Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:49:54.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounting for the Audience in Historical Reconstruction: Martin Jones's Production of Langston Hughes's Mulatto

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2009

Jay Plum
Jay Plum
Affiliation:
Jay Plum is a doctoral student in the Ph.D. Program in Theatre at the CUNY Graduate School, and University Center.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although Langston Hughes's Mulatto holds the record as the second longest Broadway production of a play by an African American playwright (surpassed only by Lorraine Hansberry's A Raisin in the Sun), the reasons behind its commercial success have been virtually ignored. This oversight in part reflects a tendency among theatre scholars to treat the dramatic text as the primary (if not the only) source of a play's meaning. In the case of Mulatto, academic critics have debated its literary merit according to questions of form and genre. Webster Smalley, in his introduction to the collected plays of Langston Hughes, for instance, defends Mulatto as a tragedy, arguing that the play avoids the tendency of social dramas of the 1930s “to oversimplify moral issues as in melodrama” because of the recognition of Bert's “tragic situation” (he must kill himself or be killed by an angry lynch mob). For those critics who insist that Mulatto is melodramatic, Smalley advises, “let [them] look to the racial situation in the deep South as it is even today [i.e., 1963]: it is melodramatic.” Smalley presupposes a dichotomous relationship between fiction and reality, advancing a mimetic theory in which representation directly corresponds to the real. Rather than answering specific charges, he defines contemporary race relations as melodrama, implying that Mulatto, even if melodramatic, is “natural” and “accurate.”

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Survey , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , May 1995 , pp. 5 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ENDNOTES

1 Smalley, Webster, Introduction to Five Plays, by Langston Hughes (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1963), xi.Google Scholar

2 Ibid.

3 Davis, Arthur P., From the Dark Tower: Afro-American Writers, 1900–1960 (Washington, DC: Howard University Press, 1974), 68.Google Scholar

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid.

6 Turner, Darwin T., “Langston Hughes as Playwright,” in The Theatre of Black Americans, vol. 1, ed. Hill, Errol (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980), 136.Google Scholar

7 Barksdale, Richard K., “Miscegenation on Broadway: Hughes's Mulatto and Edward Sheldon's The Nigger,” in Critical Essays on Langston Hughes, ed. Mullen, Edward J. (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1986), 199.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., 196.

9 Appiah, Anthony, “Strictures on Structures: The Prospects of Structuralist Poetics of African Fiction,” in Black Literature and Literary Theory, ed. Gates, Henry Louis Jr (New York: Methuen, 1984), 146.Google Scholar

10 Davis, Tracy C., “Annie Oakley and Her Ideal Husband of No Importance,” in Critical Theory and Performance, ed. Reinelt, Janelle G. and Roach, Joseph R. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992), 299.Google Scholar

11 Bienvenu, Germain J., “Intracaste Prejudice in Langston Hughes's Mulatto,” African American Review 26 (Summer 1992): 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Emphasis in original.

12 Ibid.

13 For an overview of the historiographical problems encountered in studying African American theatre, see Hatch, James V., “Here Comes Everybody: Scholarship and Black Theatre History,” in Interpreting the Theatrical Past: Essays in the Historiography of Performance, ed. Postlewait, Thomas and McConachie, Bruce A. (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1989), 148–165.Google Scholar

14 Mitchell, Loften, Black Drama: The Story of the American Negro in the Theatre (New York: Hawthorn Books, 1967), 97.Google Scholar

15 Abramson, Doris E., Negro Playwrights in the American Theatre, 1925–1959 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), 2.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., 71.

17 Ibid., 79.

18 Bennett, Tony, “Text, Readers, Reading Formations,” Literature and History 9 (Autumn 1983): 214Google Scholar, quoted in Carlson, Marvin, Theatre Semiotics: Signs of Life (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 14.Google Scholar

19 “Summer Theatres,” Variety, 14 08 1935, 48.Google Scholar

20 Rumsey, John W., Letter to Hughes, Langston, 9 08 1935Google Scholar, American Play Company Papers, Berg Collection, New York Public Library.

21 Hughes, Langston, “Father and Son,” in The Ways of White Folks (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1934Google Scholar; reprint, New York: Vintage Books, 1990), 207 and 250 (page references to reprint edition).

22 For a more detailed discussion of “Father and Son,” see Berzon, Judith R., Neither White Nor Black: The Mulatto Character in American fiction (New York: New York University Press, 1978), 83–85.Google Scholar

23 Rampersad, Arnold, The Life of Langston Hughes, vol. 1, 1902–1941: I, Too, Sing America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 315.Google Scholar

24 Hughes, Langston, Letter to Rumsey, John W., 13 08 1935Google Scholar, American Play Company Papers.

25 Jones was a theatrical hobbyist whose only qualification as a producer was his inherited wealth. After White Cargo and Mulatto, he never produced or directed another production.

26 Rumsey informed Jones of Hughes's intentions in a typed letter signed 15 August 1935, a copy of which is preserved in the American Play Company Papers. In this letter, Rumsey quotes verbatim Hughes's lengthy discussion of possible revisions.

27 Hughes, Langston, I Wonder as I Wander: An Autobiographical Journey (New York: Hill and Wang, 1956), 311.Google Scholar

28 Hughes in fact conceived the role of Cora Lewis for McClendon when both were in residence at the Jasper Deeter's Hedgerow Theatre in 1930. See Hughes, , I Wonder as I Wander, 311.Google Scholar

29 Bond, Frederick G., The Negro and the Drama (Washington, DC: The Associated Publishers, 1940), 116.Google Scholar

30 Hughes, , I Wonder as I Wander, 311.Google Scholar

31 Ibid.

32 Fiske, John and Hartley, John, Reading Television (London: Methuen, 1978), 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted in Sinfield, Alan, “Power and Ideology: An Outline Theory and Sidney's Arcadia,” ELH 52 (Summer 1985): 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Carlson, , 101.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., 18.

