Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:23:20.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating the confining compressibility of STF at high deformation rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2012

Weifeng Jiang
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Xinglong Gong*
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Yulei Xu
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Shouhu Xuan
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Wanquan Jiang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, USTC, Hefei 230026, P.R. China
Wei Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, USTC, Hefei 230026, P.R. China
Xiaofeng Li
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Lijun Qin
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei 230027, P.R. China
*
Get access

Abstract

The split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) was used to study the compressibility of shear thickening fluid (STF) at high deformation rate. In this study, a steel bulk was introduced into the SHPB system to confine and load the STF. A series of STFs with different particle types (SiO2 and PSt-EA) and volume fractions (63 vol.% and 65 vol.%) were tested and the results were compared. The reliability of the results was proved by repeating the tests and the force balance in suspension. The bulk modulus was used to evaluate the compressibility of STF, which indicated that the SiO2-based STF exhibited a larger compressibility than the PSt-EA-based STF. It was found that the bulk modulus increases with increasing of the strain rate and the volume fraction shows little effect on the bulk modulus. The structure-dependent mechanical property was analyzed and the loading effect of bulk modulus was considered to be originated from the interparticle clustering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, H.A., J. Rheol. 33, 329 (1989)CrossRef
Chellamuthu, M., Arndt, E.M., Rothstein, J.P., Soft Matt. 5, 2117 (2009)CrossRef
Lim, A.S., Lopatnikov, S.L., Wagner, N.J., Gillespie, J.W., Rheol. Acta 49, 879 (2010)CrossRef
Zhang, X.Z., Li, W.H., Gong, X.L., Smart Mater. Struct. 17, 035027 (2008)CrossRef
Lee, Y.S., Wetzel, E.D., Wagne, N.J., J. Mater. Sci. 38, 2825 (2003)CrossRef
Duan, Y., Keefe, M., Bogetti, T.A., Cheeseman, B.A., Compos. Struct. 68, 331 (2005)CrossRef
Kang, T.J., Hong, K.H., Yoo, M.R., Fiber. Polym. 11, 719 (2010)CrossRef
Fischer, C., Braun, S.A., Bourban, P.-E., Michaud, V., Plummer, C.J.G., Manson, J.-A.E., Smart Mater. Struct. 15, 1467 (2006)CrossRef
Robinovitch, S.N., Hayes, W.C., McMahon, T.A., Biomech, J., Eng. Trans. ASME 117, 409 (1995)
Stickel, J.J., Powell, R.L., Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 129 (2005)CrossRef
Hoffman, R.L., Trans. Soc. Rheol. 16, 155 (1972)CrossRef
Hoffman, R.L., J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 46, 491 (1974)CrossRef
Brady, J.F., Bossis, G., J. Fluid Mech. 155, 105 (1985)CrossRef
Laun, H.M., Bung, R., Hess, S., Loose, W., Hess, O., Hahn, K., Hadicke, E., Hingmann, R., Schmidt, F., Lindner, P., J. Rheol. 36, 743 (1992)CrossRef
Bender, J., Wagner, N.J., J. Rheol. 40, 899 (1996)CrossRef
Maranzano, B.J., Wagner, N.J., J. Chem. Phys. 117, 10291 (2002)CrossRef
Wagner, N.J., Brady, J.F., Phys. Today 62, 27 (2009)CrossRef
Cheng, X., McCoy, J.H., Israelachvili, J.N., Cohen, I., Science 333, 1276 (2011)CrossRef
Lee, Y.S., Wagner, N.J., Rheol. Acta 42, 199 (2003)
Fischer, C., Plummer, C.J.G., Michaud, V., Bourban, P.E., Manson, J.A.E., Rheol. Acta 46, 1099 (2007)CrossRef
Deshpande, V.S., Fleck, N.A., Int. J. Impact Eng. 24, 277 (2000)CrossRef
Lok, T.S., Zhao, P.J., J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 16, 54 (2004)CrossRef
Bo, C., Balzer, J., Brown, K.A., Walley, S.M., Proud, W.G., Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 31201 (2011)CrossRef
Ogawa, K., J. Phys. IV 110, 435 (2003)
Lim, A.S., Lopatnikov, S.L., Gillespie, J.W., Polym. Test 28, 891 (2009)CrossRef
Lim, A.S., Lopatnikoy, S.L., Wagner, N.J., Gillespie, J.W., J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 166, 680 (2011)CrossRef
Ahrstrom, B.O., Lindqvist, S., Hoglund, E., Sundin, K.G., Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J. Journal of Engineering Tribology 216, 63 (2002)CrossRef
Lomakin, E.V., Mossakovsky, P.A., Bragov, A.M., Lomunov, A.K., Konstantinov, A.Y., Kolotnikov, M.E., Antonov, F.K., Vakshtein, M.S., Arch. Appl. Mech. 81, 2007 (2011)CrossRef
Song, B., Chen, W., Exp. Mech. 44, 300 (2004)CrossRef
Ravichandran, G., Subhash, G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 263 (1994)CrossRef
Frew, D.J., Forrestal, M.J., Chen, W., Exp. Mech. 42, 93 (2002)CrossRef
Frew, D.J., Forrestal, M.J., Chen, W., Exp. Mech. 45, 186 (2005)CrossRef
Petel, O.E., Higgins, A.J., J. Appl. Phys. 108, 114918 (2010)CrossRef
Meyers, M.A., Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 1st edn. (Wiley, New York, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar