No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Margaret Webster's Henry VIII: The Survival of ‘Scenic Shakespeare’ in America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2009
Extract
On 6 November 1946, in New York City, three enterprising women of the theatre – Margaret Webster, Cheryl Crawford, and Eva La Gallienne – launched a noble experiment with a lavish production of Shakespeare's Henry VIII. Their goal was to found a national repertory company, modelled on the European national theatres, to be a home for the classics and a training ground for a new breed of classically trained American actors – ‘an American Old Vic’. Webster and her partners had been trained in such a tradition, and their dream of an American national theatre had been given additional impetus by the Old Vic's successful visit to New York in 1945. Despite the good wishes of the theatrical community, an able band of established actors (such as Walter Hampden, Victor Jory, and the founders themselves), and generally sympathetic critical notices, the fledgling American Repertory Theatre (ART) foundered financially after one season, and the dream was abandoned (though it has recently been revived by Peter Sellars and the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C.).
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1986
References
Notes
1. Webster, Margaret, Don't Put Your Daughter on the Stage, New York: Alfred Knopf, 1972, p. 151.Google Scholar
2. Hogan, Charles Beecher, Shakespeare in the Theatre: 1701–1800, Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1957. pp. 719–17.Google Scholar
3. Trewin, J. C., Shakespeare on the English Stage: 1900–64, London: Barrie and Rockliff, 1964, p. 322.Google Scholar
4. Eager, Helen, ‘Henry VIII’, The Boston Traveller, 8 10 1946.Google Scholar (Unpaginated clipping in the Harvard Theatre Collection.)
5. Don't, p. 128.Google Scholar
6. Booth, Michael R., ‘Beerbohm Tree's Henry VIII’, Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens, Vol. 8–10, 1985, p. 197.Google Scholar
7. Webster, Margaret, Shakespeare Without Tears, rev. ed., Cleveland: World Publishing Co., 1955, p. 266.Google Scholar
8. Booth, , p. 185.Google Scholar
9. Don't, p. 128.Google Scholar
10. Booth, , p. 184.Google Scholar
11. Atkinson, Brooks, ‘Henry VIII’, New York Times, 7 11 1946, p. 42, col. 2.Google Scholar
12. Wyatt, Euphemia Van Rensselaer, ‘The Drama’, Catholic World, Vol. 164, 12 1946, p. 259.Google Scholar
13. Booth, , p. 185.Google Scholar
14. Don't, p. 128.Google Scholar
15. Byrne, Muriel St. Clare, ‘A Stratford Production: Henry VIII’, Shakespeare Survey, Vol. 3, 1950, p. 128.Google Scholar
16. Don't, p. 127.Google Scholar
17. Hughes, Elinor, ‘The Theatre: King Henry VIH’, The Boston Herald, 8 10 1946.Google Scholar (Unpaginated clipping in the Harvard Theatre Collection.)
18. Wyatt, , p. 146.Google Scholar
19. Atkinson, , p. 42, col. 2.Google Scholar
20. Calta, Louis, ‘Henry VIII Now Called Musical’, The New York Times, 12 12 1946, p. 39, col. 1.Google Scholar
21. Booth, , p. 199.Google Scholar
22. Byrne, , p. 127.Google Scholar
23. Booth, , pp. 197–8.Google Scholar
24. Don't, p. 129.Google Scholar
25. Ibid., pp. 158–9.
26. Byrne, , p. 128.Google Scholar
27. Wyatt, , p. 59.Google Scholar
28. Walker, Roy, ‘Theatre Royal’, The Twentieth Century, 06 1953, p. 463.Google Scholar
29. Marshall, Norman, The Producer and the Play, London: Macdonald, 1957, p. 196.Google Scholar
30. Don't, p. 161.Google Scholar
31. Ibid., p. 173.