s. xiv-xv, correcting the earlier description of the MS by Vigneaux (1892). Annotated list of jurists represented (pp. 392-402); edition of four consilia by Baldus (403-6).Google Scholar
Caprioli, S., ‘De Modis arguendi scripta rariora (2-4),’ Studi Senesi3 12 (1963) 107–90, 230-53. (For No. 1 see this Bulletin for 1963). Edits the Summa Rainerii super modo arg. (Harvard Law School MS 75 and Vat. Ottob. lat. 1254); a de variis m. a. ‘secundum Iohannem Andreae et Iacobum de Arenis’ (Halle Ye fol. 68); a London fragment (BM Royal 10. B. IX).Google Scholar
Caprioli, S., ‘Tre capitoli intorno alla nozione di “regula iuris” nel pensiero dei glossatori,’ ASD 5-6 (1961-62; publ. 1963) 221–374. A detailed semasiological and doctrinal study of definitions and conceptions; regula iuris in relation to brocarda and generalia, to equitas; regula and exceptio. Important appendix of texts from the glossators of both laws (pp. 339ff.), including inter al. newly discovered anonymous material; a new critical edition of Bulgarus on Dig. 50.17.1; glosses of Rogerius, of Haenel's Apparatus Moguntinus (see next entry), of Bertram of Metz, etc.Google Scholar
Caprioli, S., ‘Habemus et Ioannem,’ ibid. 375–85. Assembles passages from the Apparatus Moguntinus (Mainz 20, fol. 1-4 [discovered by Haenel], complete text in Lambeth MS 139, fol. 3-22) which correspond to the quotations by Cujas from Johannes Bassianus on the De regulis iuris. Google Scholar
Castillo Lara, R., ‘El concepto del “notorium” desde Joannes Teutonicus hasta el Código de Derecho Canónico,’ Salesianum 24 (1962) 403–49.Google Scholar
Cenci, ***. O. F. M., ‘Constitutiones provinciales provinciae Umbriae anni 1316,’ Archivum Franciscanum historicum 56 (1963) 12–39.Google Scholar
Chavet, ***., ‘Aux origines de la prescription de cent ans (Cod. iur. can. c. 1511 § 1),’ Ephem. iur. can. 19 (1963) 152–66. Discusses Nov. Just. 9, 111, 131 and their subsequent history until Pope John VIII and the Auth. Quas actiones CJ 1.2.23.Google Scholar
Cheyette, ***, ‘Kings, Courts, Cures, and Sinecures; The Statute of Provisors and the Common Law,’ Traditio 19 (1963) 295–349.Google Scholar
Classen, P, ‘Gerhoh von Reichersberg und die Regularkanoniker in Bayern und Oesterreich,’ Vita comune I 304–40. See esp. for MSS of the Rule and statutes of canons regular, pp. 321-2, 333-6; edits a new text of Urban II, ‘De religione vestra’ (cf. Germ. Pont. 1.376 No. 3).Google Scholar
Concilia Galliae A. 511-695 ed. de Clercq, C. (CCSL 148A; Turnhout 1963). x, 426 pp. Follows Maassen's edition in MGH Conc. 1 (1893), with a modernized apparatus; new texts for Narbonne 589 and Auxerre 692/6.Google Scholar
Corpus consuetudinum monasticarum: see Gransden, Hallinger.Google Scholar
Dahyot-Dolivet, J., ‘Canons conciliaires et statuts diocésains de Lisieux depuis le début du xie siècle jusqu'au concile de Trente,’ Apollinaris 36 (1963) 110–26.Google Scholar
De Bernardis, L. M., ‘Note sul canone 31 del IV Concilio Lateranense,’ Vita comune II 13–15.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, V., ‘Error conditionis e fini del matrimonio,’ Raccolta Jemolo I 1.329–70. Includes discussion of the problem in classical canon law.Google Scholar
Del Re, N., ‘Il “Consilium pro Urbano VI” di Bartolomeo da Saliceto (Vat. lat. 5608),’ Collectanea Albareda I 213–63. This consilium in a miscellaneous codex s. xv (materials on the Schism and Constance, analyzed p. 223ff) is not identical with Salicetus' consilium in Vat. lat. 2660 (and other MSS; Savigny, , Geschichte VI 268); edition pp. 234-63.Google Scholar
Devisse, J., Hincmar et la loi (Université de Dakar, Fac. des Lettres et Sciences humaines; Section d'Histoire 5; Dakar 1962). 92 pp. (A) Les citations d'Hincmar: Carolingian law, Roman law; allusions and indirect citations; use of spuria (pp. 9ff.); (B) Les sources d'H: traces Carolingian MSS that are textually close to H's references (41ff.); (C) Hincmar et la loi (72ff.). A substantial contribution of new material and new insights.Google Scholar
