Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:32:55.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DISPOSITIONS OF CRITICAL THINKERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2018

Gerry Dunne
Get access

Abstract

Most theorists agree that the ability to think critically is distinct from the disposition to do so. Many of us may have the ability to be critical thinkers, but unless we are consistently and internally motivated to think and reason this way, these abilities are effectively redundant. Such dispositions are both intellectual character traits, and dispositions to behave in certain ways. As such, the first step to understanding critical thinking requires us to develop an operationalized taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions. To avoid explicating these dispositions in abstracto, this article draws upon a murder trial in order to demonstrate the central role dispositions play in critical thinking.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 17 , Issue 48 , Spring 2018 , pp. 67 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R., and Daniels, L. B., Conceptualizing Critical Thinking’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 31.3 (1999), 285–302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Ennis, R. H., ‘A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities’, in Baron, J. and Sternberg, R. (eds.) Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice (New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1987), 1–26 Google Scholar.

3 Ennis, R. H., Critical Thinking (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996), 17Google Scholar.

4 Ennis, R., ‘Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception’, in Davies, M. and Barnett, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 31–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 34.

5 Peirce, C. S., Collected Papers, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931), 58Google Scholar.

6 Rescher, N., Philosophical Dialectics: An Essay on Metaphilosophy (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2004), 3Google Scholar.

7 Ennis, ‘Critical Thinking’ 37.

8 Groopman, J., How Doctors Think (New York: Mariner Books, 2007), 24Google Scholar.

9 As evidenced by Wittgenstein and Putnam, both of whom were ridiculed for changing their views at the time.