Article contents
The Playwright in an Institutionalized Theatre: France1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2009
Extract
To write of the situation of the dramatic author in present-day France is no easy task, since, inevitably, it involves making a largely negative report. Traditionally, the text in the theatre has been king; in schools and in universities, plays are above all read, and it is often – though perhaps not often enough – a revelation to those who study them to discover that the texts written by, say, Racine or Shakespeare, take on a different kind of existence when they are made flesh in the theatre. One of the qualities of such theatre is, of course, that it can be read and appreciated without any form of mediation, such as that provided, for example, by actors or directors. And it is perhaps odd that we may arguably derive as much from reading the plays of a Giraudoux, for whom the critical collaboration of his director, Louis Jouvet was crucial, as from seeing them performed. Could it be that the partnership of such a self-conscious writer with so committed a practical man of the theatre represents some kind of golden age in the relationship between the author and the director?
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1990
References
Notes
2. Beckett, Samuel, Breath and Other Shorts (London, 1971), p. 9.Google Scholar
3. Profession: Playwright! An International Survey of the Working Conditions of Playwrights (Havana, 1987).Google Scholar
4. Le Théâtre en France: ten 3O-minute programmes broadcast by Radio-France between 17 and 28 08 1981.Google Scholar
5. Simon, Alfred, Le Théâtre à bout de souffle? (Paris, 1979), p. 118.Google Scholar
6. Ibid., p. 20.
7. Quoted in Auteurs dramatiques français d'aujourd'hui (Amiens, 1984), p. 192.Google Scholar
8. Nichet, Jacques, ‘Faux en écriture’, in Auteurs dramatiques français d'aujourd'hui, op. cit., p. 55.Google Scholar
9. The texts published in this volume are those of papers given at a three-day colloquium organized by the Maison de la Culture d'Amiens in March 1983. The volume will henceforth be referred to as Auteurs dramatiques …
10. Op. cit., p. 8.Google Scholar
11. Vinaver, Michel, ‘Le Théâtre entre deux chaises: objet de spectacle, objet de lecture’, in Auteurs dramatiques …, p. 185.Google Scholar
12. Billetdoux, François, ‘L'Arlequin du doute’, in Auteurs dramatiques …, p. 164.Google Scholar
13. Simon, Alfred, op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar
14. Lhôte, Jean-Marie, ‘Doubles jeux’, in Auteurs dramatiques …, p. 10.Google Scholar
15. Le Théâtre en France, op. cit.: I. ‘La Décentralisation’, 17 08 1981.Google Scholar
16. Théophilidès, Viviane, ‘Est-ce qu'adapter c'est ecrire?’, in Auteurs dramatiques …, p. 50.Google Scholar
17. Poirot-Delpech, Bertrand, ‘Relâche chez les héritiers de Vilar’, Le Monde, 13 07 1972, p. 15Google Scholar. Quoted in Miller, Judith Graves, Theater and Revolution in France since 1968 (Lexington, Kentucky, 1977). pp. 137–8.Google Scholar
18. ‘La mise à l'ecart de trois sociétaires: Comédie-Française, le malaise’, interview with Colette Godard. Le Monde, 25 12 1987, p. 17.Google Scholar
19. Op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar
20. Kalisky, René, ‘Je refuse d'être mis plus longtemps à l'essai’, quoted from ‘Propos recueillis par Jean-Marie Lhôte’, ATAC informations (November 1976), in Auteurs français …, p. 205.Google Scholar
21. Haïm, Victor, ‘Gestation et développement de «Belles Familles»’, in Auteurs français …, p. 168.Google Scholar
22. Le Théâtre en France, op. cit.Google Scholar
23. Ibid.
24. Op. cit., p. 184.Google Scholar
25. Le Théâtre en France, op. cit.: 6Google Scholar. ‘Inspirations diverses des dernières années’, 24 08 1981.Google Scholar
26. Vinaver, 's Comple renduGoogle Scholar was first given during the Festival d'Avignon in July 1986, and was published by Actes Sud in 1987.
27. Le Compte rendu d'Avignon, p. 9.Google Scholar
28. Ibid., p. 16.
29. Ibid., p. 19.
30. Ibid., pp. 24–5.
31. Ibid., pp. 53–4.
32. Ibid., p. 54.
33. Ibid., p. 68.
34. The authors consulted by Vinaver were Hector Bianciotti, Michel Chaillou, Régine Desforges, Florence Delay, Jean Echenoz, Dominique Fernandez, Pierre Guyotat, Jacques Lanzmann, Michel Mohrt, Yann Queffélec, Catherine Rihoit, Angelo Rinaldi, Claude Simon, Philippe Sellers, and François Weyergans.
35. Ibid., p. 70.
36. Ibid., p. 70.
37. Ibid., pp. 56–9.
38. Some booksellers do make attempts to sell plays: see the chapter on ‘Les Librairies’ in Michel Vinaver's Compte rendu d'Avignon, ibid., pp. 35–40.
39. See Théâtre Ouvert à livre ouvert: de 1971 à 1988 (Paris, 1988)Google Scholar, and in particular the ‘Petit lexique récapitulatif des formules proposées par Thé’, pp. 139–40.Google Scholar
40. Planchon, Roger, ‘Un bunker de papier’, Le Monde, 30 06 1983Google Scholar. Quoted in Auteurs français …, p. 215.Google Scholar
41. Ibid., p. 218.
42. Le Théâtre en France: 6, op. cit.Google Scholar
43. Sandier, Gilles, Théâtre en crise (des années 70 à 82) (Grenoble, 1982), p. 456.Google Scholar
44. Abirached, Robert, ‘La politique des auteurs ai la Direction du Théâtre’, in Auteurs français …, p. 38.Google Scholar
45. Op. cit., pp. 456–7.Google Scholar
46. ‘La mise en trop’, Théâtre/Public, juillet-octobre 1988, pp. 69–72Google Scholar. The text is in fact that of a paper given by Vinaver at a colloquium on contemporary French and German theatre in Mainz, , from 28 04 to 1 05 1988.Google Scholar
47. Ibid., p. 69.
48. Ibid., p. 70.
49. Ibid., p. 71.
50. Op. cit., p. 22.Google Scholar
51. ‘Dans une conférence de presse, M. Jack Lang a proposé six mesures pour le théâtre’, Le Monde, 8 06, 1989, p. 18.Google Scholar
52. ‘Jacques Cousinet: un an à la Maison de la culture de La Rochelle. Avis de vent frais par l'ouest’, Le Monde, 9 08 1989, p. 13.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by