35 Jauss, Hans Robert, Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, trans. Bahti, Timothy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), 22–23Google Scholar, quoted in Carlson, , 11–12.Google Scholar

36 Hughes agreed to these conditions as early as 13 August 1935. See his previously cited letter to Rumsey of that date.

37 “Mulatto is Well Received by Local Critics,” Amsterdam News, 2 11 1935, 12Google Scholar; Atkinson, Brooks, “The Play,” New York Times, 25 10 1935, 18.Google Scholar

38 Garland, Robert, “Mulatto Presented at Vanderbilt,” New York World-Telegram, 25 10 1935, 30.Google Scholar

39 Lockridge, Richard, “The New Play,” New York Sun, 25 10 1935, 34.Google Scholar

40 Allen, Kelcey, “Amusements,” Women's Wear Daily, 25 10 1935, 13.Google Scholar

41 Hammond, Percy, “The Theatres,” New York Herald-Tribune, 25 10 1935, 14.Google Scholar

42 Gabriel, Gilbert W., “Mulatto,” New York American, 25 10 1935, 11.Google Scholar

43 See Turner, Darwin T., “W. E. B. Du Bois and the Theory of a Black Aesthetic,” in The Harlem Renaissance Re-examined, ed. Kramer, Victor A. (New York: AMS Press, 1986), 26.Google Scholar

44 Waldorf, Wilella, “Mulatto Brings Up the Race Problem Once More,” New York Evening Post, 25 10 1935, 10.Google Scholar

45 Lockridge.

46 Atkinson.

47 Gentry, James J., “Mulatto Tailor-Made for White Audiences”Google Scholar [citation incomplete], Vertical file, Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, New York.

48 “To Drop Mulatto Suit,” New York Times, 13 01 1936Google Scholar, Clippings file, Billy Rose Theatre Collection, New York Public Library.

49 Mantle, Burns, “The Drama,” New York Daily News, 3 11 1935, 90.Google Scholar

50 Scruggs, Otey M., “The Economic and Racial Components of Jim Crow,” in Key Issues in the Afro-American Experience, vol. 2, ed. Huggins, Nathan I., Kilson, Martin, and Fox, Daniel M. (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971), 86.Google Scholar

51 “The Complete Report of Mayor LaGuardia's Commission on the Harlem Riot of March 19, 1935,” in Mass Violence in America, ed. Fogelson, Robert M. and Rubenstein, Richard E. (New York: Arno Press and the New York Times, 1969), 18Google Scholar. For more on the social, political, and economic conditions preceding and following the riot, see Greenberg, Cheryl Lynn, “Or Does It Explode?”: Black Harlem in the Great Depression (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

52 Sitkoff, Harvard, A New Deal for Blacks: The Emergence of Civil Rights as a National Issue, vol. 1: The Depression Decade (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), 55Google Scholar. Roosevelt in fact never managed to balance the demand for racial equality with the realities of implementing social reform. In 1935, for example, he sacrificed promising antilynching legislation in order to save his relief programs from congressional committees controlled by Southern politicians. See Lewis, David Levering, When Harlem Was in Vogue (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1981; reprint, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 284.Google Scholar

53 Sitkoff, , 105.Google Scholar

54 Williamson, Joel, New People: Miscegenation and Mulattoes in the United States (New York: New York University Press, 1984), 114.Google Scholar

55 Gates, Henry Louis Jr., “Introduction: Writing ‘Race’ and the Difference It Makes,” in “Race,” Writing, and Difference, ed. Gates, Henry Louis Jr. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), 5.Google Scholar

56 “Insult, Sah!” New York Post, 19 11 1935, 8.Google Scholar

57 Hughes, , I Wonder as I Wander, 313.Google Scholar

58 Bormann, Ernest G., “Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 58 (1972): 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 Hughes, , I Wonder as I Wander, 313.Google Scholar

60 Gentry.

61 Gaines, Jane, “White Privilege and Looking Relations: Race and Gender in Feminist Film Theory,” Screen 29 (Autumn 1988): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 See Carby, Hazel V., “‘On the Threshold of a Woman's Era’: Lynching, Empire, and Sexuality in Black Feminist Theory,” in “Race,” Writing, and Difference, 301–316Google Scholar. For an historical overview of mythologies about African American women, see White, Deborah Gray, “Ar'n't I a Woman?”: Female Slaves in the Plantation South (New York: W. W. Norton, 1985).Google Scholar

53 Roach, Joseph R., “Slave Spectacles and Tragic Octoroons: A Cultural Genealogy of Antebellum Performance,” Theatre Survey 33 (11 1992): 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64 Advertisement in Program for Brown Sugar, Majestic Theatre, Brooklyn, NY Clippings file, Billy Rose Theatre Collection.

65 “Clerics to Review Mulatto After Philly Mayor Bans the Play,” Variety, 10 February 1937, Clippings file, Billy Rose Theatre Collection.

66 Patton, Bernice, “Hollywood Weeps at Mulatto,” Pittsburgh Courier, 28 11 1936Google Scholar, Vertical file, Schomburg Center.

67 Calvin, Floyd J., “Calls Play 2nd Tobacco Road,” New York Age, 29 02 1936Google Scholar, Vertical file, Schomberg Center.

68 Sinfield, , 275.Google Scholar