¹ Cf. Leclercq, H., “Autun (Manuscrits)”, Dictionnaire d'Archéologie Chrétienne et de Liturgie I 1, 3212–13.Google Scholar

² The first to edit this text was Martène, E. His Thesaurus novus anecdotorum V (Paris, 1717) contains the Expositio on pp. 91–100. Migne copied this edition in volume 72, col. 83–98 of his Patrologia Latina. In this article all quotations are taken from my edition: Quasten, J., Expositio antiquae liturgiae Gallicanae Germano Parisiensi ascripta (Münster, 1934). Google Scholar

³ For a discussion of the question of authenticity: Koch, H., “Die BüŠzerentlassung in der alten abendländischen Kirche,” Theologische Quartalschrift 82 (1900) 555ff. Batiffol, P, “L'Expositio liturgiae gallicanae attribuée à St. Germain de Paris,” Études de liturgie et d'archéologie chrétienne (Paris 1919) 245–290. Gaudel, A., “Le problème de l'authenticité des lettres attribuées à St. Germain de Paris”, Revue des sciences religieuses 7 (1927) 299ff. Cabrol, F., “Les origines de la liturgie gallicane,” Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique 30 (1930) 949–962. Google Scholar

⁴ Expositio 10, 4–7 Google Scholar

⁵ Hefele, J. Leclercq, H., Histoire des conciles III, 1 (Paris 1909) 185.Google Scholar

⁶ Ibidem 171.Google Scholar

⁷ Ibidem 197.Google Scholar

⁸ Cf. Leclercq, H., “Saint-Germain-des-Prés”, Dictionnaire d'Archéologie Chrétienne et de Liturgie VI 1, 1102–1150. See the epitaph of St. Germanus on p. 1119.Google Scholar

⁹ Cf. Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum 7 (Hannover, 1919–1920) 337–428. ed. Krusch, .Google Scholar

¹⁰ Martène, E., De antiquis Ecclesiae ritibus (Bassano, ⁵ 1788) 98ff. Google Scholar

¹¹ Lebrun, P, Explication de la Messe II (1726) 240–41.Google Scholar

¹² Duchesne, L., Origines du culte chrétien (Paris, ⁵ 1925) 200.Google Scholar

¹³ Franz, A., Die Messe im deutschen Mittelalter (Freiburg im Breisgau, 1902) 340.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Compare the following examples: Google Scholar

¹⁵ Cf. Wilmart, A., “Germain de Paris (Lettres attribuées a Saint),” Dictionnaire d'Archéologie Chrétienne et de Liturgie VI 1, 1102. Thibaut, J. B., L'ancienne liturgie gallicane, son origine et sa formation en Provence (Paris, 1929) 23–75. Google Scholar

¹⁶ Expositio 10, 13–11, 6.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Expositio 11, 7–11: Silentium autem diaconus pro duobus rebus annunciat, scilicet ut tacens populus melius audiat verbum Dei et sileat cor nostrum ab omni cogitatione sordida, quo melius recipiatur verbum dei.—The formula used by the deacon was Silentium facite. Cf. Expositio 17: Spiritaliter iubemur silentium facere observantes ad ostium. The Missale mixtum (PL 85, 121, 126) has the same formula. Cf. Isidore of Seville, De officiis ecclesiasticis 1, 10, 3 (PL 83, 745): Ideo diaconus clara voce silentium admonet ut sive dum psallitur sive dum lectio pronuntiatur.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Expositio 11, 12–17: “Sacerdos ideo dat <verbum> populo, ut dum ille benedicit plebem dicens: ‘Dominus sit semper vobiscum’, ab omnibus benedicatur dicentibus: ‘Et cum spiritu tuo’: ut tanto magis ille dignus sit populum benedicere, quantum favente deo de ore totius populi recipit benedictionem.” +populo,+ut+dum+ille+benedicit+plebem+dicens:+‘Dominus+sit+semper+vobiscum’,+ab+omnibus+benedicatur+dicentibus:+‘Et+cum+spiritu+tuo’:+ut+tanto+magis+ille+dignus+sit+populum+benedicere,+quantum+favente+deo+de+ore+totius+populi+recipit+benedictionem.”>Google Scholar

¹⁹ Expositio 11, 18–12, 11.Google Scholar

²⁰ Cf. Engberding, H., “Zum formgeschichtlichen Verständnis des ἄγιος ὁ ϑ∊ὸς, ἄγιος ἰσχυρὸς ἄγιοἀϑάνατος—ἐλἑβσον ἡμᾶς,” Jahrbuch für Liturgiewissenschaft 10 (1930) 168–174.Google Scholar

