Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:56:58.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DOWNLOAD THIS ESSAY: A DEFENCE OF STEALING EBOOKS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2013

Get access

Extract

Philosophers write essays. Nowadays most of them are highly technical and argumentative. They have titles like ‘A Rejoinder to So and So’ or ‘A Critique of Such and Such’. This is somewhat understandable. Like others in my field, as a philosopher, my work is predicated on having interlocutors – all of whom, with a few exceptions, I have never met. This is the beauty of the written word combined with public libraries. Because of printing I can engage the ideas of others from a different time or place; because of libraries I am not excluded from the conversation because of social or economic class.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Recently (March 2012), 17 publishing companies filed an injunction which shut down a website called library.nu – the most efficient and well-stocked resource for stealable electronic books.

2 See §107–108 of the United States Copyright Act, which holds that ‘it is not an infringement of copyright for a library or archives, or any of its employees acting within the scope of their employment, to reproduce no more than one copy or phonorecord of a work.’ Since it is not a violation of copyright there are no royalties involved with photocopying a book that a library holds.