Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:09:53.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coriolanus and Stavisky: The Interpenetration of Art and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2009

Felicia Hardison Londré
Felicia Hardison Londré
Affiliation:
Felicia Londre isProfessor of Theatre at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and Dramaturg for Missouri Repertory Theatre.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Repeatedly throughout French theatre history two subjects have aroused the passions of the French theatregoer: art and politics. The famous opening-night riots at Le Cid in 1636, Hernani in 1830, and Ubu roi in 1896 all resulted in the overthrow of stale artistic conventions by the new art that each of these works represented. Examples of productions that had political repercussions are abundant – like the historical dramas of Marie-Joseph Chénier that did so much to promote the French Revolution (until his Caius Gracchus in 1792 caused a backlash demonstration), or the 1943 Comédie-Française production of Claudel's mystico-religious Soulier de satin that was gleefully interpreted by the French in German-occupied Paris as ‘resistance theatre’. One noteworthy theatrical event that succeeded in arousing both artistic and political passions was not even a French play – nor was it contemporary, although the most often-repeated comment about it was: ‘It seems to have been written just yesterday.’ This was a production of Shakespeare's Coriolanus at the Comédie-Française in the 1933–4 season, just at the time when the Third Republic was nearly toppled by the public's response to press revelations of the Stavisky scandal.

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Research International , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Summer 1986 , pp. 119 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Reuillard, Gabriel, ‘Quand le public manifeste aux representations de “Coriolan” à la Comédie-Française’, Excelsior (28 01 1934).Google Scholar

2. An Observer, ‘The Stavisky Scandal’, The Atlantic Monthly, XV (03 1934), p. 358.Google Scholar

3. Piachaud, René-Louis, ‘La Tragédie de Coriolan’, La Petite Illustration, No. 661 (10 02 1934), p. 22.Google Scholar

4. Seaver, Richard, ‘Introduction’, Stavisky: the Script (New York, 1974), pp. xi–xii.Google Scholar

5. Werth, Alexander, France in Ferment (New York, 1935), p. 84.Google Scholar

6. Seaver, , p. xv.Google Scholar

7. Werth, , p. 80.Google Scholar

8. Kermode, Frank, ‘Coriolanus’, The Riverside Shakespeare (Boston, 1974), p. 1394.Google Scholar

9. Palmer, John, ‘Coriolanus and M. Stavisky’, The Times (20 02 1934), p. 12.Google Scholar

10. Champion, Edouard, La Comédie-Française: années 1933 et 1934 (Paris, 1935), pp. 163–4.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., p. 164.

12. Cohn, Ruby, Modern Shakespeare Offshoots (Princeton, 1976), p. 13.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 14.

14. ‘La Quinzaine théâtrale’, Le Courier du Centre (Limoges, 10 01 1934).Google Scholar

15. Champion, , pp. 177–81Google Scholar. The extras (205 men, 20 women, and 6 children) were cast as follows: 92 common people, 30 Roman soldiers, 10 Roman lictors, 4 standard-bearers, 40 senators, 3 high priests, 10 Volscian soldiers, 3 Volscian officers, 3 Volscian nobles, 4 young women in white, 10xs ladiesin-waiting to Volumnia, 6 women of the people, 6 children.

16. Watermeier, Daniel J., ‘Coriolanus’, Notable International Shakespeare Revivals: The Post-War Years (to be published by Greenwood Press in 1986).Google Scholar

17. Ibid.

18. Perie, Louis, ‘La Politique au théâtre’, Marseille Soir (2 01 1934).Google Scholar

19. Chevalley, Sylvie, La Comédie-Française hier et aujourd'hui (Paris, 1970), p. 57.Google Scholar

20. ‘La Quinzaine théâtrale’.

21. ‘Pessimism on the French Stage’, Literary Digest, CXIV (10 12 1932), p. 13.Google Scholar

22. ‘Le Théâtre à Paris’, undocumented clipping from the Bibliotheque-Musée de la Comédie-Française.

23. Boissy, Gabriel, ‘Coriolan: Le plus beau spectacle actuel’, Comadia illustré (6 01 1934).Google Scholar

24. Champion, , p. 179.Google Scholar

25. Semenoff, Marc, ‘Théâtre de la Comédie-Française’, Rampe (1 01 1934).Google Scholar

26. The following were cast in the major roles: Léon Bernard (Menenius Agrippa), Alexandre (Caius Marcius/Coriolan), Denis d'Inès (Sicinius Velutus), Charles Granval (Brutus), Jean Hervé (Tullius Aufidius), André Bacqué (Cominius), Pierre Dux (Un Serviteur), Colonna Romano (Volumnie), Vera Korène (Virgilie).

27. Champion, , p. 172.Google Scholar

28. Ibid., p. 167.

29. Piachaud, , p. 22.Google Scholar

30. Knapp, Wilfred, France: Partial Eclipse (New York, 1972), p. 30.Google Scholar

31. Werth, , p. 76.Google Scholar

32. Anonymous, ‘The Paris Riots: The Story of an Eyewitness’, Harper's Magazine, CLXVIII (05 1934), p. 707.Google Scholar

33. Werth, , pp. 86–7.Google Scholar

34. Anonymous, p. 708.Google Scholar

35. Werth, , pp. 86–90.Google Scholar

36. Ibid., p. 91.

37. Werth, Alexander, ‘The Stavisky Tragi-Comedy’, The New Statesman and Nation, VII (14 04 1934), p. 538.Google Scholar

38. Reuillard.

39. Ibid.; see also Champion, , pp. 101, 183.Google Scholar

40. ‘Coups d'ceil en coulisse’, Œil de Paris (27 01 1934).Google Scholar

41. Werth, , France in Ferment, p. 127.Google Scholar

42. ‘La Représentation mouvementée de “Coriolan”’ (dateline 5 02)Google Scholar, undocumented clipping from the Bibliothèque-Musée de la Comédie-Française.

43. Ibid.

44. Dateline Paris, 5 02 1934Google Scholar, undocumented clipping from the Bibliothèque-Musée de la Comédie-Française.

45. ‘Coriolan’, Écho de la Loire (7 02 1934).Google Scholar

46. Barreyre, Jean, ‘Coriolan (Comédie-Française)’, Ric et Rac (3 03 1934).Google Scholar

47. Werth, , France in Ferment, p. 142.Google Scholar

48. Knapp, , pp. 21–3.Google Scholar

49. Anonymous, p. 710.Google Scholar

50. Champion, , p. 183.Google Scholar

51. ‘Shakespeare interdit à la Comédie-Française’, Action Française (4 03 1934).Google Scholar

52. Le Matin (4 03 1934).Google Scholar

53. Champion, , p. 102.Google Scholar

54. Le Matin.

55. ‘On jouera “Coriolan” à la Comédie Française’, Action Française (5 03 1934).Google Scholar

56. Champion, , p. 185.Google Scholar

57. Ibid.

58. Lorcey, Jacques, La Comédie-Française (Paris, 1981), p. 89.Google Scholar

59. Hobson, Harold, French Theatre since 1830 (London, 1979), p. 166.Google Scholar

60. Lesage, Laurent, Jean Giraudoux: His Life and Work (University Park, 1979), p. 72.Google Scholar