Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:06:32.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TAKING CREDIT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2019

Stewart Manley
Get access

Abstract

A team of two brothers enters a baking contest. Their cake wins the first-place prize of £500. Will they demand £500 each? Of course not. Winners must split the prize. We often ignore this when we claim credit for team accomplishments. We take more credit than we deserve. I apply this idea to baking competitions and academic production but it applies equally to other arenas with teams of varying sizes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 18 , Issue 52 , Summer 2019 , pp. 59 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1 I am not the first to propose that credit for authorship be divided. See, for example, Clement, T. Prabhakar, ‘Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles’, Science and Engineering Ethics 20(2) (2014): 345–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.