Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:17:48.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SCIENCE AND SUPERNATURALISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

Get access

Abstract

In the first section of this paper, I discuss a quantum mechanical account, which is endorsed by the MIT physicist, Alan Guth, of the origin of what Guth believes to have been an absolutely first universe. I argue that, though his explanation is unsound, there is no reason to think that it needs to be replaced by a supernaturalist one. In the second section, I argue that though Professor Steven Weinberg's tentative explanation of the apparent fine-tuning of the cosmological constant is unacceptable, we need not accept a supernaturalist account of the coming about of intelligent life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1 On page 76 of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, (3rd Edition, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1974) Hume says: ‘…we may define a cause to be an object followed by another and where all the objects similar to the first one are followed by objects similar to the second.’