²¹ Damascene, John, De Fide Orthodoxa III 10.Google Scholar

²² Brightman, F E., Liturgies Eastern and Western, Vol. I: Eastern Liturgies (Oxford, 1896) 531, 9–11.Google Scholar

²³ Mansi, , Conc. ampl. collectio VI 936 C. Google Scholar

²⁴ Evagrius, , Historia Ecclesiastica III 44 (PG 86, 2697 A, B).Google Scholar

²⁵ John of Ephesus, Historia Ecclesiastica II, 52; III 44.Google Scholar

²⁶ Cf. Moreau, F J., Les liturgies Eucharistiques. Notes sur leur origine et leur développement (Brussels, 1924) 120.Google Scholar

²⁷ Cf. Hanssens, J. M., Institutiones liturgicae de ritibus orientalibus III (Rome, 1932) 96–104.Google Scholar

²⁸ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 155.Google Scholar

²⁹ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 218.Google Scholar

³⁰ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 423.Google Scholar

³¹ Expositio 14, 21–26.Google Scholar

³² Cf. Thurston, H., Lent and Holy Week (London, 1904) 357 Google Scholar

³³ Cf. Martène, E., De antiquis ecclesiae ritibus (Bassano ⁵ 1788) 23.Google Scholar

³⁴ Cf. Baumstark, A., “Orientalisches in altspanischer Liturgie,” Oriens Christianus 32 (1935) 11–14.Google Scholar

³⁵ Monumenta Ecclesiae Liturgica VI col. 760.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ibidem col. 815. Google Scholar

³⁷ Ibidem col. 737 Google Scholar

³⁸ Ibidem col. 740. Google Scholar

³⁹ Ibidem col. 745. Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Ibidem col. 763, 814. Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibidem col. 756. Google Scholar

⁴² Ibidem col. 806. Google Scholar

⁴³ Brightman, F E., Liturgies Eastern and Western, Vol. I: Eastern Liturgies (Oxford, 1896) 369.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ PL 85, col. 230 and 613. Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Expositio 12, 12–15.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Brightman, F E., l.c. 77 Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 423.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Mansi, , Conc. ampl. coll. VIII 727 Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Duchesne, L., Origines du culte chrétien (Paris, ⁵ 1925) 203.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Peregrinatio Aetheriae 24, 5 (CSEL 39, 72 Geyer).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Expositio 13, 1–10.Google Scholar

⁵² Expositio 24, 23–29.Google Scholar

⁵³ Ildefonsus of Toledo, Liber de cognitione Baptismi 107 (PL 96, 156): clauditur autem diebus Quadragesimae, aperitur tempore Paschae. Quod Quadragesima obsignatur ostendit, excepto gravissimae necessitatis obventu, his diebus per totum fieri baptismum omnimode non licere. Clauditur autem fons signaculo annuli, aperitur vero benedictione sacerdotis et mysteriis sacramenti. Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Mansi, , Conc. ampl. coll. XII 97 Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Les homiliae cathedrales de Sévère d'Antioche, traduction syriaque de Jacques d'Édesse 88 (Patrologia Orientalis 23, 92 ed. Brière, M.).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibidem 69 (Patrologia Orientalis 8, 388 ed. Brière, M).Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Dimitriewskij, A., Beschreibung der liturgischen Handschriften in den Bibliotheken des orthodoxen Orients (Kiev, 1895) 186.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Expositio 13, 11–14, 3.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Cf. Rado, P, “Das älteste Schriftlesungs-system der altgallikanischen Liturgie,” Ephemerides Liturgicae 45 (1931) 9–25, 100–115.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ PL 72, 167, 171ff. Google Scholar

⁶¹ Historia Francorum 4, 16 (PL 71, 282). Miracula S. Mart. 1, 5 (PL 71, 918).Google Scholar

⁶² Cf. Brightman, F. E., Liturgies Eastern and Western. Vol. I: Eastern Liturgies (Oxford, 1896) 531, 5.Google Scholar