Tommaso Diplovataccio (1468-1541), ‘Vita Accursii’ estratta dal De Claris Iurisconsultis (Pesaro Bibl. Oliveriana MS 203). A sample printing of pp. 81-95 of the edition of the medieval part of D.'s work which was begun by the late H. Kantorowicz and has now been completed by G. Rabotti. Distributed to the members of the Accursius Congress, Bologna, October 1963. Presentation page signed by G. Forchelli. (Cf. Bulletin for 1957, Trad. 13.509).Google Scholar
Dvornik, F., ‘The See of Constantinople in the First Latin Collections of Canon Law,’ Mélanges G. Ostrogorsky I (Belgrade 1963) 97–101.Google Scholar
Egger, C., ‘Le regole seguite dai canonici regolari nei secoli XI e XII,’ Vita comune II 9–12.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R., ‘Les Flores utriusque iuris de Jean de Hocsem et leur édition au xve siècle,’ TRG 31 (1963) 486–519. Establishes the identity of the anonymous Flores (Hain 12371: Cologne 1477) and the Flores of John of Hocsem discovered in 1886 by S. Bormans in the Maastricht Archives MS 215. Biography of J. of H. (1279-1348); his writings.Google Scholar
Feine, H. E., Kirchliche Rechtsgeschichte: Die katholische Kirche (4th ed. Köln-Graz 1964). xxiii, 788 pp. Considerably enlarged and revised since the last edition of this classic treatise appeared in 1955.Google Scholar
Foffano, V, ‘Descrizione paleografica del cod. M. 11 dell'Archivio della Basilica di S. Ambrogio di Milano: “Decretales de sacerdotio”,’ Vita comune II 48–65. Lists the canons of this collection (cf. Fournier-Le Bras II 222-4), to be dated c. 1130-39. Note on another collection in Bibl. Ambros. I. 145 inf. (p. 64f.).Google Scholar
Forchielli, ***., ‘Storia e dogmatica nello studio del Diritto canonico,’ Raccolta Jemolo I 1.583–614.Google Scholar
Fornasari, ***., ‘De consuetudine eiusque functione iuridica apud Patres,’ Apollinaris 35 (1962) 116–36. Patristic texts on definition, formation, prerequisites, and limits of custom. Appendix: comparison of rubrics for 19 cc. in Ivo and Gratian.Google Scholar
***, ‘Collectio canonum Barberiniana,’ Apollinaris 36 (1963) 127–41, 214-97. (also separately, Rome-Florence 1964; 108 pp.) Further details on the collection of Vat. Barb. lat. 538 (cf. this Bulletin for 1963, Trad. 19. 536-7); structure and sources (p. 132: the texts from Isidore are not the same as in Grat. D. 1), new texts; date (p. 137-8: begun between 1073 and 1080, completed 1081-1120), place (p. 138-40: Tuscany, possibly Lucca). Edition pp. 214ff.Google Scholar
***, ‘Tracce di un'antichissima redazione dei “Liber Pontificalis”,’ L'Osservatore Romano 29 April 1964, p. 5. Modena MS O.I.12 (considered a second redaction by Duchesne, who did not examine the MS directly): a canonical compilation s. vi, consisting of 50 canones apostolorum and notices of canonical interest excerpted from LP, down to Leo I. Additions s. vi/vii include Gesta de Xysti purg. and end with Gregory I. The model used by the compiler (who confuses Anastasius I and Anastasius II) thus would seem to have been a recension of the LP prior to Felix IV which did not go beyond Leo I.Google Scholar
Fransen, ***, ‘Les “Questiones” des canonistes (III),’ this Bulletin for 1963, Trad. 19.516–31.Google Scholar
Fries, ***., Forum in der Rechtssprache (Münchener theologische Studien, III: Kanon, Abt. 17; München 1963). xxiii, 242 pp. A historical and doctrinal study of the connotations of forum, in particular of the dichotomy forum internum — externum. For medieval doctrines see esp. pp. 99ff.; 122ff.; 149ff. Medieval authors listed, including some MSS, pp. xiv-xvi.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, ***., ‘Die Fälschungen im Mittelalter: Überlegungen zum mittelalterlichen Wahrheitsbegriff,’ Historische Zeitschrift 197 (1963) 529–554, followed by discussion, 555-601 (the paper was read in the Versammling deutscher Historiker, Duisburg, Oct. 1962).Google Scholar
