Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:21:08.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fossil Record of Parasitism on Marine Invertebrates with Special Emphasis on the Platyceratid-Crinoid Interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Tomasz K. Baumiller  and
Forest J. Gahn
Tomasz K. Baumiller
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079 USA
Forest J. Gahn
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079 USA
Get access

Abstract

The paleontological literature on marine invertebrates is rich in supposed examples of parasitism and our tabulation shows a nearly even distribution of reported cases through the post-Cambrian Phanerozoic. Slightly lower frequencies characterize the Triassic and Jurassic and higher frequencies the Cretaceous and Tertiary, and the pattern roughly mirrors Sepkoski's (1984) marine diversity curve. The total number of parasitic associations for any geologic period rarely exceeds a dozen, yet few of the reported examples provide explicit criteria distinguishing parasitism from predation, commensalism, or mutualism. We evaluated the published examples using the following criteria: (1) evidence of a long-term relationship between two organisms, (2) benefit of interaction to supposed parasite, and (3) detriment of interaction to the host We found that only in exceptional cases were these criteria fulfilled. One example that provides much information on parasitic interactions involves platyceratids and crinoids and we summarize the evidence for the parasitic interaction between these two groups of organisms.

Type
Section II: Patterns
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 8: The Fossil Record of Predation , October 2002 , pp. 195 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alekseev, A. S., and Endelman, L. G. 1989. Association of ectoparasitic gastropods with Upper Cretaceous echinoid Galerites, p. 165–174. In Anonymous (ed.), Fossil and Recent Echinoderm Researches. Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Tallin.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Gurrola, R. A. 1979. Two boring organisms in a Lower Mississippian community of southern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 53:335–344.Google Scholar
Austin, T., and Austin, T. 1843–1846. Monograph on Recent and Fossil Crinoidea. Bristol and London, 128 p.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E. 1990. Conularid pearls, p. 68–70. In Boucout, A. J., Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and coevolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 725 p.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C., Brett, C. E., and Tomlinson, J. T. 1990. Host-specific acrothoracid barnacles on Middle Devonian platyceratid gastropods. Historical Biology, 4:221–244.Google Scholar
Barry, C., Hatch, W., and Klimley, S. 1972. Commensalism and parasitism of shell-borers from the Cretaceous Navesink Formation of New Jersey. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 4(1):7–8.Google Scholar
Bates, D. E. B., and Loydell, D. K. 2000. Parasitism on graptoloid graptolites. Palaeontology, 43(6):1143–1151.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1990. Non-predatory drilling of Mississippian crinoids by platyceratid gastropods. Palaeontology, 33:743–748.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1993. Boreholes in Devonian blastoids and their implications for boring by platyceratids. Lethaia, 26:41–47.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1996. Boreholes in Middle Devonian blastoid Heteroschisma and their implications for gastropod drilling. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 123:343–351.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 2001. Cost-Benefit analysis as a guide to the ecology of drilling platyceratids. Paleobios, 21:29.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 2002. Multi-snail infestation of Devonian crinoids and the nature of platyceratid-crinoid interactions. Acta Palaentologica Polonica, 47(1):132–139.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1995. Borings in Devonian and Mississippian blastoids (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 69:1084–1089.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., Leighton, L. R., and Thompson, D. L. 1999. Boreholes in Mississippian spiriferide brachiopods and their implications for Paleozoic drilling. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 147:283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1990. Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and coevolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 725 p.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J., and McCutcheon, S. R. 1986. Ziegler's blisters in Pentameroides from a Lower Silurian locality in the northeastern part of the Mascarene-Nerepis Belt, southern New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 23:1437–1442.Google Scholar
Bowsher, A. L. 1955. Origin and adaptation of platyceratid gastropods. University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions, Mollusca, 5:1–11.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1978. Host-specific pit-forming epizoans on Silurian crinoids. Lethaia, 11:217–232.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1985. Tremichnus: a new ichnogenus of circular-parabolic pits in fossil echinoderms. Journal of Paleontology, 59:625–635.Google Scholar
Buehler, E. J. 1969. Cylindrical borings in Devonian shales. Journal of Paleontology, 43:1291.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R., and Yochelson, E. L. 1968. Recent gastropod boreholes and Ordovician cylindrical borings. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 593-B:1–26.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1975. A commensal relationship between a small filter-feeding organism and Australian Devonian brachiopods. Paleobiology, 1:371–378 Google Scholar
Clarke, G. L. 1954. Elements of Ecology. John Wiley, New York, 534 p.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1908. The beginnings of dependent life. Bulletin of the New York State Museum, 121:1–28.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1921. Organic dependence and disease: Their origin and significance. Yale University Press, New Haven, 113 p.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1981. Parasites and the fossil record. Parasitology, 82:489–509.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Bengston, S. 1994. Cambrian predators: Possible evidence from boreholes. Journal of Paleontology, 68(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Elias, M. K. 1966. Living and fossil algae and fungi, formerly known as structural parts of marine bryozoans. The Paleobotanist, 14:5–18.Google Scholar
Fisher, P. H. 1962. Perforation de fossiles pre-tertiaries attribuees à des gastéropodes predateurs. Journal de Conchyliologie, 102:68–78.Google Scholar
Franzen, C. 1974. Epizoans on Silurian-Devonian crinoids. Lethaia, 7:287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahn, F. J., and Baumiller, T. K. 2001. Testing evolutionary escalation between crinoids and platyceratid gastropods and phylogenetic analysis of the Compsocrinina (Crinoidea: Monobathrida). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 33(6):247.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1969. Decapoda, p. R400–R533. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4(2). University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y. 1981. Parasitism on Ordovician chitinozoa. Lethaia, 14(2):135–142.Google Scholar
Hayami, I., and Kanie, Y. 1980. Mode of life of a giant capulid gastropod from the Upper Cretaceous of Saghalien and Japan. Palaeontology, 23(3):689–698.Google Scholar
Herdman, W. A. 1906. Report to the government of Ceylon on the pearl oyster fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar, Part V. Royal Society of London, London, 452 p.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1885. Description of a new species of crinoids with articulated spines. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5th Series, 15:157–173.Google Scholar
Holland, N. D., Leonard, A. B., And Meyer, D. L. 1991. Digestive mechanics and gluttonous feeding in the feather star Oligometra serripinna (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 111:113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S. M. 1984. Paleoecology and paleontology of the Indian Springs shale member, Big Clifty Formation (Middle Chesterian) in south-central Indiana. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. R. 1888a. On the attachment of Platyceras to Paleocrinoids, and its effects in modifying the form of the shell. American Philosophical Society Proceedings, Transactions, 25:231–243.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. R. 1888b. The sedentary habits of Platyceras. American Journal of Science, 36:269–272.Google Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1981. A bored Cretaceous echinoid. Journal of Paleontology, 55:656–659 Google Scholar
Kluessendorf, J. 1983. Observations on the commensalism of Silurian platyceratid gastropods and stalked echinoderms. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 71:48–55.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Simões, M. G., Torello, F. F., Mello, L. H. C., and Ghilardi, R. P. 2000. Drill holes in shells of Permian benthic invertebrates. Journal of Paleontology, 74(3):532–543.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1978. Mutualistic relations of fossil crinoids, p. T345–T347. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1984. Predation and survival among inadunate crinoids. Paleobiology, 10:453–458.Google Scholar
Leighton, L. R. 2001. New example of Devonian predatory boreholes and the influence of brachiopod spines on predator success. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, and Palaeoecology, 165:53–69.Google Scholar
Levin, H. L., and Fay, R. O. 1964. Relationship between Diploblastus kirkwoodensis and Platyceras (Platyceras). Oklahoma Geology Notes, 24:22–29.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. I., and Biernat, G. 1970. The probable affinities of the trace fossil Diorygma atrypophilis. Lethaia, 3:163–172.Google Scholar
Madsen, F. J., and Wolff, T. 1965. Evidence of the occurrence of Ascothoracica (parasitic cirriped) in upper Cretaceous. Dansk Geologisk Forening, Meddelelser, 15:556–558.Google Scholar
Marouf, A. M. 1999. Parasitism, abnormal growth and predation on Cretaceous echinoids from Egypt. Revue de Paleobiologie, 18(1):69–83.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1866. Radiata, Echinodermata, Crinoidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, (1866):251–275.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H. 1868. Geology and Palaeontology, pt 2, Palaeontology of Illinois. Illinois Geologic Survey, 3:289–565.Google Scholar
Mercier, J. 1937. Zoothylacies d'échinide fossiles provoquées par un crustace: Castexia douvillei nov. gen., nov. sp. Bulletin de la Societe Géologique de France, Série 5, 6:149–154.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Ausich, W. I. 1983. Biotic interactions among Recent and fossil crinoids, p. 377–427. In Tevesz, M. F. S. and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum, New York. Owen, R. 1862. Report of a geological reconnaissance of Indiana made during the years 1859 and 1860. Indianapolis, 368 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. J., and Wilson, M. A. 1988. Parasitism of Ordovician bryozoans and the origin of pseudoborings. Palaeontology, 31(4):939–949.Google Scholar
Pernet, B., and Kohn, A. J. 1998. Size-related obligate and facultative parasitism in the marine gastropod Trichotropis cancellata. Biological Bulletin, 195:349–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, J. 1973. Interspecific relationships among fossil species. Australian Natural History, 17(10):338–343.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J., and Gutschick, R. C. 1977. Barnacle borings in live and dead hosts from the Louisiana Limestone (Fammenian) of Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 51:718–724.Google Scholar
Rollins, H. B., and Brezinski, D. K. 1988. Reinterpretation of crinoid-platyceratid interaction. Lethaia, 21:207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, J. 1952. Quelques anomalies chez Clypeaster melitensis Michelin. Bulletin de la Société geologique de France, 2:3–11.Google Scholar
Savazzi, E. 1995. Parasite-induced teratologies in the Pliocene bivalve Isognomon maxillatus. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 116(2):131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1968. Swimming habits of belemnites, recorded by boring barnacles. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 4:279–285.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity, III: Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology, 10:246–267.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1969. The fossil record of shell borings by snails. American Zoologist, 9:725–734.Google Scholar
Solovjev, A. N. 1961. Parasit Canceripustula nocens v pozdneoorskogo morskogo ezha. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 4:115–119.Google Scholar
Sutherland, S. J. E. 1994. Ludlow chitinozoans from the type area and adjacent regions. Paleontological Society Monograph, 104 p.Google Scholar
Tasnadi-Kubacska, A. 1962. Paläopathologie. G. Fischer-Verlag, Jena, 2, 269 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. N., and Osborn, J. M., 1996. The importance of fungi in shaping the paleoecosystem. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology, 90(3–4):249–262.Google Scholar
Thein, M. L., and Nitecki, M. H. 1974. Chesterian (Upper Mississippian) Gastropoda of the Illinois basin. Fieldiana Geology, 34:1–238.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. O. 1924. Echinoderms of the Iowa Devonian. Iowa Geologic Survey, Annual Reports, 29:385–552.Google Scholar
Thorsong, G. 1965. A neotenous dwarf-form of Capulus ungaricus (L.) (Gastropoda, prosobranchia) commensalistic on Turritella communis Risso. Ophelia, 2(1):175–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: Evidence from snails, predators, and grazers. Paleobiology, 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1980. Drilling predation of bivalves in Guam: Some paleontological implications. Malacologia, 19:329–334.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and escalation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 527 p.Google Scholar
Voight, E. 1955. Artspezifischer parachorismus (?) von serpuliden in kreidebryo. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 29(1–2):8–20.Google Scholar
Welch, J. R. 1976. Phosphannulus on Paleozoic crinoid stems. Journal of Paleontology, 50:218–255.Google Scholar
Wood, G. D. 1980. Coprolite, urolite, and “vomite.” Maledicta, 4:109–115.Google Scholar
Yandell, L.P., and Shumard, B. F. 1847. Contributions to the geology of Kentucky. Prentice and Weissinger, Louisville, 36 p.Google Scholar