Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:53:29.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Aerodynamic Aspects of Rotor Blade Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2023

H B Squire*
Affiliation:
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In studying the aerodynamics of rotor blades we are often uncertain how far we may apply quantitatively the data obtained from wind tunnel tests of aerofoils Of course, the rotor blade behaves qualitatively like an aerofoil, but I sometimes feel doubtful about calculations of the effect of detailed changes in blade design, say for example, the effect of taper on performance, and wish to stress the desirability of wind tunnel tests by which some at least of these questions could be settled more easily than by flight tests

I have found in preparing this lecture that covering the whole field would be impracticable I intend to concentrate mainly on the compressibility problem which, closely associated with stalling, seems to me to be the principal aerodynamic problem facing the blade designer today

Type
Morning Session (Papers)
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1951

Footnotes

*

ACKNOWLEDGMENT This paper is published by permission of the Director of the National Physical Laboratory Crown copyright reserved

References

List of References

1 Gustafson, and Myers, Stalling of helicopter blades N A C A Tech Note No 1083 (1946)Google Scholar
2 Gessow, A Effect of rotor-blade twist and plan-form taper on helicopter hovering performance N A C A Tech Note No 1542 (1948)Google Scholar
3 Gessow, A Flight investigation of effects of rotor-blade twist on helicopter performance in the high-speed and vertical-autorotative-descent conditions N A C A Tech Note No 1666 (1948)Google Scholar
4 Gothert, German high speed tunnel results R A E Tech Note No Aero 1684 (1945)Google Scholar
5 Hills, R and Gamble, H RAE Tech Note No Aero 1926 (1947)Google Scholar
6 Carpenter, P J Effects of compressibility on the performance of two full-scale helicopter rotors N A C A Tech Note No 2277 (1951)Google Scholar
7 Graham, Nitzberg and Olson, A systematic investigation of pressure distributions at high speeds over five representative N A C A low drag and conventional aerofoil sections N A C A Report No 832 (1945)Google Scholar
8 Beavan, Sargent and Burrows, Measurements of maximum lift on 19 aerofoil sections at high Mach number ARC Report No 11,084 (1947)Google Scholar
9 Spreiter, and Steffen, Effect of Mach and Reynolds numbers on maximum lift coefficient N A C A Tech Note 1044 (1946)Google Scholar
10 Furlong, and Fitzpatrick, Effects of Mach number and Reynolds number on the maximum lift coefficient of a wing of N A C A 230 series aerofoil section N A C A Tech Note No 1299 (1947)Google Scholar
11 Schaefer, Loftin and Horton, Two-dimensional investigation of five related aerofoil sections designed for rotating-wing aircraft N A C A Tech Note No 1922 (1949)Google Scholar
12 Abbott, and Von Doenhoff, Theory of wing sections (McGraw Hill, 1949)Google Scholar
13 Gregory, and Walker, The effect on transition of isolated surface excrescences in the boundary layer ARC Report No 13,436 (1950)Google Scholar
14 Dingeldein, and Schaefer, Static thrust tests of six rotor blade designs on a helicopter in the Langley Full-scale Tunnel N A C A A R R No L5F25b (ARC Report No 10,077)Google Scholar