Funck, S. V D., ‘Klerikale Frauen?’ OAKR 14 (1963) 271–90. Includes discussion of antiquity and Middle Ages.Google Scholar
Ganzer, ***., Die Entwicklung des auswärtigen Kardinalats im hohen Mittelalter: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Kardinalkollegiums vom 11. bis 13. Jahrhundert (Bibliothek des Deutschen historischen Instituts in Rom 26; Tübingen 1963). xxxiv, 217 pp. Prosopographical part, pp. 13-17 (from Victor II to Innocent IV); development of canonical practice, pp. 173-204.Google Scholar
García y García, ***. O. F. M., ‘Los manuscritos jurídicos medievales de la Hispanic Society of America,’ REDC 18 (1963) 501–60 (also separately, New York 1964, 63 pp.). The collection includes a Spanish version of Nepos de Montealbano (p. 530), a fragment of Gratian with the gloss of Barth. Brixiensis (77 fols; p. 544), two MSS of Raymond of Peñafort (pp. 544-6); a copy of Sext and Clementines with extravagantes (pp. 546-8).Google Scholar
***, ‘Valor y proyección historica de la obra juridica de San Raimundo de Peñafort,’ ibid. 233–51.Google Scholar
Gransden, ***. (ed.), The Customary of the Benedictine Abbey of Eynsham in Oxfordshire (Corpus consuetudinum monasticarum 2; Siegburg 1963). 243 pp. Introduction and edition of the 13th-cent. consuetudines. Google Scholar
Hackett, J. H., ‘State of the Church; A Concept of the Medieval Canonists,’ The Jurist 23 (1963) 259–90. Discusses texts in Gratian, decretists, and decretalists concerning status generalis ecclesiae; legislative practice; reason of state.Google Scholar
Hageneder, O., ‘Das päpstliche Recht der Fürstenabsetzung: seine kanonistische Grundlegung (1150-1250),’ Archivum historiae pontificiae 1 (1963) 53–95. Discusses developments after 1150 and under Innocent III and their difference from the action of Gregory VII.Google Scholar
Hageneder, O., ‘Studien zur Dekretale “Vergentis” (X. V, 7, 10): Ein Beitrag zur Häretikergesetzgebung Innocenz’ III.’ ZRG Kan. Abt. 49 (1963) 138–73. Analyzes changes in papal policy and the formulation of penal sanctions against fautores, credentes, receptatores haereticorum from 1199 to Conc. IV Lat. and to the Decretals of Gregory IX.Google Scholar
Hallinger, K. O. S. B. et al. (edd.), Initia consuetudinis benedictinae: Consuetudines saeculi octavi et noni (Corpus consuetudinum monasticarum 1; Siegburg 1963). cxiii, 627 pp. The monumental new edition includes the critical texts of ordines from the period before the 9th-cent. reforms, letters from Montecassino, customaries from the age of reform, and the materials (ed. Semmler, J.) pertaining to the reform legislation of Aachen 816/17 and the rule of Benedict of Aniane. H.'s introduction has important pages (xxii ff.) on the concept of consuetudo. Google Scholar
Herde, P., ‘Marinus of Eboli “Super revocatoriis” und “De confirmationibus”: Zwei Abhandlungen des Vizekanzlers Innocenz' IV über das päpstliche Urkundenwesen,’ Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken 42/43 (1964) 119–264 (also separately, Tübingen 1964, 150 pp.). Critical edition preceded by studies on the biography of Marinus, the MSS, analysis of the two treatises, (120-95); index, 251-64.Google Scholar
Holtzmann, W.: see Peitz, .Google Scholar
‘Index titulorum authentici in novem collationes digesti’ (compiled by Kuttner, S.) Studi Senesi3 12 (1963) 191–9; reprinted with some corrections from Seminar 2 (1944) 82-9.Google Scholar
Indices Corporis iuris civilis iuxta vetustiores editiones cum criticis collatas, pars I; Index titulorum moderante H. Nicolini curavit Franca Sinatta d'Amico (IRMAe, Subsidia 1; Milan 1964). ix, 358 pp.Google Scholar
Ius Romanum medii aevi: see preceding entry; Wieacker.Google Scholar