⁶³ Brightman, F E., l.c. 425.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Cf. Concilium Toletanum IV canon 17 Hefele-Leclercq, Histoire des Conciles III 1 (Paris, 1909) 270.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Cf. Gregory of Tours, In gloria martyrum 86 (PL 71, 781C); De virtutibus S. Martini 2, 29, 40 (PL 71, 954D, 963C).Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Expositio 14, 4–7: Hymnum autem trium puerorum, quod post lectiones canitur, in figura sanctorum veterum, qui sedentes in tenebris adventum domini exspectabant.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Expositio 14, 21–15, 17 Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Jerome, , Contra Vigilantium 7 (PL 23, 346).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Expositio 15, 18–16, 5: Homeliae autem sanctorum quae leguntur, pro sola praedicatione ponuntur, ut quicquid propheta, apostolus vel evangelium mandavit, hoc doctor vel pastor ecclesiae apertiore sermone populo praedicet, ita arte temperans, ut nec rusticitas sapientes offendat nec honesta loquacitas obscura rusticis fiat.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Expositio, 16, 6–13.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Expositio 16, 19–17, 1: postea deprecarent pro illis levitae, diceret sacerdos collectam post precem.Google Scholar

⁷² Constitutiones Apostolorum 8, 1–22. Cf. Brightman, F. E., l.c. 9–12. Quasten, J., Monumenta Eucharistica et Liturgia vetustissima (Bonn, 1935–37) 206–209. Google Scholar

⁷³ The common response to the petitions of the diaconal litany was Kyrie eleison. Cf. Baumstark, A., La structure des grandes unités liturgiques,” Irénikon 11, 3 (1934) 142. The same author, “Textes Liturgiques,” Irénikon 11, 4 (1934) 314 and Liturgie comparée (Chevetogne, 1940) 44.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ In the Apostolic Constitutions, it is the prayer Kύρι∊ παντοκράτορ. Cf. Brightman, F. E., 12, 10–13, 3. Quasten, J., Monumenta 209, 12–210, 19.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ PL 72, 227 Cf. the collecta post precem of Easter Sunday (PL 72, 277). Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Cf. Baumstark, A., Die Messe im Morgenland (Kempten, 1906) 12–16; 91–108. Hanssens, J. M., Institutiones liturgicae de ritibus orientalibus III 2 (Rome, 1932) 230–260. Pl. de Meester, , La divine liturgie de notre père S. Jean Chrysostome (Rome-Paris, ³1925) 44–46. Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Expositio 16, 14–17, 12.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ For the dismissal of the catechumens cf. Schwartz, E., Busstufen und Katechumenatsklassen (Schriften der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft in Strassburg, No. 7, Strasbourg, 1911) 49.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Constitutiones Apostolorum 8, 6, 14. Cf. Quasten, J., Monumenta 201.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Testamentum Domini Nostri Jesu Christi I 35 (83 Rahmani). Cf. I 22 (35 Rahmani): Dimittat catechumenos, postquam eos erudierit lectione, exhortationibusque propheticis et apostolicis per verba doctrinalia, ut cognoscant illum (i.e. Dominum), in quem confitentur. Doceat mysteria fideles, dimissis praecedenter catechumenis.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Didascalia arabica 38, 12 (132, 2–5 Funk).Google Scholar

⁸² Brightman, F. E., Liturgies Eastern and Western, vol. I: Eastern Liturgies (Oxford, 1896) 41. Cf. Hanssens, J. M., Institutiones liturgicae de ritibus orientalibus, III: De missa rituum orientalium 2 (Rome, 1932) 266–71. Google Scholar

⁸³ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 375.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 430.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Didache 9, 5 (23, 19–24 Klauser).Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Expositio 17, 13–18. Cf. Jungmann, J. A., “Praefatio und stiller Kanon”, Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 53 (1929) 66–94, 247–271.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Constitutiones Apostolorum 8, 11, 11. (Quasten, J., Monumenta 211.) Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Brightman, F E., l.c. 41.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Brightman, F E., l.c. 321.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Brightman, F E., l.c. 435.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Brightman, F E., l.c. 490 f. Google Scholar

