Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:20:22.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Notes on Noh Dancing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2009

George W. Brandt
Affiliation:
The Director of Film Studies, Drama Department, University of Bristol, England.
Kuniyoshi Munakata
Affiliation:
Professor of English, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Shizuoka University, Japan.

Extract

When a company of Japanese actors under the leadership of Manzaburo UMEWAKA* presented some noh plays at the Aldwych Theatre in 1967 as part of the World Theatre Season, a good many British critics confessed themselves to be more than a little baffled. Opinions ranged from one reviewer's: ‘Noh is stylised to the point of static incomprehensibility’ to Philip Hope-Wallace's guarded appreciation: ‘The sound which prevails is curious; wailing and hooting noises like owls with indigestion. But the combination of strange noises and slow, potent, intense movement adds up to some very exotic and memorable poetry; to those (so to speak) in the know, it must be a lifetime's experience.’ To Irving Wardle the cultural barrier was impenetrable. ‘I found the performance totally alien: a blank cheque with no doubt centuries of artistic credit behind it, but which might equally almost have been staged as a hoax on the cultural community… I doubt whether any such vision can be transmitted without a shared language…’ Even critics anxious to enter into the spirit of this, to them, wholly new experience admitted that they found it hard going. W. A. Darlington wrote, ‘The plays were performed by a company trained from childhood to a stylised form of art of which one cannot hope, without study, to appreciate the finer points.’

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. A Guide to Nō (Tokyo and Kyoto: Hinoki Shoten 1953), p. 1.

2. Pound, Ezra and Fenollosa, Ernest, The Classic Noh Theatre of Japan (New York: New Directions 1959Google Scholar; first published 1917), p. 69.

3. ibid., p. 4.

4. The Nō Plays of Japan (London and New York 1922).

5. (Tokyo: Kodansha Publishers Ltd. 1966), pp. 79–81; illustrations on pp. 90–112, 117–21, 127–31, 136–45, 219–22, 232–75.

6. (New York and Tokyo: Walker/Weatherhill 1971).

7. (Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle Co. 1969), esp. pp. 39–60.

8. Ze-ami, , Kadensho, translated by Nobori, ASAJI (Osaka: Union Services Co. 1975), p. 83.Google Scholar

9. ibid., p. 99.

10. ibid., p. 97.

11. Zen Buddhism/Selected Writings of D. T. Suzuki, ed. by Barrett, William (New York: Doubleday Anchor Books 1956), p. 95.Google Scholar

12. Noh/The Classical Theater, pp. 230–1.

13. See Keene, , Nō/The Classical Theatre of Japan, p. 150Google Scholar for an illustration of this.

14. Kadensho, p. 49.

15. According to a recent statistic, present-day noh performers belong to the five schools in the following proportions: Kanze 63%; Hōshō 16%; Komparu 8%; Kongō 8%; Kita 5%.