No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2009
Censorship of the stage, like censorship of the printed word, was widespread and well-established in Europe in 1815. However, while prior censorship of the press was eliminated throughout Europe by 1914, European countries almost universally retained prior censorship of the stage until (and sometimes well after) World War I. England became the first major European country to abolish censorship of the press in 1695, yet Parliament systematized a formerly haphazard theatre censorship in 1737, and did not end stage censorship until 1968. Most other European countries did not eliminate press censorship until about the middle of the nineteenth century, while maintaining theatre censorship throughout the century, and typically exercised much harsher controls over the stage than over the printed word. As John Allen has noted, ‘In many times and places the drama has been subject to far greater censorship than any other form of literature or art’, reflecting governmental feelings that ‘the theatre, with its power of affecting an audience with possibly subversive emotions and ideas, is more to be feared’.
1. On European press controls during the nineteenth century, see Goldstein, Robert J., ‘Freedom of the Press in Europe, 1815–1914’, Journalism Monographs, 80 (1983).Google Scholar
2. A History of the Theatre in Europe (London, 1983), pp. 256–7.Google Scholar
3. Pascal, Roy, From Naturalism to Expressionism: German Literature and Society, 1880–1918 (New York, 1973), p. 266.Google Scholar
4. Macgowan, Kenneth, Melnitz, William and Armstrong, Gordon, Golden Ages of the Theater (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1979), pp. 87, 164, 239.Google Scholar
5. Artz, Frederick, Reaction and Revolution, 1814–1832 (New York, 1963), pp. 273–4.Google Scholar
6. Weiner, Jack, Mantillas in Moscovy: The Spanish Golden Age Theater in Tsarist Russia, 1672–1917 (Lawrence, Kansas, 1970), p. 25.Google Scholar
7. As quoted in Findlater, Richard, Banned! A Review of Theatrical Censorship in Britain (London, 1967), p. 16.Google Scholar
8. Conolly, L. W., The Censorship of English Drama, 1737–1824 (San Marino, California, 1976), p. 180.Google Scholar
9. Claus, Horst, The Theatre Director Otto Brahm (Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1981), p. 71.Google Scholar
10. Hemmings, F. W. J., Culture and Society m France, 1848–1898: Dissidents and Philistines (London, 1971). P.51.Google Scholar
11. Roberts, Vera, On Stage: A History of Theatre (New York, 1962), p. 411.Google Scholar
12. Claus, , p. 47Google Scholar; Stark, Gary, ‘Cinema, Society and the State: Policing the Film Industry in Imperial Germany’, in Essays on Culture and Society in Modern Germany, ed. Stark, Gary D. and Lackner, Bede (College Station, Texas, 1982), p. 143.Google Scholar
13. Stephens, John R., The Censorship of English Drama, 1824–1901 (Cambridge, England, 1980), p.42.Google Scholar
14. John, and Lough, Muriel, An Introduction to Nineteenth Century France (London, 1978), p. 273Google Scholar; Carlson, Marvin, The French Stage in the Nineteenth Century (Metuchen, N.J., 1972), p. 67.Google Scholar
15. Hemmings, , p. 51Google Scholar; Stephens, , p. 43.Google Scholar
16. Carter, Lawson, Zola and the Theater (New Haven, Connecticut, 1963), p. 137.Google Scholar
17. Slonim, Marc, Russian Theater From the Empire to the Soviets (Cleveland, 1961), p. 145.Google Scholar
18. Stephens, , p. 127.Google Scholar
19. Sagarra, Eda, Tradition and Revolution: German Literature and Society, 1830–1890 (NewYork, 1971), p. 96.Google Scholar
20. Marshall, Herbert, The Pictorial History of the Russian Theatre (NewYork, 1976), p. 247.Google Scholar
21. Sagarra, , p. 79.Google Scholar
22. Kippur, Stephen A., Jules Michelet (Albany, New York, 1981), pp. 120, 130.Google Scholar
23. Claus, , p. 43.Google Scholar
24. Leyda, Jay, Kino: A History of the Russian and Soviet Film (Princeton, N.J., 1983), pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
25. See the discussion in Conolly, , pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
