Article contents
The Kembles and Vocal Technique
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2009
Extract
Stage speech, like the other techniques of acting, such as gesture, movement, and the interpretation of character, has always been subject to the theatrical conventions of an age. The conventions, while superficially based on current fads and fashions are on a more profound level the result of an underlying creative method reflecting commonly held views about the correct or ‘natural’ methods of imitating nature on the stage. Nothing demonstrates the enormous changes in stage speech over the last hundred years more vividly than the few existing recordings made by actors who had most of their training and their careers in the mid-to-late nineteenth century.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1983
References
Notes
1. The recordings and artists mentioned are to be found on the Rococo label, Nos. 4002, and 4003.
2. Shaw quoted in Pearson, Hesketh, Beerbohm Tree, (London, 1956), p. 118Google Scholar; Pearson, Hesketh, The Last Actor-Managers (Books for Libraries repr. New York, of 1950 ed.), p. 41.Google Scholar
3. Gentleman's Magazine, LIII (1783), 309 10.Google Scholar
4. Supposed transcripts by Kemble of unpublished reviews of his participation in the debates, found in the beginning of Vol. I of Harvard Theatre Collections Kembliana; a collection of autograph letters, miscellaneous cuttings, etc., relative to J. P. Kemble and his brother Charles, comprising Biographical Memoranda, Anecdotes, Play Bills, Receipts for Salary etc., arranged and mounted in three Vols. (1787–1830).
5. Morning Chronicle, 1 10, 1783.Google Scholar
6. Morning Herald, 1 10 1783.Google Scholar
7. Dramatic Miscellanies (Dublin, 1784), III, 90Google Scholar; Gazetteer and New Daily Advertiser, 1 10 1783.Google Scholar
8. London Chronicle, 1 10 1783.Google Scholar
9. Morning Herald, 2 10 1783.Google Scholar
10. St. James's Chronicle, 2 10 1783Google Scholar; Morning Post, 1 10 1783.Google Scholar
11. St. James's Chronicle, loc. cit.
12. London Chronicle, 11 and 21 10 1783Google Scholar; Morning Chronicle, 24 10 1783.Google Scholar
13. Morning Herald, 22 09 1784.Google Scholar
14. Public Advertiser, 1 11 1784.Google Scholar
15. Public Advertiser, 26 04 1785Google Scholar; London Magazine (03, 1785), pp. 217–18.Google Scholar
16. St. James's Chronicle, 8 01 1785.Google Scholar
17. St. James's Chronicle, 20 03 1786.Google Scholar
18. [Williams, John,] The Children of Thespis (London, 1786), pp. 26–30.Google Scholar
19. 15 Dec. 1789.
20. Candid and Impartial Strictures on the performers belonging to Drury Lane, Covent Garden, and His Majesty's Theatres (London, 1795), p. 3.Google Scholar
21. Haslewood, Joseph, The Secret History of the Green Room (London, 1792), I, 325–26Google Scholar; Gilliland, Thomas, Dramatic Mirror (London, 1802), II, 807.Google Scholar
22. Brandes, Ernst, Bemekung über das Londoner, Pariser, and Wiener Theater (1786), p. 131.Google Scholar
23. (Anon.) Sittengemälde von London (1801)Google Scholar, quoted by Kelly, J. A., German Visitors to English Theatres in the Eighteenth Century (Princeton Univ. Press, 1936), p. 160.Google Scholar
24. Oracle, 17 09 1797.Google Scholar
25. Goede, Christian, The Stranger in England (London, 1807), III, p. 218, p. 224, p. 249.Google Scholar
26. Washington Irving, Journals and Notebooks 1803–1806, I (Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1969), 457.Google Scholar
27. Life and Letters of Washington Irving (New York, 1863), I, 157.Google Scholar
28. Cabinet, II (1807), 11.Google Scholar
29. Theatrical Inquisitor, IV (1814), 328.Google Scholar
30. Scourge, III (1812), 857–58, and IX (1815), 400.Google Scholar
31. Autograph letter to Frederick Jones of Dublin Theatre, 1815, in the Folger.
32. Bell's Weekly Messenger, 3 11 1816Google Scholar; Scourge, IX (1814), 415–24Google Scholar; Williams, John Ambrose, Memoirs of John Philip Kemble (London, 1817), p. 74.Google Scholar
33. Hunt, Leigh in Examiner, 5 02 1815Google Scholar; Scourge, loc. cit.
34. Stage, II (1815), 175.Google Scholar
35. Martin, Theodore, ‘An Eyewitness of John Kemble’, Nineteenth Century, VII (1880), 279–85.Google Scholar
36. Oracle, 27 09 1796Google Scholar; The Torrington Diaries, ed. Andrews, C. Bruyn (London, 1938), IV, 18–19.Google Scholar
37. Cumberland was reviewing Hunt's Critical Essays on the Performers of the London Theatres (1807)Google Scholar, in London Review, II, iii (1809), 4.Google Scholar
38. Boaden, James, Memoirs of the Life of John Philip Kemble (London, 1825), I, 334.Google Scholar
39. London Review, II, (1809), 522.Google Scholar
40. Many writers commented on this quality. See e.g. Oxberry's Dramatic and Histrionic Anecdotes (London, 1825), p. 188.Google Scholar
41. Times, 2 03 1812.Google Scholar
42. See Morschel-Wetzke, Eva, Der Sprechstil der Idealistischen Schauspiel Kunst (Emsdetten, 1956), p. 25.Google Scholar
43. Beau Monde, I (1806–1807), 107.Google Scholar
44. Bell's Weekly Messenger, 18 05 1817.Google Scholar
45. P. 49.
46. (Scolar Press repr., Menston, 1969, of 1781 ed.), p. 208.
