Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:06:47.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling the stress enhancement of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited silicon nitride films by UV post treatment – impact of the film density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2008

P. Morin*
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 850 rue Jean Monnet, 38926 Crolles Cedex, France
D. Benoit
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 850 rue Jean Monnet, 38926 Crolles Cedex, France
J. Metz
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics, 850 rue Jean Monnet, 38926 Crolles Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposited (PECVD) tensile nitride liners have been introduced in the 90 nm CMOS technology node to generate mechanical strain within the transistor silicon channel. With strain, because of the silicon piezoresistance effect, the electron mobility is enhanced within the silicon channel, so the nMOS transistor performance. Since that time, significant work has been carried out to develop silicon nitride films with enhanced tensile stress values to increase the gain provided by these process induced stressors along the introduction of the new technologies. For the 45 nm node, an additional UV post treatment has been introduced to achieve highly tensile residual stress. This study determines the relevant as deposited PECVD nitride film properties that modulate the final stress achievable after UV cure. Thanks to a simple stress model, it is demonstrated that as deposited nitride films must present a nitrogen rich composition and an intrinsic low density to become highly tensile after post UV treatment. With these design rules, nitride films with final stress of 1.6 GPa have been synthesized.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

S. Ito, H. Namba, K. Yamaguchi, T. Hirata, K. Ando, S. Koyama, S. Kuroki, N. Ikezawa, T. Suzuki, T. Saitoh, T. Horiuchi, in Technical Digest of the International Electron Device Meeting, IEEE (2000)
P. Morin, E. Martinez, F. Wacquant, J. Regolini, in Proceedings of the Material Research Symposium, San Francisco, USA (2005)
R.H. Meyers, D.C. Montgomery, in Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995)
Landford, W.A., Rand, M.J., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 4 (1978)
P. Morin, C. Rossato, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Materials for Microelectronics and Nanoengineering, Southampton, UK, 2004
Yin, Z., Smith, Y., Phys. Rev. B 42, 3658 (1990) CrossRef
Temple-Boyer, P., Rossi, C., Saint-Etienne, E., Scheid, E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 4 (1998) CrossRef
Habermehl, S., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 9 (1998) CrossRef
Maeda, K., Umezu, I., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 5 (1991) CrossRef
Hasegawaa, S., Amano, Y., Inokuma, T., Kurata, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3 (1994)
Hughey, M.P., Cook, R.F., Thin Solid Films 460, 7 (2004) CrossRef
Miyagawa, Y., Murata, T., Nishida, Y., Nakai, T., Uedono, A., Hattori, N., Matsuura, M., Yoneda, M., Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 46, 1984 (2007) CrossRef
Boehme, C., Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19, 2622 (2001) CrossRef
Benoit, D., Regolini, J., Morin, P., Microelectron. Eng. 84, 2169 (2007) CrossRef
Regolini, J.L., Benoit, D., Morin, P., Microelectron. Reliab. 47, 739 (2007) CrossRef