Jacqueline, B., Papauté et épiscopat selon saint Bernard de Clairvaux (Saint-Lô 1963). 127 pp.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, H., ‘Zur Geschichte des aktionenrechtlichen Denkens,’ Juristenzeitung (1964) 482–9. Discusses inter al. medieval writing on actiones, esp. in the collections of libelli with commentaries; their importance for the central place of actions in the development of legal doctrines.Google Scholar
Kempf, F., ‘Kanonistik und kuriale Politik im 12. Jahrhundert,’ Archivum historiae pontificiae 1 (1963) 11–52. Examines the connection between the early schools and papal policies prior to Innocent III.Google Scholar
Kiefner, H., ‘Qui possidet dominus esse praesumitur; Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Eigentumsvermutung zugunsten des Besitzers seit Placentinus,’ ZRG Rom. Abt. 79 (1962) 239–306. Concludes that the doctrine of ‘qui possidet.’ is neither Roman nor Germanic but was created by Placentinus and the jurisprudence of the 12th cent.Google Scholar
Koudelka, W J., Koudelka, O. P., ‘Eine neue Quelle zur Generalsynode von Siena 1423-1424,’ ZKG 74 (1963) 244–64. Briefly analyzes a newly discovered diary and collection of acts by the notary Guillermo Agramunt, written upon instruction of the Aragonese ambassador, Guillermo Armengol (Archivo del Reino de Valencia, Sección Real cod. 673).Google Scholar
Krchňák, A., ‘Die kanonistischen Aufzeichnungen des Nikolaus von Kues im Cod. Cus. 220 als Mitschrift einer Vorlesung seines Paduaner Lehrers Prosdocimus de Comitibus,’ Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 2 (1962) 67–84. The MS contains marginal notes by Cusanus on bk. II of the Decretals, from his student days in Padua.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, C. J., Kuhlmann, O. P., ‘De evolutione muneris vicarii generalis,’ RDC 13 (1963) 227–47, 327-39 (cf. Bulletin for 1963).Google Scholar
Kuttner, ***., ‘Dat Galienus opes et sanctio Justiniana,’ Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Helmut A. Hatzfeld ed. Crisafulli, A. S. (Washington 1964) 237–46. Argues for probability of English origin, s. xii ex., of the familiar verses.Google Scholar
Kuttner, ***., ‘The Date of the Constitution “Saepe”, the Vatican Manuscripts, and the Roman Edition of the Clementines,’ Mélanges Eugène Tisserant IV (Studi e Testi 234; Vatican City 1964) 427–52. Examines the history and textual transmission (MSS and incunabula) of the Clementines in order to trace the origin of the gross misdating of c. Saepe in the official edition. [Listed from author's off-print; the 7 vols. of the Mélanges were received too late for inclusion of other articles in this year's bibliography.] Google Scholar
Kuttner, ***., Introduction to Ioannis Andreae in quinque Decretalium libros Novella commentaria (Venice 1581; reprinted Torino 1963, 5 vols. in 4): I pp. v–xiv.Google Scholar
Kuttner, ***., ‘Some Gratian Manuscripts with Early Glosses,’ this Bulletin for 1963, Trad. 19.532–6.Google Scholar
Kuttner, ***., ‘Brief Notes: A New Canonical Collection; Summa ad iniungendam penitentiam’ ibid. 536–8.Google Scholar
Largiadièr, ***., Die Papsturkunden des Staatsarchivs Zürich von Innozenz III. bis Martin V Ein Beitrag zum Censimentum Helveticum (Zurich 1963). xii, 318 pp. (not seen).Google Scholar
Le Bras, ***., ‘Miettes pour une nouvelle édition de l'Histoire des collections canoniques,’ RHD4 41 (1963) 635–7. Briefly discusses recent work on the Statuta ecclesiae antiqua (Munier, Coquin), Dionysius Exiguus (Peitz), Epitome hispana (Martínez-Diez).Google Scholar
Le Bras, ***., Institutions ecclésiastiques de la Chrétienté médiévale; Première partie, Livres II à IV (Histoire de l'Église depuis les origines à nos jours 12.2; Paris 1964): pp. 233–596, [1]-[11].Google Scholar
Le Bras, ***., ‘Note sur la vie commune des clercs dans les collections canoniques,’ Vita comune I 15–17.Google Scholar
Le Bras, ***., see also Artonne, .Google Scholar
Leclercq, ***., ‘L’“Exordium Cistercii” et la “Summa cartae caritatis” sont-ils de saint Bernard?’ Revue bénédictine 73 (1963) 88–99.Google Scholar
