Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:28:27.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SELF-INTEREST AND MORAL PHILOSOPHY: A REPLY TO SOME IMPLICATIONS OF JEROME MORAN'S ‘ARISTOTLE ON EUDAIMONIA (“HAPPINESS”)’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2019

Tim Miles
Get access

Abstract

Moran argues that the ancient Greek philosophers did not really do moral philosophy because they conflated self-regard with other-regard. I argue that on the contrary questions of what is in a person's own interest are moral questions and that self-interest should play a part in moral philosophy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 18 , Issue 52 , Summer 2019 , pp. 87 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Moran, Jerome, ‘Aristotle on Eudaimonia (“Happiness”)’, Think 17(48) (2018): 91–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 97.

2 Often wrongly attributed to W. H. Auden, who used it but did not claim it. It was used in a 1923 recording by comedian Vivian Foster – see The W. H. Auden Society website – but could be of earlier origin.

3 Moran, ‘Aristotle on Eudaimonia’, 97–8.

4 Kant, , Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, ch. 2 (The Moral Law, trans. Paton, H. J. (London: Hutchinson, 1948), 86)Google Scholar.

5 Ibid. 95 (Paton).