No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Glasgow's Tramway: Little Diagilevs and Large Ambitions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2009
Extract
When dawn broke on 1 January 1991, Glasgow's year as European City of Culture was over. It was time to count the cost, £32 million it emerged, to pick up the pieces and to begin the inquest. As Glasgow is a city self-conscious to a fault, with an infinite capacity for self-analysis and self-flagellation, the inquest began long before 1990 had even dawned. The predictable round of ‘Whose City?’ and ‘What Culture?’ articles poured out as soon as Glasow had been awarded the title in 1986. Predictably, many of those early doubters ended up getting involved in the City of Culture events and profiting from them. Indeed, even those most virulently opposed to the whole notion, a group called ‘Workers City’, which rallied around the Glasgow novelist James Kellman, provided what was possibly the year's most entertaining and certainly longest running event. The furious and intensely public debate centred on the ramifications of the £4 million lost by an exhibition called Glasgow's Glasgow.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1992
References
Notes
1. Lally, Pat, Leader of Glasgow City Council, Press Release Glasgow City Council, 3 02 1992.Google Scholar
2. Introduction to an unpublished report on the commissioning policy of the Third Eye Centre, May 1991.
3. Even today tickets for the Citizens's cost only £5, with concessions at £1.
4. The List. 12 01 1990.Google Scholar
5. The Scotsman. 1 01 1990.Google Scholar
6. Interview with the artist—14 February 1991.
7. The Economic Importance of the Arts in Glasgow. London: Policy Studies Institute, 1990.Google Scholar
8. ‘Britons Abroad,’ The Arts Business, summer 1991, p. 3.Google Scholar