Legendre, ***., ‘Fragments du manuscrit Oxford, St. John's College 235,’ this Bulletin for 1963, Traditio 19.536.Google Scholar
Legendre, ***., La Pénétration du droit romain dans le droit canonique classique de Gratien à Innocent IV (1140-1254) (Thèse pour le doctorat, Paris 1957; publ. 1964). 144 pp. Discusses a wide range of problems: use and authority of Roman law in the early medieval Church (pp. 13ff.); classical doctrines of relationship (the idea of Empire, problem of clerical studies of Roman law, theory of sources, pp. 35ff.); sources, modes, and significance of borrowings (pp. 68ff.); stages of penetration esp. after 1190: the ‘doctores moderni’ (97ff.; 108ff.); mandated and delegated jurisdiction as an example (117ff.). Amply illustrated by fresh textual materials from the glossators of both laws.Google Scholar
Lewis, E., ‘King Above Law? “Quod principi placuit” in Bracton,’ Speculum 39 (1964) 240–69. Takes issue with some of the interpretations in Kantorowicz, E., The King's Two Bodies. Google Scholar
Lewis, E., ‘The “Positivism” of Marsiglio of Padua,’ Speculum 38 (1963) 541–82. Reexamining the teaching of M. on divine, natural, and human law and legislation, the closely argued study traces connections of M.'s concepts with various well established medieval traditions and rejects the classification of his comprehensive (though unorthodox) theory of authority as ‘voluntarist’ or ‘positivistic.’ Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. F., ‘The Genius of Concord in Gratian's Decree,’ Ephem. iur. can. 19 (1963) 105–51 (to be continued).Google Scholar
Maccarrone, M., ‘I papi del secolo XII e la vita comune e regolare del clero,' ro,’ Vita comune I 349–98. From Urban II to Celestine III. Discussion, pp. 399-411.Google Scholar
Machielsen, L., ‘L'origine anglo-saxonne de supplément canonique à l'Histoire ecclésiastique de Bède,’ Revue bénédictine 73 (1963) 33–47 Discusses the epistola de gradibus consanguinitatis intruded at the end of the Hist. eccl. in certain MSS, as well as in some penitentials. Text and apparatus, pp. 38-47; Egbert of York or Nothelm of Canterbury as possible authors.Google Scholar
Machielsen, L., ‘Les spurii de s. Grégoire le Grand en matière matrimoniale, dans les collections canoniques jusqu'au Décret de Gratien,’ Sacris erudiri 14 (1963) 251–70. Discusses the transmission of 14 spuria in canonical and penitential books (printed materials only) from Jonas of Orléans to Gratian.Google Scholar
Maffei, D., La ‘Lectura super Digesto veteri’ di Cino da Pistoia: Studio sui MSS Savigny 22 e Urb. lat. 172 (Quaderni di ‘Studi Senesi’ 10; Milan 1963). viii, 74 pp. Rediscovers Cynus' lost lectura in two MSS which have passed for a work of Bartolus among modern legal historians.Google Scholar
Marongiu, A., ‘La forma religiosa del matrimonio nel diritto bizantino, normanno e svevo,’ Raccolta Jemolo I 2.851–77.Google Scholar
Martínez Diez, G.: see Peitz, .Google Scholar
Matczak, S. A., ‘An Archiepiscopal Election in the Middle Ages: Jacob II Swinka of Gniezno,’ Polish Review 8 (1963) 21–55. The case (1283) illustrates the transformation of canonical forms of election in Poland.Google Scholar
Meyvaert, P, ‘Towards a History of the Textual Transmission of the Regula s. Benedicti,’ Scriptorium 17 (1963) 83–110. A critical study of Hanslik's edition.Google Scholar
Miccoli, G., ‘Pier Damiani e la vita comune del clero,’ Vita comune I 186–211. Discusses especially opusc. 27 and 24. (See also Maccarrone's observations in the discussion, pp. 212-19).Google Scholar
Michaud-Quantin, P., ‘Commentaires sur les deux premières décrétales du recueil de Grégoire IX au xiiie siècle,’ Die Metaphysik im Mittelalter: ihr Ursprung und ihre Bedeutung (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 2; Berlin 1963) 103–9.Google Scholar
Munier, C., ‘L’Ordo de celebrando concilio wisigothique: ses remaniements jusqu'au xe siècle,’ Revue des sciences religieuses 37 (1963) 250–71. Discusses the alterations in the Hispana gallica and Ps.-Isidore.Google Scholar