⁹² Expositio 17, 19–18, 19.Google Scholar

⁹³ Cf. Baumstark, A., “Der Cherubhymnos und seine Parallelen. Eine Gattung frühchristlicher Messgesänge des Morgenlandes,” Gottesminne VI, 10–22. Fortescue, A., “Cheroubicon,” Dictionnaire d'Archéologie Chrétienne et de Liturgie III 1, 1281–1286. Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Brightman, F E., l.c. 377–79.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Expositio 20, 10–16.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ For the Diptychs cf. Cabrol, F, “Diptyques,” Dictionnaire d'Archéologie Chrétienne et de Liturgie IV 1, 1045–94. Bishop, E. in Conolly, R. H., The Liturgical Homilies of Narsai (Cambridge, 1909) 97–117 Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Constitutiones Apostolorum 8, 12, 40–51 (511–515 Funk).Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Cyril of Jerusalem, Catecheses Mystagogicae 5, 8–9 (102 Quasten).Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Chrysostom, John, Ad Philip. 3, 4 (PG 62, 204), In I Cor 41, 4–5 (PG 61, 361).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ For the importance of this new source see Devreesse, R., “Les Instructions Catéchétiques de Theodore de Mopsueste,” Revue des sciences religieuses 13 (1933) 425–36. Abramowski, R., “Neue Schriften Theodors von Mopsuestia,” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 33 (1934) 66–68. For an analysis of the Eucharistic Liturgy as described by Theodore see Rücker, A., Ritus Baptismi et Missae quem descripsit Theodorus Episcopus Mopsuestenus in Sermonibus Catecheticis (Münster, 1933). Lietzmann, H., Die Liturgie des Theodor von Mopsuestia (Sonderausgabe aus den Sitzungsberichten der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-Hist. Klasse, 23, Berlin, 1933.) Reine, F J., The Eucharistic Doctrine and Liturgy of the Mystagogical Catecheses of Theodore of Mopsuestia (The Catholic University of America Studies in Christian Antiquity, No. 2, Washington, 1942.) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰¹ Theodore describes the Liturgy of Mopsuestia which was a suffragan of the metropolitan see of Anazarbus, which was in turn a suffragan of Antioch. The Liturgy of Mopsuestia is therefore the Liturgy of Antioch, the mother church. Google Scholar

¹⁰² Cf. Mingana, A., Commentary of Theodore of Mopsuestia on the Lord's Prayer and on the Sacraments of Baptism and the Eucharist (Woodbrooke Studies 6, Cambridge, 1933) 94.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ For the Liturgy which Dionysius the Areopagite describes see Stiglmayr, J., “Eine syrische Liturgie als Vorlage des Pseudo-Areopagiten,” Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 33 (1909) 383–85.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita, De ecclesiastica hierarchia III 2 (295 Quasten): Πρὸς οἰς ὸ ϑ∊ῖος ὶ∊ρἀρχβς ∊ὐχὴν ὶ∊ράν τ∊λ∊ῖ καὶ τὴν ἀγὶαν ∊ἰρήνβν ἄπασι διαγγέλλ∊ι. Kαὶ ἀσπασαμἑνων ἀλλήλους άπάντων, ὁ μυστικὴ των ἰ∊ρῶν πτυχῶν ἀνάῤῤησις ἐπιτ∊λ∊ῖται. Kαὶ νυψαμένων τὰς χ∊ῖρας ὒδατι τοῦ ἰ∊ράρχου καὶ τῶν ἰ∊ρέων, ὁ μὲν ἱ∊ρἀρχβς ἐν μέσῳ τοῦ ϑ∊ὶου ϑυσιαστβρὶου καϑὶσταται. Cf. De ecclesiastica hierarchia III 3, 9 (307 Quasten): Tῶν δὲ ἰ∊ρῶν πτυχῶν ἡ μ∊τὰ τὴν ∊ἰρήνβν ἀνάῤῥβσις ἀνακβρὑττ∊ι τοὺς ὁσίως β∊βιωκότας, καὶ πρὸς ἐναρέτου ζωῆς τ∊λ∊ίωσιν ἀμ∊ταστάτως ἀφικομένους. Cf. Maximus Confessor, Scholia in libr de ecclesiastica hierarchia 3, 2 (PG 4, 136 D): Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Brightman, F E., l.c. 275–281.Google Scholar

^105a Cf. Andrieu, M. et Collomp, P, “Fragments sur papyrus de l'anaphore de Saint Marc,” Revue des sciences religieuses 8 (1928) 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^105b Cf. Quasten, J., Monumenta Eucharistica et Liturgica Vetustissima (Bonn 1935–37) 46.Google Scholar

^105c Cf. Brightman, F. E., l.c. 169f.Google Scholar

^105d Cf. Baumstark, A., “Eine ägyptische Mess- und Taufliturgie vermutlich des 6. Jahrhunderts,” Oriens Christianus 1 (1901) 21: Et illis et omnibus quorum nomina recitavimus et quorum non recitavimus. Cf. The Liturgy of St. Cyril: Renaudot, E., Liturgiarum orientalium collectio I (Paris, 1716) 141. Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Expositio 20, 20–21, 9 Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ Cf. Engberding, H., “Der Gruss des Priesters zu Beginn der ∊ὐχαριστία in östlichen Liturgien,” Jahrbuch für Liturgiewissenschaft 9 (1929) 138–143. Baumstark, A., “Textes Liturgiques,” Irénikon (1934) 320–322. Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Cf. Baumstark, A., “Rits et Fêtes Liturgiques,” Irénikon 11 (1934) 487 Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Cyril of Jerusalem, Catecheses Mystagogicae 5, 3–4. (98, 21–99, 15 Quasten.) Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ For the Gallican Epiklesis and its relation to the oriental types cf. Lietzmann, H., Messe und Herrenmahl (Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte 8, Bonn 1926) 93.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Mone, F, Lateinische und griechische Messen aus dem zweiten bis sechsten Jahrhundert (Frankfurt, 1894).Google Scholar

