Michael Ruse introduces the debate over intelligent design creationism.

Phillip Johnson introduces the debate over intelligent design.

Michael Behe makes a case for intelligent design.

Orr argues that the latest attack on evolution is cleverly argued, biologically informed — and wrong. This is his review of Behe's book, Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution.

‘Just don't pull the knot tight before being certain that you have got hold of the right end.’ Wittgenstein.

Hugh Mellor examines both the fine-tuning argument and the suggestion that this is but one of many universes within a great ‘multiverse’.

Thinking Tools is a regular feature that introduces tips and pointers on thinking clearly and rigorously.

Kaye and Prisco draw our attention to one of the more obvious difficulties with all versions of the argument from design (including both the fine-tuning and intelligent design versions).

In a preceding article, Phillip E. Johnson notes that ‘famed atheist philosopher Antony Flew’ has announced that he has ‘converted to philosophical theism (though not to Christianity or any other specific religion, at least as yet), on the basis of scientific discoveries and related reasoning, which [have] convinced him that there is an intelligent designer of the natural universe’. Here, Flew sets out his position more clearly.

Dene Bebbbington explains, and criticises, the intelligent design creationism of William Dembski.

The British Government has finally banned fox hunting. Richard Ryder explains why he believes it was the right decision.

Thomas Riggins responds to Michael Levin's provocative piece on homosexuality (in Issue 10).

David Robjant also criticizes Levin's article from Think 10.

Mikel Burley also responds to Michael Levin's article, ‘Non-Euclidean Sex’(Think 10).