26. Goldstein, , pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
27. See generally Goldstein, Robert J., Political Repression in Nineteenth Century Europe (London, 1983).Google Scholar
28. Findlater, , p. 41.Google Scholar
29. Allen, , p. 228.Google Scholar
30. Lough, John, Writer and Public in France: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day (Oxford, 1978), P. 339.Google Scholar
31. Macgowan, , p. 190.Google Scholar
32. Carlson, Marvin, The Italian Stage from Guidoni to D'Annunzio (London, 1981), pp. 103, 130.Google Scholar
33. Hewitt, Bernard, History of the Theatre from 1800 to the Present (New York, 1970), p. 6.Google Scholar
34. Brown, Frederick, Theater and Revolution (New York, 1980) p. 39Google Scholar; Conolly, , p. 2Google Scholar; Hunnings, Neville, Film Censors and the Law (London, 1967), p. 316Google Scholar; Patterson, Michael, The Revolution in German Theatre, 1900–1933 (Boston, 1981), p. 28.Google Scholar Good general discussions on the theatre censorship are available for England in the previously cited books by Findlater, Conolly and Stephens; for France in the previously cited books by Hemmings and Lough (see note 65 below for pagination); for Denmark in the book cited in this note by Hunnings, , pp. 307–16Google Scholar; and for Germany in the previously cited book by Pascal, , pp. 262–76.Google Scholar A good deal of useful, although scattered, information can be obtained for Italy in Carlson, Marvin, The Italian StageGoogle Scholar and for Russia in Weiner, previously cited, and in Burgess, M. A. S., ‘The Early Russian Theatre’, in Companion to Russian Studies, vol. 2, eds Auty, R. and Obsolensky, D. (Cambridge, England, 1977).Google Scholar
35. Claus, , p. 46.Google Scholar
36. Pascal, , p. 264.Google Scholar
37. Carlson, , The Italian Stage, p. 55.Google Scholar
38. Driver, Tom, A History of the Modern Theatre (New York, 1970), p. 201.Google Scholar
39. Ibid.
40. See Goldstein, , Political Repression.Google Scholar
41. Berthold, Margot, A History of World Theater (New York, 1972), p.537.Google Scholar
42. Findlater, , p. 53.Google Scholar
43. Varneke, B. V., History of the Russsian Theatre (New York, 1971), p. 237.Google Scholar
44. Carlson, , The Italian Stage, p. 101.Google Scholar
45. Kimbell, Donald, Verdi in the Age of Italian Romanticism (Cambridge, England, 1981), p.25.Google Scholar
46. Carlson, , The Italian Stage, p. 119.Google Scholar
47. Findlater, , p. 66.Google Scholar
48. Hemmings, , pp. 48–9.Google Scholar
49. Stephens, , p. 10.Google Scholar
50. Jelavich, Peter, Munich and Theatrical Modernism: Politics, Playwriting and Performance, 1890–1914 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1985), p. 121.Google Scholar
51. Findlater, , p. 54.Google Scholar
52. Stephens, , pp. 168–9.Google Scholar
53. Yates, W. E., Grillparzer (Cambridge, England, 1972), p. 12.Google Scholar
54. Claus, , p. 47.Google Scholar
55. Hemmings, , pp. 46–7.Google Scholar
56. Stephens, , p. 80Google Scholar: Findlater, , p. 55.Google Scholar
57. Findlater, , p. 58.Google Scholar
58. Ibid., p. 74.
59. Ibid, p. 75.
60. Lawrence, E. P., ‘The Banned Mikado: A Topsy-Turvey Incident’, Centennial Review, 18 (1974), pp. 151–69.Google Scholar
61. Quoted in Saylor, Oliver, Inside the Moscow Art Theatre (Greenwood, Connecticut, 1970), p. 215.Google Scholar
62. Hingley, Ronald, Russian Writers and Society, 1825–1904 (New York, 1967), p. 229.Google Scholar
63. Monas, Sidney, The Third Section: Police and Society in Russia under Nicholas I (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1961), p. 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Varneke, , pp. 203–7, 220–22Google Scholar; Slonim, , p. 45Google Scholar; Freedley, George and Reeves, John, A History of the Theatre (New York, 1941), p. 396.Google Scholar
64. Weiner, , p. 58.Google Scholar
65. Hemmings, , pp. 43–51Google Scholar; Lough, , Writer and Public, pp. 41–2, 62–3, 75, 173–4, 287–8, 338–43.Google Scholar
66. Slonim, , p. 84.Google Scholar
67. Allen, , p. 222Google Scholar; Findlater, , p. 47Google Scholar; Cleaver, James, The Theatre Through the Ages (London, 1948), p 103.Google Scholar
