Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:25:46.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental patterns in the origin and diversification loci of Early Cambrian skeletalized Metazoa: Evidence from the Avalon microcontinent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Ed Landing  and
Stephen R. Westrop
Ed Landing
Affiliation:
New York State Museum, Albany, New York 12230
Stephen R. Westrop
Affiliation:
Oklahoma Museum of Natural History and School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73072
Get access

Abstract

The Cambrian Radiation was expressed as major changes in marine communities. High-diversity skeletalized metazoan faunas appeared and persisted with little change in the most proximal onshore habitats and show little expansion into the offshore through much of the long (ca. 24 m.y.) pretrilobitic Placentian Epoch on the Avalon microcontinent. These small shelly fossil communities and a large number of coelomate burrowers that appeared earlier in the Placentian comprise the Placentian Ecologic Evolutionary Unit (new)—the initial stage of the Cambrian Evolutionary Fauna. Early members of a number of high-level metazoan groups were concentrated in onshore habitats vacated by the demise of the Ediacaran fauna, where they diversified and, possibly, originated no earlier than latter part of the Placentian Epoch (543–ca. 519 (m.y.a.). Development of unstable substrates and predation in open shelf habitats occupied coelomate trace producers may have been a key factor in the restriction of diverse skeletalized metazoan faunas to peritidal habitats, where mineralized skeletons may have served as protection from desiccation and UV-damage. In contrast, the oldest trilobites are most diverse and abundant in offshore habitats, and their appearance in habitats dominated by large trace producers suggests a protective role of their mineralized integument.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 10: Neoproterozoic-Cambrian Biological Revolutions , November 2004 , pp. 93 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bengtson, S., and Conway Morris, S. 1992. Early radiation of biomineralizing phyla, p. 447–481. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology, Vol. 10, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bottjer, D., and Jablonski, D. 1988. Paleoenvironmental patterns in the evolution of post-Paleozoic benthic marine invertebrates. Palaios, 3:540–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, M. 1979. The Cambrian radiation event, p. 103–159. In House, M.R. (ed.), The Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups. The Systematics Association Special Vol. 12, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. 1980. The Lower Cambrian transgression and glauconite-phosphate facies in western Europe. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 137:695–703.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. 1982. Sea-level changes, facies changes and the late Precambrian–Early Cambrian evolutionary explosion. Precambrian Research, 17:105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, M.D. 1985. Evolutionary and geological events across the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. Geology Today, Sept–Oct 1985:141–146.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. 1986. Why do lower plants and animals biomineralize? Paleobiology, 12:241–250.Google Scholar
Brasier, M.D. 1992. Paleooceanography and changes in the biological cycling of phosphorus across the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary, p. 483–523. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology 10, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C.E., Ivany, L.C., and Schopf, K.M. 1996. Coordinated stasis: and overview. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 127: 1–20.Google Scholar
Budd, G.E., and Jensen, S. 2000. A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla. Biological Reviews, 75:253–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christie-Blick, N., Grotzinger, J.P., and Von Der Buch, C.C. 1988. Sequence stratigraphy in Proterozoic successions. Geology, 16:100–104.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Peel, J.S. 1995. Articulated halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland and their role in early protostome evolution. Philosophical Transations of the Royal Society of London, B, 347: 305–358.Google Scholar
Cook, P.J., and Shergold, J.H. 1984. Phosphorus, phosphorites, and skeletal evolution at the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. Nature, 308:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droser, M.L., and Li, X. 2001. The Cambrian Radiation and the diversification of sedimentary fabrics, p. 137–170. In Zhuravlev, A. Yu. and Riding, R. (eds.), The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, 525 p. Google Scholar
Droser, M.L., Jensen, S., and Gehling, J.G. 2002. Trace fossils and substrates of the terminal Proterozoic–Cambrian transition: implications for the record of early bilaterians and sediment mixing. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99:12572–12576.Google Scholar
Gravestock, D.I., and Shergold, J.H. 2001. Australian Early and Middle Cambrian sequence stratigraphy with implications for species diversity and correlation, p. 109–136. In Zhuravlev, A. Yu. and Riding, R. (eds.), The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, 525 p. Google Scholar
Isachsen, C.E., Bowring, S.A., Landing, E., and Samson, S.D. 1994. New constraint on the division of Cambrian time. Geology, 22:496–498.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Bottjer, D.J. 1983. Soft-bodied epifaunal suspension-feeding assemblages in the Late Cretaceous, p. 747–812. In Tevesz, M.J.S. and McCall, P.L. (eds.), Biotic Interaction in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., Sepkoski, J.J. Jr., Bottjer, D.J., and Sheehan, P.M. 1983. Onshore–offshore patterns in the evolution of Phanerozoic shelf communities. Science, 222:1123–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, R.J.F. 1992. Functional and ecological aspects of Ediacaran assemblages, p. 131–176. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology, Vol. 10, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppie, J.D., Nance, R.D., Murphy, J.B., and Dostal, J. 2003. Tethyan, Mediterranean, and Pacific analogues for the Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic birth and development of peri-Gondwanan terranes and their transfer to Laurentia and Laurussia. Tectonophysics, 365:195–219.Google Scholar
