THE ETHICS OF OMISSION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2019
Abstract
In society, power and responsibility are often linked, supporting the idea that with great power comes great responsibility. I assert that this link between power and responsibility is a form of the Act–Omission Distinction, a principle in ethics that there is a morally relevant distinction between doing something and omitting to do something, e.g. a difference between killing someone and letting someone be killed. As such, using trolleys, elected spider-men, and real-life cases such as R v Stone & Dobinson, I contest this casual relationship between power and responsibility and argue the relationship to be correlative as both power and responsibility are often simultaneously caused by consent.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019
- 1
- Cited by