Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:27:34.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of DC and AC electric field effect on Pisum sativum seeds growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Bahar Mahmood ,
Sojoodi Jaleh  and
Yasaie Yasaman
Bahar Mahmood*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Plasma Physics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Campus, Simon Bolivar Street, Ashrafi Esfehani Avenue, Tehran, Iran Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Iran
Sojoodi Jaleh
Affiliation:
Faculty of Plasma Physics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Campus, Simon Bolivar Street, Ashrafi Esfehani Avenue, Tehran, Iran
Yasaie Yasaman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Plasma Physics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Campus, Simon Bolivar Street, Ashrafi Esfehani Avenue, Tehran, Iran
*
ae-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this research the effect of electric field on two groups of wet and dry Pisum sativum seeds growth was studied. To generate the required electric field a parallel-plate capacitor with round copper plates of 30 cm diameter was used. The experiments were performed once in fixed exposure duration of 8 min in variable DC electric field of 0.25–1.5 kV/m. The other experiments were performed in variable fields of 50–125 kV/m in fixed exposure duration of 8 min, in two groups of AC and DC electric fields. The experiments were repeated three times. In each experiment 10 seeds were used and there was a sham exposed group for comparison, too. After application of electric field, the seeds were kept for six days in the same growth chamber with the temperature of 25 ± 1 °C and 12 h light/12 h darkness. On the 6th day length of stems and height of roots were measured. After doing statistical analysis, in low intensities of DC electric field, the highest significant increase of mean growth (The average of stem length and the height of roots) was seen in 1.5 kV/m in wet seeds. In high intensities of DC and AC electric fields, the highest significant increase of mean growth was seen in AC electric field of 100 kV/m in wet seeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
The European Physical Journal - Applied Physics , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , July 2014 , 11201
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Moon, J.D., Chung, H.S., J. Eelectrostat. 48, 103 (2000)CrossRef
Volkov, A.G., Ranatunga, D.R., Plant Signal Behav. 1, 105 (2006)CrossRef
Hanafy, M.S., Husien, G., Abdelmo’ty, E., Phys. Alive 13, 41 (2005)
Guido, E., Quantum Potential (Pennsylvania, 2011), www.Quantum-Potential.com Google Scholar
Morar, R., Munteanu, R., Simion, E., Munteanu, I., Dascalescu, L., IEEE 35, 208 (2002)
Kiatgamjorn, P., Khan-ngern, W., Nitta, S., in Proceeding of Asia-Pacific Conference on the Environment Electromagnetic(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, China, 2003), pp. 142–147
Wang, G., Haung, J., Gao, W., Lu, J., Li, J., Liao, R., Jaleel, C.A., J. Eelectrostat. 67, 759 (2005)CrossRef
Hanafy, M.S., Mohamed, H.A., Abd El-Hady, E.A., Romanian J. Biophys. 16, 253 (2006)
Rotcharoen, T., Kerdonfag, P., Khan-ngern, W., in Proceeding of Asia-Pacific Conference on Electromagnetic Fields, Research, Health Effects and Standard Harmonization, Thailand, 2004
Tenford, T.S., Kaune, W.H., Health Phys. 52, 585 (1987)CrossRef
Saunders, R.D., Sienkiewicz, Z.K., Kowalczuk, C.J., J. Biol. Prot. London 37, 11 (1991)
Summerfield, R., in Grain Legume Crops, edited by Roberts, E.H., 1st edn (Sheridan House Inc., Florida, 1985)Google Scholar
Becker, J.F., Electricity and Magnetism (San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, 2009)Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, D.J. et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 272, 643 (2000)CrossRef
Ly, M., Poole, L.A., Warren, Wound Practice and Research 3, 138 (2008)
Halgamuge, M.N., Abeyrathne, C.D., Environ. Eng. Sci. 28, 1 (2011)CrossRef
Dimitrov, D.S., in Electroporation and Electrocution of Membranes, edited by Lipowsky, R., Sackmann, E. (Elsevier Science, Netherland, 1995)Google Scholar
Nickoloff, J.A., Plant Cell Electroporation & Electrofusion Protocols (Humana Press Inc., United States, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahar, M., Yasaei, Y., Sojoodi, J., Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 21201 (2013)CrossRef
Blank, M., Mechanism of Biological Intractions with Electric and Magnetic Fields in 2nd World Congress Electricity & Magnetism in Biology & Medicine, 1997 Google Scholar
Balcavage, W.X., Alvager, T., Swez, J., Goff, C.W., Fox, M.T., Abdullyava, S., King, M.W., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 222, 374 (1996)CrossRef
Gelettyuk, V.I., Kazachoneko, V.N., Chemevis, N.K., Fesenko, E.E., FEBS Lett. 359, 85 (1995)CrossRef
Adey, W.R., in Membrane Transport and Information Storage, edited by Aloia, R.C., Curtain, C.C., Gordon, L.M. (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1990)Google Scholar
Adey, W.R., in Extremely low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields: The Question of Cancer, edited by Wilson, B.W., Stevens, R.G., Anderson, L.E. (Battelle Press, Columbus, 1990)Google Scholar
Tenforde, T.S., in Biological Effects of Magnetic and Electromagnetic Field, edited by Ueno, S. (Plenum Press, New York, 1996)Google Scholar
Bawin, S.M., Adey, W.R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 73, 1999 (1976)CrossRef
Blackman, C.F., Benane, S.G., Kinney, L.S., House, D.E., Radiat. Res. 92, 510 (1982)CrossRef
Barnes, F.S., in Biological Effects of Magnetics and Electromagnetic Fields, edited by Ueno, S. (PlenumPress, New York, 1996)Google Scholar