Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:06:04.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dingelstedt's Celebration of the Tercentenary: Shakespeare's Histories as a Cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Robert K. Sarlos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This rather proud statement is by Gerhart Hauptmann; anyone I wishing to challenge the validity of the boast will be wise to consider first the number of professional Shakespeare performances in the German language as compared with those in English, to take account of the amount and quality of German Shakespeare scholarship, and to realize that Shakespeare had reached many peoples in Eastern and Northern Europe by way of German transmission. In addition, the citation well illustrates the spirit in which German intellectuals approach Shakespeare.

Type
Research Article
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , November 1964 , pp. 117 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Gerhart Hauptmann, quoted in Stahl, Ernst Leopold, Shakespeare und das deutsche Theater (Stuttgart, 1947), p. 5.Google Scholar

2 Athenaeum, August 26, 1854, p. 999.

3 Ibid.

4 Liebscher, Otto, Franz Dingelstedt. Seine dramaturgische Entwicklung und Tätigkeit bis 1857 und seine Biihnenleitung in München (Halle, 1907), p. 17.Google Scholar

5 Stahl, , op. cit., p. 365.Google Scholar

6 Liebscher, , op. cit., p. 22.Google Scholar

7 Roenneke, Rudolf, Franz Dingelstedts Wirksamkeit am Weimarer Hoftheater. Ein Beitrag zur Theatergeschicte des 19. Jahrhunderts (Grefswald, 1912), pp. 139–140.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., p. 140.

9 Dingelstedt, Franz von, Sämtliche Werke (Berlin, 1877), Vol. 12, p. 492.Google Scholar

10 Ibid.

11 Ibid., pp. 493–494.

12 This explanation was printed in the program for the presentation of the cycle at Weimar; quoted in Roenneke, , op. cit., p. 102.Google Scholar

13 Dingelstedt, , op. cit., Vol. 12, p. 482.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 472.

15 Ibid., p. 465; Eckhardt, Ludwig, “Shakespeares englische Historien auf der Weimarer Bühne,” Shakespeare Jahrbuch I (1865), p. 363Google Scholar, pointed to the steady rise between Richard II and Richard III, and asked “Wüide dagegen Richard II nach König Johann nicht abfallen?”—implying that superiority rather than inferiority led Dingelstedt to discard King John.

16 Dingelstedt, , op. cit., Vol. 12, p. 465.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., p. 468.

18 Ibid., Vol. 9, p. 43.

19 Ibid., p. 45.

20 Roenneke, , op. cit., p. 190.Google Scholar

21 Unless Dingelstedt's act and scene division is specified, references are to Craig, Hardin, ed. The Complete Works of Shakespeare (Chicago, 1951).Google Scholar

22 Quoted by Eckardt, , op. cit., p. 368.Google Scholar

23 Parts of II, 4; III, 6; and some lines from III, 5, are woven in.

24 Dingelstedt, , op. cit., Vol. 12, p. 171.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., pp. 171–172.

26 Bulthaupt, Heinrich, Dramaturgie des Schauspieles (Odenburg-Leipzig, 1897), p. 144.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., p. 148.

28 Deutsche Rundschau III (April, 1875), p. 150.

29 Dingelstedt, , op. cit., Vol. 12, p. 471.Google Scholar

30 Stahl, , op. cit., p. 412.Google Scholar

31 April 24, 1851, p. 1811; Juni 18, 1851, p. 2690.

32 Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung, April 19, 1853, p. 1729.

33 Augsburgeer Allgemeine Zeitung, Mai 27, 1853, p. 2338.

34 Stahr, Adolf, Kleine Schriften (Berlin, 1925), p. 211.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., p. 206.

36 May 21, 1864, p. 717.

37 Roenneke, , op. cit., p. 36Google Scholar, calls attention to the irregularity of theatrical criticism at Weimar.

38 Roenneke, , op. cit., p. 58.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., pp. 102–108.

40 Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung, April 25,1864, p. 1883.

41 Augusburger Allgemeine Zeitung, Mai 7, 1864, pp. 2081–2082.

42 Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung, Mai 8,1864, p. 2097. Yet the reviewer considered Dessoir's rendering of Falstaff and of Cade “jongleurartig.”

43 Ibid.

44 Ibid., p. 2098.

45 Ibid.

46 Ibid.

47 Weimarer Zeitung, No. 107,1864, as quoted by Roenneke, , op. cit., p. 116.Google Scholar

48 Roenneke, , op. cit., p. 198.Google Scholar

49 Ibid., p. 202.

50 Eckardt, , op. cit., p. 390.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., p. 381.

52 Stahr, , op. cit., p. 213.Google Scholar

53 Ibid.

54 Ibid., p. 229.

55 Ibid., p. 231.

56 Ibid., p. 227.

57 Laube, Heinrich, Das Burgtheater (Leipzig, 1868), p. 202.Google Scholar