Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:33:03.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HOUDINI AMONG THE SPIRITS: A LESSON IN CRITICAL THINKING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2019

Get access

Abstract

In spite of the widespread recognition of critical thinking as an elementary aim of education, and an important tool for people to evaluate information and make reasonable decisions in their daily lives, to think critically is a difficult task. We are consciously and unconsciously biased, and our basic beliefs strongly influence the way we assess evidence, so our cognitive default condition seems to move us away from critical thinking. However, it is possible appropriately to exercise critical thinking to evaluate subjects to which we are emotionally attached, and the experience of the illusionist Harry Houdini investigating Spiritualism is a striking example of it. My objective here is to discuss how Houdini incorporated core elements of critical thinking, such as the ability to evaluate reasons, and the disposition to calibrate his beliefs accordingly, in his assessment of the claim that Spiritualist mediums could contact the spirits of dead people, as described in his book A Magician among the Spirits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Siegel, H., Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education (New York: Routledge, 1988), 23Google Scholar.

2 Bailin, S. and Battersby, M., Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2016), 271Google Scholar.

3 Bailin and Battersby, Reason in the Balance, 272.

4 Houdini, H., A Magician among the Spirits (Amsterdam: Fredonia Books, 2002Google Scholar; first published 1924), xiii.

5 Ibid. 165.

6 Ibid. 221–2.

7 See Baggini, J., and Fosl, P. S., The Philosopher's Toolkit (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), 42–4Google Scholar, and Foresman, G. A., Fosl, P. S., and Watson, J. C., The Critical Thinking Toolkit (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017), 298301Google Scholar.

8 Ibid. 151–2.

9 Ibid. 154.

10 Ibid. 138.

11 Ibid. 138.

12 Ibid. 270.