Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:22:25.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing piezoelectric and coreless electromagnetic transformer approaches in IGBT driver

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2006

D. Vasic ,
F. Costa  and
E. Sarraute
D. Vasic*
Affiliation:
École Normale Supérieure de Cachan Systèmes et Applications des Technologies de l'Information et de l'Énergie (SATIE, UMR 8029), 61 avenue du président Wilson, 94230 Cachan, France
F. Costa
Affiliation:
École Normale Supérieure de Cachan Systèmes et Applications des Technologies de l'Information et de l'Énergie (SATIE, UMR 8029), 61 avenue du président Wilson, 94230 Cachan, France
E. Sarraute
Affiliation:
LEEI, 2 rue Charles Camichel, BP 7122, 31071 Toulouse Cedex 7, France
*
[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Gate drive circuits for power MOSFET's and IGBT's often require electrical insulation. Different methods of electrical insulation can be used: bootstrap circuits, transformers and optic couplers. It has been proved that Piezoelectric transformer (PT) exhibit suitable characteristics, good integration capability and can be used for both power and signal transfer in low power applications. However, coreless planar electromagnetic transformer (CT) technology is an alternative solution that can also give satisfactory results. This paper compares the performances and the capabilities of integration of these two kinds of transformers (i.e. PT vs. CT). The study and comparisons are carried out in a two-gate driver, functioning in a half-bridge inverter. The two devices have the same structure, similar electric characteristics (operating at resonance frequency in both cases), identical electric values and the dimensions of the two transformers are quite the same. Additionally, some EMI aspects regarding the use of these transformers will be considered.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Information
The European Physical Journal - Applied Physics , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 2006 , pp. 237 - 242
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

C.A. Rosen, Proc. Electronic Comp. Symp., 1956, pp. 205–211
O. Ohnishi, Y. Sasaki, T. Zaitsu, H. Kishe, T. Inoue, IEICE T. Fun. Electr. E77-A, 2098 (1994)
D. Vasic, F. Costa, E. Sarraute, EPE'2003 Proc., Toulouse, France, 2003, in CDROM
O. Ohnishi, H. Kishie, A. Iwamoto, Y. Sasaki, T. Zaitsu, T. Inoue, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proc., Tucson, AZ, USA, 1992, pp. 483–488
Tang, S.C., Hui, S.J., IEEE T. Power Electr. 14, 431 (1999) CrossRef
Tang, S.C., Hui, S.J., IEEE T. Power Electr. 14, 506 (1999) CrossRef
Takahashi, T., Ceram. Bul. 69, 691 (1990)
T. Zaitsu, T. Inoue, M. Shoyama, T. Ninimiya, F.C. Lee, G.C. Hua, IEEE PESC'94 Conf. Proc., Taipei, Taiwan, 1994, pp. 585–589
K.F. Lee, Principles of antenna theory (Wiley, New York, 1984), chap. 9