68. Findlater, , p. 47Google Scholar; Brockett, Oscar, History of the Theatre (Boston, 1977) p. 25.Google Scholar
69. Roberts, , p. 355.Google Scholar
70. Stephens, , p. 122.Google Scholar
71. Ibid, p. 123.
72. Carlson, , The Italian Stage, p. 73.Google Scholar
73. Karlinsky, Simon, Russian Drama from Its Beginnings to the Age of Pushkin (Berkeley, California, 1985), P.305.Google Scholar
74. Johnston, William M., The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938 (Berkeley, California, 1983), p. 22Google Scholar; Yates, W. E., Nestroy (Cambridge, England, 1972), p. 150.Google Scholar
75. Musulin, Stella, Vienna in the Age of Mettemich (Boulder, Colorado, 1975), p. 259.Google Scholar
76. Hemmings, , p. 50.Google Scholar
77. Ibid.
78. Stephens, , p. 24Google Scholar
79. Martin, George, The Red Shirt and the Cross of Savoy: The Story of Italy's Risorgimento (New York, 1969), p. 219.Google Scholar
80. Carlson, , The Italian Stage, p. 72Google Scholar; Hearder, H. and Waley, D. P., A Short History of Italy (Cambridge, England, 1963), p. 131.Google Scholar
81. Brown, , p. 120.Google Scholar
82. Mayer, David, Harlequin in His Element: The English Pantomime, 1806–1836 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969) pp. 6, 50, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. Baldick, Robert, The Life and Times of Frederick Lemaitre (Fair Lawn, N.J., 1959) pp. 178–80Google Scholar; Stephens, , pp. 119–21.Google Scholar
84. On the free theatres, see Miller, Anna, The Independent Theater in Europe (New York, 1931)Google Scholar; Brockett, Oscar and Findlay, Robert, Century of Innovation: A History of European and American Theater and Drama Since 1870 (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973), pp. 89–111Google Scholar; Macgowan, , pp. 185–95Google Scholar; Roberts, , pp. 411–21.Google Scholar
85. Carlson, Marvin, The German Stage in the Nineteenth Century (Metuchen, N.J., 1972), p. 210.Google Scholar
86. Findlater, , p. 83.Google Scholar
87. Jelavich, , p. 172.Google Scholar
88. Jelavich, , pp. 170–3.Google Scholar For a similar incident, see Patterson, , p. 26.Google Scholar
89. Findlater, , p. 92Google Scholar; Stephens, , p. 143.Google Scholar
90. Pascal, , p. 276.Google Scholar
91. Conolly, , p. 11.Google Scholar
92. Quoted in Beman, Lamar, compiler, Selected Articles on Censorship of the Theater and of Moving Pictures (New York, 1931), p. 254.Google Scholar
93. Findlater, , p. 72.Google Scholar
94. Ibid, p. 91.
95. Varneke, , pp. 203–4.Google Scholar
96. Ibid, p. 302.
97. Ashton, Thomas, ‘The Censorship of Byron's Marino Faliero’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 36 (1972–1973), P.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98. Nestroy, Yates, pp. 149–50.Google Scholar
99. Grillparzer, Yates, p. 221.Google Scholar
100. Carter, , p. 141.Google Scholar
101. Osborne, John, The Naturalist Drama in Germany (Manchester, 1971), p. 119.Google Scholar
102. Beman, , p. 365.Google Scholar
103. Rearich, Charles, Pleasures of the Belle Epoque: Entertainment and Festivity in Turn-of-the-Century France (New Haven, Connecticut, 1980), pp. 43–8, 105.Google Scholar
104. Jelavich, , p. 253.Google Scholar
105. Beman, , p. 254Google Scholar; Findlater, , pp. 100–10Google Scholar; Jelavich, , p. 254.Google Scholar
106. Pascal, , p. 268.Google Scholar
107. Carlson, , The Italian Stage, p. 73Google Scholar; Macgowan, , p. 172.Google Scholar
108. Brockett, , p. 369Google Scholar; Macgowan, , p. 178Google Scholar; Carlson, , The German Stage, p. 121.Google Scholar