Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:26:39.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vivo dosimetry for head and neck carcinoma: determination of target absorbed dose from entrance and exit absorbed dose measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2011

L. Farhat*
Affiliation:
Service de radiothérapie carcinologique, CHU Habib-Bourguiba, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
M. Besbes
Affiliation:
Service de radiothérapie carcinologique, Institut Salah-Azaiz, Boulevard du 9-avril-Bab-Saadoun, 1006 Tunis, Tunisia
A. Bridier
Affiliation:
Service de radiophysique, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 39 rue Camille-Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France
J. Daoud
Affiliation:
Service de radiothérapie carcinologique, CHU Habib-Bourguiba, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
Get access

Abstract

The aims of this work were to measure the entrance and exit dose for patient treated for head and neck tumors. The target absorbed dose was determined from the exit and entrance dose measurement.Twenty patients were evaluated. The results were compared to the calculated values and the midline dose was determinate and compared with the prescribed dose. 80 entrance doses and 80 exit doses measurements were performed. The average difference from expected values was 1.93% for entrance dose (SD 1.92%) and –0.34% for exit dose (SD 4.1%). The target absorbed dose differed from prescribed dose values by 2.94% (1.97%) for the results using the Noël method and 3.34% (SD: 2.29%) with the Rizzotti method.The total uncertainty budget in the measurement of the absorbed entrance and exit dose with diode, including diode reading, correction factors and diode calibration coefficient, is determined as 3.02% (1 s).Simple in vivo dose measurements are an additional safeguard against major setup errors and calculation or transcription errors that were missed during pre-treatment chart check.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

International Commission on Radiation units and Measurements, Report No. 24, 1976
International Commission on Radiation units and Measurements, Report No. 62, 1999
J. Van Dam, G. Marinello, ESTRO Booklet No. 1, 1994
AAPM Report 87, Report of task group 62 of the radiation therapy committee, 2005
D. Huyken et al., Booklet No. 5, 2001
Rizzotti, A., Compri, C., Garusi, G.F., Radiother. Oncol. 3, 279 (1985) CrossRef
Leunens, G. et al., Radiother. Oncol. 19, 73 (1990) CrossRef
Heukelom, S., Lanson, J.H., Mijnheer, B.J., Radiother. Oncol. 25, 111 (1992) CrossRef
Noël, A. et al., Radiother. Oncol. 34, 144 (1995) CrossRef
International Atomic Energy Agency, Technical Report Series No. 398, 2000
Farhat, L. et al., Cancer Radiother. 14, 69 (2010) CrossRef
Grussel, E., Rikner, G., Phys. Med. Biol. 31, 527 (1986) CrossRef
Van Dam, J., Leunens, G., Dutreix, A., Radiother. Oncol. 19, 345 (1990) CrossRef
Jursinic, P.A., Med. Phys. 28, 1718 (2001) CrossRef
Besbes, M. et al., Cancer Radiother. 14, 29 (2010) CrossRef
Kappas, K., Rosenwald, J.C., Radiother. Oncol. 21, 128 (1991) CrossRef
Roué, A. et al., Radiother. Oncol. 66, S40 (2003)
Mitine, C. et al., Radiother. Oncol. 21, 201 (1991) CrossRef
Millwater, C.J., MaCleod, A.S., Thwaites, D.I., Br. J. Radiol. 71, 661 (1998) CrossRef
Fiorino, C. et al., Radiother. Oncol. 56, 85 (2000) CrossRef
Blyth, C., McLeod, A.S., Thwaites, D.I., Radiography 3, 131 (1997) CrossRef
Barker Jr, J.L.. et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 59, 960 (2004) CrossRef
Cho, B.C. et al., Med. Phys. 29, 2305 (2002) CrossRef
Senkus-Konefla, E. et al., Radiother. Oncol. 79, 304 (2006) CrossRef
Miszczyk, L., Wydmanski, J., Acta Oncol. 38, 197 (1999) CrossRef