Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T14:52:02.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Short Counter-argument to Belief in Progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2025

Ali Pirhayati*
Affiliation:
University of Qom, Iran
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In a short article, Saul Smilansky (THINK 60, 2022) provides an argument in favour of the belief in social progress. He considers the ‘probability of losing a child’ to be a pivotal element among various criteria to be assessed in order to evaluate human progress and as this probability has decreased considerably in the modern era, he believes humanity is today in a better situation than in previous generations. In this article, I criticize Smilansky's argument and try to show that his criterion of progress is superficial.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Note

1 I am grateful to Richard Velkley for helpful comments on drafts of this article.