Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T17:38:28.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welcome to the C4 World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Thure E. Cerling  and
James R. Ehleringer
Thure E. Cerling
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA
James R. Ehleringer
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA
Get access

Extract

There are two principal mechanisms of photosynthesis amongst the plants of the world. One produces a 3-carbon compound as the primary photosynthate and is called C3 photosynthesis. The other produces a 4-carbon compound as its primary photosynthate and is called C4 photosynthesis. This latter method is of rather recent origin, and its inception had important consequences for the flora and fauna of the world. The C4 plants make up a significant portion of global net primary productivity, especially in low latitudes. C4 plants are predominantly warm-season grasses, while C3 plants include most dicotyledons and cool-season monocotyledons. In this review we answer the questions about how C4 photosynthesis differs from C3 photosynthesis, where C4 plants are found, and review the paleoecological history of C4 photosynthesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 6: Phanerozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems , November 2000 , pp. 273 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, M. M. 1968. Mass spectrometric studies of carbon-13 variations in corn and other grasses. Radiocarbon, 10: 468–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerling, T. E. 1984. The stable isotopic composition of modern soil carbonate and its relationship to climate. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 71: 229–240.Google Scholar
Cerling, T. E. 1999. Paleorecords of C4 plants and ecosystems, p. 445–469. In Sage, R. F. and Monson, R. K. (eds.), C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press., San Diego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerling, T. E., MacFadden, B. J., Leakey, M.G., Quade, J., Eisenmann, V., and Ehleringer, J. R. 1997. Global vegetation change through the Miocene and Pliocene. Nature, 389: 153–158.Google Scholar
Cerling, T. E., MacFadden, B. J., Leakey, M.G., Quade, J., Eisenmann, V., and Ehleringer, J. R. 1999. Carbon isotope fractionation between diet and bioapatite in ungulate mammals and implications for ecological and paleoecological studies. Oecologia, 120: 347–363.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. P. 1996. The Biology of Grasses. CAB International, Wallingford. 274 p.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. P. and Peat, W. E. 1992. An Introduction to the Grasses. CAB International, Wallingford. 111 p.Google Scholar
Collatz, G. J., Berry, J. A., and Clark, J. S. 1998. Effects of climate and atmospheric CO2 partial pressure on the global distribution of C4 grasses: present, past and future. Oecologia, 114: 441–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, H., 1954. Carbon-13 in plants and the relationships between carbon-13 and carbon-14 variations in nature. Journal of Geology, 62: 115–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dengler, N. G. and Nelson, T. 1999. Leaf structure and development in C4 plants, p. 133–172. In Sage, R. F. and Monson, R. K. (eds.), C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press., San Diego.Google Scholar
Dugas, D. P. and Retallack, G. J. 1993. Middle Miocene fossil grasses from Fort Ternan, Kenya. Journal of Paleontology, 67: 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehleringer, J. R. 1978. Implications of quantum yield differences on the distribution of C3 and C4 grasses. Oecologia, 31:255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehleringer, J. R., and Cooper, T. A. 1988. Correlations between carbon isotope ratio and microhabitat in desert plants. Oecologia, 76, 562–566.Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J. R., Cerling, T. E., and Helliker, B. R. 1997. C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate. Oecologia, 112,285–299.Google Scholar
Farquhar, G. D., O'Leary, M. H., and Berry, J. A. 1982. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 9:121–137.Google Scholar
Haberlandt, G. 1884. Physiological Plant Anatomy. Macmillon, New Yorkm 777 p.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. D., and Slack, C. R. 1966. Photosynthesis in sugarcane leaves: a new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation. Biochemical Journal, 103–111.Google Scholar
Hattersley, P. W. 1982. 13C values of C4 types in grasses. Australian journal of Plant Physiology, 9: 139–154.Google Scholar
Hattersley, P. W. 1992. C4 photosynthetic pathway variation in grasses (Poaceae): its significance for arid and semi-arid lands, p. 181–212. In Desertified Grasslands: Their Biology and Management., The Linnean Society of London, London.Google Scholar
Jorden, D. B. and Ogren, W. L. 1984. The CO2/O2 specificity of the ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase dependence on ribulosebiphosphate concentrations, pH, and temperature. Planta, 21:309–313.Google Scholar
Kanai, R., and Edwards, G. E. 1999. The biochemistry of C4 photosynthesis, p. 49–87. In Age, R. F., and Monson, R. K. (eds), C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kortschak, H. P., Hartt, C. E., and Burr, G. O. 1965. Carbon dioxide fixation in sugarcane leaves. Plant Physiology, 40:209–213.Google Scholar
Macfadden, B. J. 1992. Fossil Horses: Systematics, Paleobiology, and Evolution of the Family Equidae. Cambridge University Press. 369 p.Google Scholar
Ode, D. J., Tieszen, L.L., and Lerman, C. J. 1980. The seasonal contribution of C3 and C4 plant species to primary production in a mixed prairie. Ecology, 61: 1304–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagani, M., Arthur, M. A., and Freeman, K. H. 1999a. Miocene evolution of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Paleoceanography, 14: 273–292.Google Scholar
Pagani, M., Arthur, M. A., Freeman, K. H., and Arthur, M. A. 1999b. Late Miocene atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the expansion of C4 grasses. Science, 285: 876–879.Google Scholar
P'Yankov, V. I. 1997. C4-species of high-mountain deserts of eastern Pamir. Russian Journal of Ecology, 24:156–160.Google Scholar
Quade, J., Cerling, T. E., and Bowman, J. R. 1989. Development of Asian monsoon revealed by marked ecological shift during the latest Miocene in Northern Pakistan. Nature, 342:163–166.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F., and Monson, R. K. (eds.). 1999. C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, 596.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F., Li, M., and Monson, R. K. 1999a. The taxonomic distribution of C4 photosynthesis. In Sage, R. F. and Monson, R. K. (eds.), C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press., San Diego, p. 551–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sage, R. F., Wedin, D.A., and Li, M. 1999b. The biogeography of C4 photosynthesis: patterns and controlling factors, p. 313–373. In Sage, R. F. and Monson, R. K. (eds.), C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Shantz, H. L. and Piemeisel, L. N. 1927. The water requirements of plants at Akron Colorado. Journal of Agricultural Research, 34: 1093–1189.Google Scholar
Teeri, J. A. and Stowe, L. G. 1976. Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America. Oecologia, 23: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tidwell, W. D., and Nambudiri, E. M. V. 1989. Tomlinsonia thomassonii, gen. et sp. nov., a permineralized grass from the Upper Miocene Ricardo Formation, California. Reviews of Paleobotany and Palynology, 60: 165–177.Google Scholar
Van Der Merwe, N. J., and Medina, E. 1989. Photosynthesis and 13C/12C ratios in Amazonian rain forests. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 1091–1094.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. C., Fuls, A., and Ellis, R. P. 1978. The geographical distribution of Kranz grasses in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 74, 209–215.Google Scholar
Wickman, F. E. 1952. Variations in the relative abundance of the carbon isotopes in plants. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2:243–252.Google Scholar