Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:36:50.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding Diverse Outcomes for Working-Class Learning: Conceptualising Class Consciousness as Knowledge Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Peter H. Sawchuk*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology & Equity Studies in Education, University of Toronto
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article poses the question: Why is it that work/life teaches some workers resistance and militancy while it seems to teach others despondency, withdrawal or manic careerism? The significance of this question lies in the decline of working-class community. The question is answered through an exploration of ways of conceptualising working-class learning that account for a diversity of outcomes in terms of class consciousness. The article briefly reviews key dimensions of learning theory, and then, by drawing on two empirical illustrations, it argues that the workplace must be conceptualized as an ensemble of work/life spheres. The argument confirms the prospect for a better understanding of the complex nature of work-learning relations with an emphasis on artifact mediation (i.e. the role of tools and ideas) and participatory structures (i.e. activity systems). Here the content and structural location of working-class cultural practices and dispositions (i.e. habitus) within activity systems are deemed central.

Type
Meeting Report
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007

References

Bourdieu, P. (1998) Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market, The New Press, New York.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, S. (2000) A Phenomenology of Working Class Experience, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Edwards, P., Collinson, M. (2002) ‘Empowerment and managerial labor strategies: Pragmatism regained’, Work and Occupations, 29(3), pp. 272299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, B. (2002) Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, Metropolitan, New York.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2000) ‘From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology’ in Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C. (eds.), Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 150166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, T., Farrell, L. (eds.) (in press) Educating the global workforce: Knowledge, knowledge work and knowledge workers, Kogan Page, New York.Google Scholar
Fenwick, T., Nesbit, T., Spencer, B. (eds.) (2006) Contexts of Adult Education: Canadian Perspectives, Thompson Educational Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Foley, G. (1999) Learning in Social Action: A Contribution to Understanding Informal Education, Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
Forrester, V. (1998) L’horreur économique, Fayard, Paris.Google Scholar
Frenkel, S. (2003) ‘The embedded character of workplace relations’, Work and Occupations, 30(2), pp. 135153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H., Vonèche, J. (eds.) (1977) The Essential Piaget, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Illeris, K. (2002) The Three Dimensions of Learning: Contemporary Learning Theory in the Tension Field between the Cognitive, the Emotional, and the Social, Roskilde University Press, Frederiksberg.Google Scholar
Leont’ev, A.N. (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Livingstone, D.W., Sawchuk, P. H. (2004) Hidden Knowledge: Organized Labour in the Information Age, Garamond Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1982) Phases of Capitalist Development, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867/1986) Capital (Volume I), Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
Nash, R. (2005) ‘The cognitive habitus: Its place in a realist account of inequality/difference’, British Journal of Sociology in Education, 26(5), pp. 599612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negt, O., Kluge, A. (1993) Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., Garcia, R. (1989) Psychogenesis and the History of Science, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Sawchuk, P. H. (2003) Adult Learning and Technology in Working-Class Life, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sawchuk, Peter H. (2006a) ‘“Use-value” and the re-thinking of skills, learning and the labour process’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(5), pp. 589613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawchuk, P. (2006b) ‘Activity and power: Everyday life and development of working-class groups’, in Sawchuk, P., Duarte, N., Elhammoumi, M. (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Activity: Explorations Across Education, Work and the Everyday, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 238267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staff, (2006) ‘The Forgotten Underclass’, The Economist, October 28th, pp. 6566.Google Scholar
Swift, J. (1995) Wheel of Fortune: Work and Life in the Age of Fall Expectations, Between the Lines, Toronto.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1987) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (Volume 1): Problems of General Psychology, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Warhurst, C., Thompson, P. (2006) ‘Mapping knowledge in work: Proxies or practices?’, Work, Employment and Society, 20(4), pp. 787800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar