Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:26:49.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Meaning of Biotic Succession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Richard K. Bambach
Richard K. Bambach*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0420, email [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Determination of the time sequence in the geologic record is a logical process that involves little “guesswork.” The geologic time scale is real, not a circular argument developed to show evolution. By applying Occam's Razor and assuming continuity, it is clear that biotic succession in apparent lineages demonstrates that species are capable of giving rise to others through modification with descent and have done so through geologic time. Although the fossil record is incomplete, biotic succession on a large scale provides a clear and unambiguous outline of the history of the change in life over time.

Science seeks explanations for observations and facts that begin as hypotheses. When hypotheses successfully survive rigorous testing, they mature into accepted theories. Evolution is the theory accepted as the explanation for the facts of biotic succession. The operational processes invoked in the theory of evolution (such as mutation, natural selection, isolation, and genetic drift) have been successfully tested many times. The general pattern of biotic succession follows the path expected or predicted for the course of the evolutionary development of the biosphere.

The biotic succession is the preserved result of the operation of the processes of organic evolution. Contributions from molecular biology and cladistics make it clear that the branching processes in evolution, operating over time, have produced all the diversity preserved in the fossil record. The current diversity of life is simply the product of its three and a half billion year history.

Type
Teaching Evolution Convincingly and with Clarity
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 5: The Evolution-Creation Controversy II: Perspectives on Science, Religion, and Geological Education , October 1999 , pp. 23 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Algeo, T. J. and Scheckler, S. E. 1998. Terrestrial-marine teleconnections in the Devonian: links between the evolution of land plants, weathering processes, and marine anoxic events. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London), B: Biological Sciences, 353:113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1999. Energetics in the global marine fauna: a connection between terrestrial diversification and change in the marine biosphere. Geobios, 32:2:1–15.Google Scholar
Banner, P. T. and Lowry, F. M. D. 1985. The stratigraphical record of planktonic foraminifera and its evolutionary implications, p. 117–130. In Cope, J. C. W. and Skelton, P. W. (eds.), Evolutionary Case Histories From the Fossil Record. The Palaeontological Association, Special Papers in Palaeontology No. 33.Google Scholar
Berry, W. B. N. 1987. Growth of a Prehistoric Time Scale. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, California, 202 p.Google Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. and Bretsky, S. S. 1975. Succession and repetition of Late Ordovician fossil assemblages from the Nicolet River Valley, Quebec. Paleobiology, 1:225–237.Google Scholar
Bretsky, S. S. and Bretsky, P. W. 1977. Morphological variability and change in the palaeotaxodont bivalve mollusk Nuculites planulatus (Upper Ordovician of Quebec). Journal of Paleontology, 51:256–271.Google Scholar
Chiappe, L. 1995. The first 85 million years of avian evolution. Nature, 378:349–355.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. 1995. History of Life. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, Massachusetts, 462 p.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1812. Recherches sur les Ossements Fossiles de Quadrupedes. Part is available in English translation, p. 188–193. In Mather, K. F. and Mason, S. L. (eds.). 1964. A Source Book in Geology. Hafner Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. and Brongiart, A. 1808 and 1811 (with map). Essai sur la geographie mineralogique des environs de Paris. Part is available in English translation, p. 194–200. In Mather, K. F. and Mason, S. L. (eds.). 1964. A Source Book in Geology. Hafner Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London, 490 p.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. and Wallace, A. R. 1858. On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zool.), 3:45–62.Google Scholar
Dommergues, J.-L. 1990. Ammonoids, p. 162–187. In McNamara, K. J. (ed.), Evolutionary Trends. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. and Paul, C. R. C. (eds.). 1998. The Adequacy of the Fossil Record. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 312 p.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1971. The allopatric model and phylogeny in Paleozoic invertebrates. Evolution, 25:156–167.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, p. 82–115. In Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology.' Freeman, Cooper and Comapany, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. 1997. Life Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 346 p.Google Scholar
Geary, D. H. 1990. Patterns of evolutionary tempo and mode in the radiation of Melanopsis (Gastropoda; Melanopsidae). Paleobiology, 16:492–511.Google Scholar
Geary, D. H. 1992. An unusual pattern of divergence between two fossil gastropods: ecophenotypy, dimorphism, or hybridization? Paleobiology, 18:93–109.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1976. Paleontology and phylogeny: Patterns of evolution at the species level in Early Tertiary mammals. American Journal of Science, 276:1–28.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (Editor). 1993. The Book of Life. W. W. Norton and Company, New York, 256 p.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. 1994. Proterozoic carbonaceous compressions (“metaphytes” and “worms”), p. 342–357. In Bengston, S. (ed.), Early Life on Earth. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. J., Narbonne, G. M., and Aitken, J. D. 1990. Ediacaran remains from intertillite beds in northwestern Canada. Geology, 18:1199–1202.Google Scholar
Janvier, P. 1996. Early Vertebrates. Oxford University Press, New York, 393 p.Google Scholar
Lazarus, D. 1986. Tempo and mode of morphologic evolution near the origin of the radiolarian lineage Pterocanium prismatium. Paleobiology, 12:175–189.Google Scholar
Luo, Z. 1994. Sister-group relationships of mammals and transformations of diagnostic mammalian characters, p.98–128. In Fraser, N. C. and Sues, H.-D. (eds.), In the Shadow of the Dinosaurs. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. 1833. Principles of Geology, Volume 3. John Murray, London, p. i–xxxii, 5 pl., 1–398, Appendix 1–109.Google Scholar
Malmgren, B. J., Berggren, W. A., and Lohmann, G. P. 1983. Evidence for punctuated gradualism in the Late Neogene Globotruncana tumida lineage of planktonic foraminifera. Paleobiology 9:377–389.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997. A new look at age and area: the geographic and environmental expansion of genera during the Ordovician radiation. Paleobiology, 23:410–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. I. and Mao, S. 1998. Scales of diversification and the Ordovician radiation, p. 288–310. In McKinney, M. L. and Drake, J. A. (eds.), Biodiversity Dynamics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Nehm, R. H. and Geary, D. H. 1994. A gradual morphologic transition during a rapid speciation event in marginellid gastropods (Neogene: Dominican Republic). Journal of Paleontology, 68:787–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, V. and Gautam, R. 1999; Seilacher, A., Bose, P. K., Pfluger, F. 1999. Technical comment. Evaluating evidence of ancient animals. Science, apparently only available online at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/284/5418/1235a.Google Scholar
Retallack, G. J. 1990. Soils of the Past. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Rye, R. and Holland, H. D. 1998. Paleosols and the evolution of atmospheric oxygen: a critical review. American Journal of Science, 298:621–672.Google Scholar
Schopf, J. W. 1993. Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New evidence of the antiquity of life. Science, 260:640–646.Google Scholar
Shrock, R. R. 1948. Sequence in Layered Rocks. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Smith, W. 1815. A Map of the Strata of England and Wales with a part of Scotland, and Memoir to the Map and Delineation of the Straat of England and Wales with a part of Scotland. Map and 51 p. booklet.Google Scholar
Sorhannus, U., Fenster, E. J., Burckle, L. H., and Hoffman, A. 1988. Cladogenetic and anagenetic changes in the morphology of Rhizosolenia preaebergonii Mukhina. Historical Biology 1:185–205.Google Scholar
Steno, N. 1669. Nicollai Stenonis de Solido intra Solidum naturaliter contento dissertationis prodromus. Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
Xiao, S., Zhang, Y., and Knoll, A. H. 1998. Three-dimensional preservation of algae and animal embryos in a Neoproterozoic phosphorite. Nature, 391:553–558.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M. 1966. The Silurian brachiopod Eocoelia hemisphaerica (J. de C. Sowerby) and related species. Palaeontology, 9:523–543.Google Scholar