¹¹² Cf. the third of Mone's Masses p. 19: Caelum, terram, maria cum suis formis in generibus procreasti. Hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem beatissimae trinitatis condidisti, ut conlocatus in suavitate paradisi creatori serviens creaturis reliquis imperaret Google Scholar

sed culpa praevaricationis admissa homine proiecto de vita paradisi successit mors Tu autem clemens et conditor, condolens tuo homini praevaluisse culpam peccati, ut iacens potuisset erigi, ad illum inclinata potentia descendisti.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Cf. Constitutiones Apostolorum 8, 12, 4–27 (212–220 Quasten). For the sources of the Anaphora of the Constitutiones see Baumstark, A., “Das eucharistische Hochgebet und die Literatur des nachexilischen Judentums,” Theologie und Glaube 2 (1910) 353–370.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Brightman, F E., l.c. 321–323. Cf. Engberding, H., Das Eucharistische Hochgebet der Basileiosliturgie (Münster, 1931).Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Lietzmann, H., Messe und Herrenmahl (Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte No. 8, Bonn, 1926) 170.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ As an example, we may take the collectio post Sanctus of the Mass for Epiphany in the Missale Gothicum (PL 72, 243): Vere sanctus, vere benedictus, Dominus noster Jesus Christus Filius tuus, qui ad puerperii caelestis indicium, haec hodie contulit mundo suae miracula majestatis, ut adorandam magis ostenderet stellam; et transacto temporis intervallo, aquas in vino mutaret, suoque baptismate sanctificaret fluenta Jordanis, Jesus Christus Dominus noster. Qui pridie quam pateretur. Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ Constitutiones Apostolorum 8, 12, 28–34 (220 Quasten).Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 51.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Brightman, F E., l.c. 86.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Expositio 21, 9–22.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Expositio 21, 23–22, 1.Google Scholar

¹²² Mingana, A., Commentary of Theodore of Mopsuestia on the Lord's Prayer and on the Sacraments of Baptism and the Eucharist (Woodbrooke Studies 6, Cambridge, 1933) 105.Google Scholar

¹²³ Brightman, F E., l.c. 97–99.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Brightman, F E., l.c. 293–95.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 97–98.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Cf. Bousset, W, Apophthegmata (Tübingen, 1923).Google Scholar

¹²⁷ PL 73, 855–1024. Google Scholar

¹²⁸ PL 73/74. Google Scholar

¹²⁹ Expositio 22, 1–17 Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Brightman, F E., l.c. 61.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Brightman, F. E., l.c. 340.Google Scholar

¹³² Augustine, , Serm. fragm. 3 contra Pelagianos (PL 39, 1721), Epistula 179, 4 (CSEL 44, 3 p. 693, 5–14 Goldbacher). Cf. Roetzer, W, Des hl. Augustinus Schriften als liturgiegeschichtliche Quelle (Munich, 1930) 131 f. Google Scholar

¹³³ Expositio 23, 1–10.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ For the rite of communion in the Gallican church, see Browe, P., “Die Kommunion in der gallikanischen Kirche,” Theologische Quartalschrift 102 (1921) 22–54.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ Martène, E., De antiquis ecclesiae ritibus (Bassano ⁵ 1788) 100.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Duchesne, L., Origines du culte chrétien (Paris ⁵ 1925) 237 Google Scholar

¹³⁷ Constitutiones Apostolorum 8, 13, 12–13 (229 Quasten).Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Cf. Quasten, J., “Der älteste Zeuge fur die trinitarische Fassung der liturgischen katholische Theologie 58 (1934) 253–254.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Mingana, A., l.c. 110.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Cf. Peterson, E., EIΣ ΘEOΣ. Epigraphische, formgeschichtliche und religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen (Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testamentes, Neue Folge 24, Göttingen, 1926) 138. But Narsai was not the first who used the trinitarian form as the Catecheses of Theodore of Mopsuestia prove.Google Scholar