Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:18:05.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NON-CONTRADICTION: OH YEAH AND SO WHAT?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2013

Get access

Extract

The logical Law of Non-contradiction – that a proposition cannot be both true and false – enjoys a special, perhaps uniquely privileged, status in philosophy. Most philosophers think that finding a contradiction – the assertion of both P and not-P – in one's reasoning is the best possible evidence that something has gone wrong, the ultimate refutation of a position. But why should this be so? What reason do we have to believe it?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Baggini, Julian & Fosl, Peter S., The Philosopher's Toolkit (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002), 36.Google Scholar

2 Sturgeon, Nicholas L., ‘What Difference Does it Make Whether Moral Realism is True?Southern Journal of Philosophy, 1986, vol. XXIV, Supplement, 115141CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 115.