Munier, C.: see also Peitz, .Google Scholar
Nicolini, J.: see Indices Corporis iuris. Google Scholar
Nineham, R., ‘The So-called Anonymous of York,’ Journal of Ecclesiastical History 14 (1963) 31–45. Rejects N. Cantor's arguments (cf. this Bulletin for 1959, Trad. 15.500) for authorship of Gerard of York and reinforces G. William's attribution of the tracts to a Norman writer from Rouen. Criticizes some of E. Kantorowicz's interpretations in The King's Two Bodies and analyzes the motivation of the Anonymous in his attack on papal primacy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nörr, K. W, Kirche und Konzil bei Nicolaus de Tudeschis (Panormitanus) (Forschungen zur kirchlichen Rechtsgeschichte und zum kirchlichen Recht 4; Köln-Graz 1964). vi, 192 pp. A detailed analysis of Panormitanus' ecclesiological concepts reveals the key to his system in the dichotomy potestas—exercitium, which makes it possible for him to unify the two doctrines of papal plenitudo potestatis and representation of the Church in the Council.Google Scholar
Örsy, ***., ‘Sacred Ordinations in Gratian's Decretum: the Conferring of the Order of Episcopate and of the Order of Presbyterate,’ Heythrop Journal 3 (1962) 152–62.Google Scholar
Peitz, W M., Dionysius Exiguus-Studien (this Bulletin for 1961, Trad. 17.550)]: for important critical reviews of P's hypothesis and method see especially Holtzmann, W., Journal of Ecclesiastical History 14 (1963) 217–9; Martínez Diez, G.S.J., Miscelánea Comillas 39 (1963) 297-308; Munier, C., Sacris erudiri 14 (1963) 236-50; Schäferdick, K., ZKG 74 (1963) 353-68.Google Scholar
da Rosa Pereira, ***., ‘Manuscritos de Direito canónico existentes em Portugal (II),’ Arquivo histórico de Madeira 13 (1962-63; publ. 1964) 28–41. Describes 7 MSS of the Biblioteca Nacional, the Arquivo Nacional da Torre do Tombo, the Bibl. Pública e Arquivo Distrital of Braga. Addenda to the author's first list (cf. this Bulletin for 1961, Trad. 17.550).Google Scholar
***–, ‘Penitencial medievo,’ offprint from Lumen , June 1964, 10 pp. Two incomplete copies of the penitential in verses ‘Peniteas cito peccator’ in Lisbon, B. N. Alcob. 161 (136), 197 (249); other fragments.Google Scholar
Peuchemaurd, ***. O.P., ‘Mission canonique et prédication: Le prêtre ministre de la parole dans la quérelle entre Mendiants et Séculiers au xiiie siècle,’ Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 30 (1963) 122–44, 251-76. Discusses both canonistic and theological material.Google Scholar
Pinedo, ***., ‘Concordia canonum Cresconii,’ Ius canonicum 4 (1964) 35–64. A general discussion of the Concordia, accepting Peitz's theory on Dionysius Exiguus as author, and assigning an important place to the work in the history of canonical science.Google Scholar
***–, ‘Fragmentación, titulación y sistema en las primeras colecciones canónicas,’ offprint from Homenaje a D. Ramón Carande (Madrid 1963), 15 pp. Discusses characteristics of tituli (rubrics) in Dionysiana, Cresconius, Hispana.Google Scholar
***–, ‘Una glosa del ms. Ripoll 78,’ Anuario de historia de derecho español 31 (1961) 459–63. Discusses a further detail of the Ripoll MS (cf. this Bulletin for 1963, Trad. 19.549), taking for glosses what is the marginal supplement of an abbreviatio. Google Scholar
Pontal, ***., ‘Quelques remarques sur les statuts des synodes diocésains et provinciaux et leurs imbrications,’ Revue d'histoire de l'Église de France 48 (1962) 80–85. Gives examples, s. xiii and xiv, of the frequent lack of distinction between the two types of synods. — See also Artonne.Google Scholar
Post, G., ‘Status Regis,’ Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History, ed. Bowsky, W M., 1 (1964) 1–103. Discusses in three chapters (I) Status ides*** magistratus, L'état c'est moi, and Status regis: the ‘estate royal’; (II) Status regis, L'estat du roi, and the Statute of York; (III) The Roman law and the ‘inalienability’ clause in the English coronation oath, and the status regis. Google Scholar
