THE POSSIBILITY OF AN EVIL-GOD: A RESPONSE TO WARD
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2019
Abstract
In his fairly recent article in this journal, ‘The Evil-god Challenge – A Response’ (Think 40), Keith Ward attempts to nullify Stephen Law's evil-god challenge by presenting several arguments intended to demonstrate that an omniscient, omnipotent being cannot conceivably be evil. In this article, I critically respond to each of Ward's arguments to reach the conclusion that an omnipotent, omniscient being could indeed be evil. To achieve this, I claim that neither perfect empathy nor rationality entails benevolence, that the desire for suffering is not necessarily pathological, and that human desire for a good god does not entail that god is actually benevolent.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019
- 1
- Cited by