Kouchinsky, A.V. 2001. Mollusks, hyoliths, stenothecoids, and coeloscleritophorans, p. 326–349. In Zhuravlev, A. Yu. and Riding, R. (eds.), The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, 525 p. Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1992. Lower Cambrian of southeastern Newfoundland, p. 283–309. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology, Vol. 10, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1993. In situ earliest Cambrian tube worms and the oldest metazoan-constructed biostrome (Placentian Series, southeastern Newfoundland). Journal of Paleontology, 67:333–342, Figs. 1.1–4.3.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1994. Precambrian–Cambrian global stratotype ratified and a new perspective of Cambrian time. Geology, 22:179–182, Figs. 1–2B.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1996. Avalon—Insular continent by the latest Precambrian, p. 27–64, Figs. 1–8. In Nance, R.D. and Thompson, M. (eds.), Avalonian and related peri-Gondwanan terranes of the circum-North Atlantic. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 304.Google Scholar
Landing, E., and Benus, A.P. 1988. Stratigraphy of the Bonavista Group, southeastern Newfoundland: Growth faults and the distribution of the sub-trilobitic Lower Cambrian, p. 59–71. In Landing, E., Narbonne, G.M., and Myrow, P. (eds.), Trace fossils, small shelly fossils, and the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. New York State Museum Bulletin 463, 81 p. Google Scholar
Landing, E., and Westrop, S.R. 1998. Cambrian faunal sequence and depositional history of Avalonian Newfoundland and New Brunswick: Field workshop, p. 5–75. In Landing, E. and Westrop, S.R. (eds.), Avalon 1997—The Cambrian standard. Third International Field Conference of the Cambrian Chronostratigraphy Working Group and I.G.C.P. Project 366 (Ecological Aspects of the Cambrian Radiation). New York State Museum Bulletin 492, 92 p. Google Scholar
Landing, E., Myrow, P., Benus, A.P., and Narbonne, G.M. 1989. The Placentian Series: Appearance off the oldest skeletalized faunas in southeastern Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology, 63:739–769, Figs. 1–12.16, Tables 1,2.Google Scholar
Lipps, J.W., and Signor, P.W. 1992. Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa, p. 3–23. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology 10, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mcilroy, D., and Szaniawski, H., 2000. A lower Cambrian protoconodont apparatus from the Placentian of southeastern Newfoundland. Lethaia, 33: 95–102.Google Scholar
Mckerrow, W.S., Scotese, C.R., and Brasier, M.D. 1992. Early Cambrian continental reconstructions. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 149:599–606.Google Scholar
Mount, J.F., and Signor, P.W. 1985. Early Cambrian innovation in shallow subtidal environments: paleoenvironments of Early Cambrian small shelly fossils. Geology, 13:730–733.Google Scholar
Mount, J.F., and Signor, P.W. 1992. Faunas and facies—Fact and artifact. Paleoenvironmental controld on the distribution of Early Cambrian faunas, p. 27–51. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology, Vol. 10, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Myrow, P.M., and Landing, E., 1992. Mixed siliciclastic-carbonate deposition in a Lower Cambrian oxygen-stratified basin, Chapel Island Formation, southeastern Newfoundland. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 62:455–473.Google Scholar
Narbonne, G.M., Myrow, P.M., Landing, E., and Anderson, M.M. 1987. A candidate stratotype for the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary, Fortune Head, Burin Peninsula, southeastern Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 24:1277–1293.Google Scholar
Popov, L. Ye. 1992. The Cambrian radiation of brachiopods, p. 399–423. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology 10, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J.J. Jr. 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology, 7: 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J.J. Jr., and Miller, A.I. 1985. Evolutionary faunas and the Paleozoic benthic communities in space and time, p. 153–190. In Valentine, J.W. (ed.), Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 245 p. Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J.J. Jr., and Sheehan, P.M. Diversification, faunal change, and community replacement during the Ordovician radiations, p. 673–717. In Tevesz, M.J.S. and McCall, P.L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum Press, New York, 837 p. Google Scholar
Sheehan, P.M. 1996. A new look at ecologic evolutionary units. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 127:21–32.Google Scholar
Stasek, C.R. 1972. The molluscan framework. Chemical Zoology, 12:1–44.Google Scholar
Signor, P.W., and Lipps, J.H. 1992. Origin and early radiation of the Metazoa, p. 3–23. In Lipps, J.H. and Signor, P.W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Topics in Geobiology, Vol. 10, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Westrop, S.R., and Adrain, J.M. 1998. Trilobite alpha diversity and the rorganization of Ordovician benthic marine communities. Paleobiology, 24: 1–16.Google Scholar
Westrop, S.R., Tremblay, J.V., and Landing, E. 1995. Declining importance of trilobites in Ordovician nearshore communities: dilution or displacement. Palaios, 10:75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, G.A., Levinton, J.S., and Shapiro, L.H. 1996. Molecular evidence for deep Precambrian divergences among metazoan phyla. Science, 274:568–573.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 2001. Biotic diversity and structure during the Neoproterozoic–Ordovician transition, p. 174–199. In Zhuravlev, A. Yu. and Riding, R. (eds.), The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, 525 p. Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., and Riding, R. (eds.). The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York, 525 p.Google Scholar