Post, G., Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State 1100-1322 (Princeton 1964), xv, 633 pp. Collects in chs. 1-10 earlier studies and papers of the author, with some revisions, from Speculum 9, 18, 29 (1934, 1943, 1954); Traditio 1, 4, 9 (1943, 1946, 1953); Die Welt als Geschichte 21 (1961), Studies in Med. and Ren. Hist. 1 (see above). Ch. 11 ‘The Naturalness of Society and the State’ (pp. 494-561) was written for this volume; also added are an introduction (3-24), ‘Reflections’ (562-70), a substantial bibliography of MSS (571-5) printed sources (575-86), and secondary works (586-609); index (611-33).Google Scholar
Pozo, C., ‘La noción de herejía en el derecho canónico medieval,’ Estudios Eclesiásticos 35 (1960) 235–51 (not seen).Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, L., ‘A proposito della terminologia e della natura giuridica delle norme monastiche e canonicali nei secoli xi e xii,’ Vita comune II 1–8 (also publ. in Raccolta Jemolo I 2.1065-76).Google Scholar
Roberg, B., Die Union zwischen der griechischen und der lateinischen Kirche auf dem II. Konzil von Lyon (1274) (Bonner historische Forschungen 24; Bonn 1964), 277 pp. Covers the period from 1262 to the end of the union (1281/2). Appendix of documents from Osnabrück, Staatsarchiv Depos. 58d; Durham, Dean and Chapter Munim. Loc. 1 No. 60*, etc. The author plans a reconstruction of the conciliar text of the Lyonese constitutions.Google Scholar
Rodes, R. E. Jr., ‘The Canon Law as a Legal System—Function, Obligation, and Sanction,’ Natural Law Forum 9 (1964) 45–94. Analyzes medieval material, legislative and documentary, general and English; comments on the discrepancy between the pastoral-eschatological orientation of canon law and the social function of law in the usual sense.Google Scholar
Rousset, P., ‘La notion de Chrétienté aux xie et xiie siècles,’ Le Moyen Age 69 (1963) 191–203. Supplements the studies of Ladner, Kempf, , et al. on the use of the term christianitas. Google Scholar
Sawicki, J., Concilia Poloniae: źrodła i studia krytyczne, vol. 10: Synody diecesj*** wrocławskiej i ich statuty … (Les Synodes du diocèse de Wrocław et leurs statuts; volume basé sur des matériaux préparés avec concours de l'Abbe Alfred Sabisch) (Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków 1963), xvii, 754 pp., maps A comprehensive critical and historical discussion of twenty synods and episcopal statutes, c. 1256-1653, revising on many points earlier scholars and editors' work (pp. 1-324); critical edition of the texts (327-721) German ‘Zusammenfassung’ (722-46); indices.Google Scholar
Sayers, J., ‘The Judicial Activities of the General Chapters, I,’ Journal of Eccl Hist. 15 (1964) 18–32. Traces pertinent materials from the general chapters of Cistercians, Premonstratensians, Augustinian Canons, Carthusians Grandmont, Mendicants, s. xii-xiii.Google Scholar
Schierse, P., ‘Legislation on Sequestration in Roman Law and in the Decretals of Gregory IX,’ The Jurist 23 (1963) 291–313. On the use of the Roman device of sequestratio in decretal cases involving possession; quasi-sequestratio of persons in matrimonial trials.Google Scholar
Schoeck, R. J., ‘Canon Law in England on the Eve of the Reformation,’ Mediaeval Studies 25 (1963) 125–47. Valuable survey of the general aspects, with particular reference to St. Thomas More.Google Scholar
Semmler, J., ‘Die Beschlüsse des Aachener Konzils im Jahre 816,’ ZKG 74 (1963) 15–82. Reexamines the history of Carolingian monastic reform on the basis of the author's discovery of Louis the Pious' capitulare of 23 August 816 (cf. Deutsches Archiv 16 [1960] 309-88; ZKG 71 [1960] 43ff.); the text is now edited by J. S. in vol. 1 of Hallinger's Corpus consuetudinum monasticarum (see above).Google Scholar