47. Reynolds, , op. cit., pp. 58–60.Google Scholar
48. Monthly Mirror, NS, II (1807), 305.Google Scholar
49. Thespian Magazine and Literary Repository, III (04, 1794), 188.Google Scholar
50. p. 109, p. 113, p. 135.
51. (Scolar Press, repr., Menston, 1971, of 1785 ed.), pp. 44–59.
52. p. 52.
53. pp. 52–3
54. Memoirs of Kemble, I, 175–6.Google Scholar
55. pp. 340–1, p. 344, p. 332.
56. Baker, Herschel, John Philip Kemble: The Actor in his Theatre (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1942), p. 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Chironomia, p. 209.Google Scholar
58. Holcroft, Thomas, The Theatrical Recorder (London, 1805), I, 274.Google Scholar
59. Morning Chronicle, 21 06 1817.Google Scholar
60. Bell's Weekly Messenger, 5 11 1815.Google Scholar
61. Sheridan, , Rhetorical Grammar, pp. 135–6.Google Scholar
62. Monthly Mirror, XIV (1802), 215.Google Scholar
63. See Morschel-Wetzke, , op. cit., p. 21, p. 10Google Scholar; see also Goethe's Rule 21 from the ‘Rules for Actors’, in Actors on Acting, ed. Cole, Toby and Chinoy, Helen Crich (New York, 1970), p. 271.Google Scholar
64. Memoirs of Kemble, I, 176–7.Google Scholar
65. op. cit., p. 120; see also Pickering, Roger, Reflections upon Theatrical Expression in Tragedy (London, 1755)Google Scholar, who had asked actors to aim for ‘a full and flowing, melodious articulation’, (p. 24).
66. op. cit., p. 26.
67. 2 Vols., I, Plates 1 and 2 (Scholar Press repr., Menston, 1969).
68. (Scolar Press repr., Menston, 1970), p. 8.
69. The Game of Hearts: Harriette Wilson's Memoirs, ed. Bland, Lesley (New York, 1955), p. 241.Google Scholar
70. See Bruford, W. H., Theatre, Drama and Audience in Goethe's Germany (London, 1950), p. 304Google Scholar; Genast, Eduard, Aus Weimars Klassischer und Nachklassischer Zeit (Stuttgart, 1904)Google Scholar; Wetzke, Morschel, op. cit., p. 13, p. 23.Google Scholar
71. London Review, II iii (1809), 13.Google Scholar
72. Retrospective Review, I (1820).Google Scholar
73. Chironomia, p. 63.Google Scholar
74. Pickering, Roger, op. cit., p. 28.Google Scholar
75. Lecture VI; see also Austin, , Chironomia, pp. 63–6.Google Scholar
76. Goede, , The Stranger in England, III, 217.Google Scholar
77. Critical Observations on Mr Kemble's Performances at the Theatre Royal, Liverpool (Liverpool, 1811), p. 20.Google Scholar
78. Clipping in Green Room Gossip; or Gravity Gallinimpt: a Gallimaufry (1809), Folger, W. a. 40.
79. Cabinet, I (1807), 205.Google Scholar
80. Liverpool, loc. cit.
81. Macready's Reminiscences (London, 1875), I, 136.Google Scholar
82. Liverpool, p. 39.Google Scholar
83. Chironomia, p. 80.Google Scholar
84. Monthly Mirror, NS, III (1808), 462Google Scholar; Morning Post, 25 06 1788Google Scholar; Sun, 9 01 1801Google Scholar; Satirist, II (1808), 442Google Scholar; Monthly Mirror, X (1801), 153.Google Scholar
85. Beau Monde, IV (1809), 38Google Scholar; Monthly Mirror, NS, VIII (1810), 307.Google Scholar
86. Goede, , op. cit., p. 213, p. 217.Google Scholar
87. Monthly Mirror, VII (26 04 1799)Google Scholar, and NS, VIII (28 11 1810).Google Scholar
88. Cabinet, I (1807), 205.Google Scholar
89. Goede, , op. cit., pp. 226–7.Google Scholar
90. Hunt, Leigh, Autobiography (London, 1850), I, 292–93Google Scholar; Dramatic Censor for 1811, p. 423Google Scholar; Cabinet, I (1807), 138Google Scholar; Monthly Mirror, II (1807)Google Scholar; Fitzgerald, Percy, The Kembles (London, 1871), II, 353–64.Google Scholar
91. Chironomia, pp. 48–9.Google Scholar
92. Walker, 's A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary (London, 1791)Google Scholar, had a great influence throughout the nineteenth century. See Holmberg, Borje, On the Concept of Standard English and the History of Modern English Pronunciation (Lund, 1964).Google Scholar See also Nares, Robert, Elements of Orthoepy (London, 1784).Google Scholar
93. Boaden, , Memoirs of Kemble, II, 535.Google Scholar
94. Chironomia, p. 49.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by