Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:25:26.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why choose psychiatry? Report on a qualitative workshop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Michael Paddock
Affiliation:
Northwick Park Hospital, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, email: [email protected]
Kitty Farooq
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, UK
S. Neil Sarkar
Affiliation:
Primary Care Liaison Psychiatry, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, UK
Tulha Aga
Affiliation:
Medway Recovery Team, Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Gillingham, UK
Greg Lydall
Affiliation:
Castel Hospital, Guernsey, Channel Islands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2013

As trainees, we thought that examining the views of trainees who have already chosen psychiatry might add to our understanding of the factors involved in career choice.

In November 2009, the London Deanery School of Psychiatry hosted its annual trainee conference themed ‘Recruitment - Everybody’s Business’. There we facilitated two identical, optional qualitative workshops entitled ‘Choosing psychiatry as a career - influencing the next generation’. Each workshop was attended by 30 individuals, and facilitated by 5 senior trainees and 4 medical students who took verbatim notes. Framing questions were used to identify key themes regarding positive and negative influences on career choice.

Of the 184 delegates, 86 (47%) were male and 106 (58%) reported Black and minority ethnic backgrounds. Two of us (M.P. and K.F.) used thematic coding until saturation of themes emerged. We report these themes briefly here.

Participants described the doctor-patient relationship, the human narrative (‘psychiatry is about stories, rather than abstract algorithms’), and the rapidly evolving nature of psychiatry (‘you can do things which are ground-breaking’) as attractors to the field. They emphasised the importance of conveying the high work satisfaction and good work-life balance, job flexibility, and ‘colourful colleagues [who make it] fun’ to medical students.

Factors that nearly discouraged trainees from a career in psychiatry included stigma and negative attitudes towards the profession from colleagues. Several trainees described unhelpful experiences during their foundation years: being ‘ignored by a consultant surgeon after disclosing an interest in psychiatry’, and how physician colleagues ‘did not have a positive thing to say about the specialty’. Medical student participants as a subgroup also commented on the effect of negative attitudes from other professionals (‘boring job’, being seen as ‘less of a doctor’ and ‘becoming mad as a psychiatrist’). Such inter-professional stigma towards psychiatry has been reported to negatively influence choice of psychiatry as a career. Reference Buchanan and Bhugra1,Reference Holmes, Tumiel-Berhalter, Zayas and Watkins2 Intra-professional stigma and ‘negative attitudes and behaviour’ were observed among teachers, who were reportedly ‘a bit embarrassed about being psychiatrists’. A further theme was the lack of professional confidence and evident role uncertainty among psychiatrists: ‘Psychiatrists have big issues with the specialty they’ve chosen - we don’t feel confident we’re as valuable as other medical specialties; we’re not sure what our role is and what we contribute’.

When trainee psychiatrists were asked what they could do individually and collectively to inspire the next generation, the main emphasis was on high-quality teaching and clinical placements, making time for experiential teaching, and helping students to feel part of the team. The importance of positive modelling by psychiatrists Reference McParland, Noble and Livingstone3,Reference Plaice, Heard and Moss4 was also noted, for example, being ‘passionate about psychiatry’.

Changes in attitude and perception, both within and without psychiatry, along with improved student placements, role modelling and teaching quality must occur if we are to address low recruitment and, in the words of one of the participants, ‘make the specialty something to aspire to, rather than something into which people drift’.

References

1 Buchanan, A, Bhugra, D. Attitude of the medical profession to psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992; 85: 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Holmes, D, Tumiel-Berhalter, LM, Zayas, LE, Watkins, R. Bashing of medical specialties: students' experiences and recommendations. Fam Med 2008; 40: 400–6.Google Scholar
3 McParland, M, Noble, LM, Livingstone, G. The effect of a psychiatric attachment on students' attitudes to and intention to pursue psychiatry as a career. Med Educ 2003; 37: 447–54.Google Scholar
4 Plaice, E, Heard, S, Moss, F. How important are role models in making good doctors? BMJ 2002; 325: 707–10.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.