Semmler, J.: see also Verhulst, and Semmler, .Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. M., C.S.B., ‘The Influence of Canon Law on the Property Rights of Married Women in England,’ Mediaeval Studies 25 (1963) 109–24. Traces the influence on common law concepts; its limitation, esp. in the law of inheritance.Google Scholar
Sinatti: see Indices Corporis iuris civilis. Google Scholar
de Sousa Costa, A. D., ‘Mestre Silvestre e Mestre Vicente, juristas da contenda entre D. Afonso e sus irmãs,’ Itinerarium 9 (1963) 249–311 (not seen).Google Scholar
Stenger, R. P. O.P., The Development of a Theology of the Episcopacy from the Decretum of Gratian to the Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas (Thesis, Catholic University; Washington D.C. 1963), ix, 211 typewritten pp. (also in microfilm). Canonists discussed, including MSS texts, pp. 1-110.Google Scholar
Sydow, J., ‘Gedanken über die Auctoritas in der Kanonistik des frühen 13. Jahrhunderts (bis 1234),’ Antike und Orient im Mittelalter: Vorträge der Kölner Mediävistentagungen 1956-1959 (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 1; Berlin 1962) 253–65. (not seen).Google Scholar
Sydow, J., ‘Kanonistische Fragen zur Geschichte des Spitals in Südwestdeutschland,’ Historisches Jahrbuch 93 (1964) 54–68. Discusses inter al. X 3.36.4, Clem. 3.11.2, commentaries, and Lapo da Castiglioncho's De hospitalitate. Google Scholar
Tierney, B., “‘The Prince is not bound by the Laws”: Accursius and the Origins of the Modern State,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 5 (1963) 378–400. Shows that Accursius did not give an absolutist interpretation to the Roman maxims. Main texts analyzed: glosses on Dig. 1.3.31; Cod. 6.23.3; 1.14.4 and 12; Inst. 1.2.6.Google Scholar
Turrado, A. O.S.A., ‘Doctrina catholica de suprema potestate iurisdictionis Romani pontificis et de potestate episcoporum,’ Augustinianum 3 (1963) 325–55.Google Scholar
Van Damme, J. B. O.C.R., ‘La constitution cistercienne de 1165,’ Analecta s. Ordinis Cisterc. 19 (1963) 51–107. Traces the textual history of the Carta caritatis and the bull Sacrosancta, with presentation of parallel texts and commentary (pp. 56-99); summary tabulation of the statutes.Google Scholar
Van Luijk, B. O.S.A., ‘Bullarium Eremitarum s. Augustini: periodus formationis 1187-1256,’ Augustiniana 13 (1963) 474–510 (to be continued).Google Scholar
Verhulst, A. E. and Semmler, J., ‘Les statuts d'Adalhard de Corbie de l'an 822,’ Le Moyen Age 68 (1962) 91–123, 233-269. Text and commentary.Google Scholar
Vetulani, A., ‘Collectio Cracoviensis: Z badań nad redakcją średniowiecznych, zbiorów przepisów prawnych,’ Studia źródłoznawcze 8(1963) 49–82. Analysis, 3 plates, concordances with Coll. Luc. Monac. Berol. II; French summary (pp. 80-82). Discusses the genesis of collections by bundles (liasses) of decretals, their accidental growth in the schools and ultimate connection with the Chancery.Google Scholar
Watanabe, M., The Political Ideas of Nicholas of Cusa, with Special Reference to his De Concordantia Catholica (Travaux d'Humanisme et Renaissance 58; Geneva 1963), 215 pp. Includes many observations on the canonists' importance for the conciliar movement, mostly from recent literature.Google Scholar
Weinzierl, K., ‘Eucharistie und Kirchenjahr im Dekret Gratians (Pars III),’ Gestalt und Vollzug: Festschrift für J Pascher (Munich 1963) 338–51 (not seen).Google Scholar
Wieacker, F., Allgemeine Zustände und Rechtszustände gegen Ende des weströmischen Reichs (IRMAe 1.2a; Milan 1963), 63 pp.Google Scholar
Wilks, M. J., ‘The Apostolicus and the Bishop of Rome, II,’ Journal of Theological Studies n. s. 14 (1963) 311–54. Continues the study (cf. this Bulletin for 1963, Trad. 19.552) on the growth of the papal monopoly of the apostolic title, as distinct from apostolic succession in the episcopate; polemics of the conciliar epoch.Google Scholar