Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T11:50:13.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of belief in the case for austerity policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Sheila C Dow
Sheila C Dow*
Affiliation:
University of Stirling, UK
*
Sheila C Dow, Division of Economics, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mainstream economists give the misleading impression that their argument for austerity is purely technical and indeed the most ‘scientific’. The argument developed here is that their reasoning is not, any more than that of their heterodox critics, independent of ideology, power and ethics. The widespread belief in austerity policies as scientifically justified has prevented arguments against austerity gaining more traction; issues of ideology, power and ethics need to be brought to the fore as part of the arguments on both sides. In other words, awareness of the epistemological issues arising from an open-system ontology is critical to understanding the crisis and the policy response, and therefore to challenging that understanding and encouraging a radical policy shift. The critique of austerity policies would therefore be strengthened by a critique of the mainstream’s rhetorical (mis)representation of economic theorising.

Keywords

B4E1E62Belieffiscal austerityscience
Type
Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, L, Mankiw, NG (1996) What do budget deficits do? NBER working paper no. 5263. Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Blaug, M (1980) The Methodology of Economics, or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, M (2013) Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boumans, M, Davis, JB (2010) Economic Methodology: Understanding Economics as a Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boyer, R (2012) The four fallacies of contemporary austerity policies: the lost Keynesian legacy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36(1): 283–312.Google Scholar
Buchanan, M (2013) Forecast: What Physics, Meteorology and the Natural Sciences Can Teach Us about Economics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Callinicos, A (2012) Contradictions of austerity. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36(1): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chick, V (1995) ‘Order out of chaos’ in economics. In: Dow, S, Hillard, J (eds) Keynes, Knowledge and Uncertainty. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
Chick, V, Pettifor, A (2010) The Economic Consequences of Mr Osborne. Fiscal Consolidation: Lessons from a Century of UK Macroeconomic Statistics. London: PRIME Publications.Google Scholar
Colander, D (2002) The lost art of economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(3): 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P (2012) Is economics a science? Should economics be rigorous? Real-world Economics Review 59. Available at: http://econ.bus.utk.edu/documents/davidsonpapers/realworld%20econrview(2).pdf (accessed 10 October 2014).Google Scholar
Dow, SC ([1995] 2012) Uncertainty about uncertainty. In: Dow, S, Hillard, J (eds) Keynes, Knowledge and Uncertainty. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 117–27 (Reprinted in Dow S Foundations for New Economic Thinking: A Collection of Essays. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.72–82).Google Scholar
Dow, SC (2002) Economic Methodology: An Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, SC (2013) ‘Mark Blaug on Formalism and Reality: the case of behavioural economics’, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 6(3): 26–43. http://ejpe.org/pdf/6-3-art-2.pdf Google Scholar
Gabor, D (2010) Central Banking and Financialization. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hands, DW (2001) Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herndon, T, Ash, M, Pollin, R (2014) Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38(2): 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D ([1739–1740] 1978) A Treatise of Human Nature (ed Selby-Bigge, KA, Nedditch, PH). 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kayatekin, SA (2014) The relation of morality to political economy in Hume. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38(3): 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, JM (1921) A Treatise on Probability (Reprinted in Collected Writings, 1973). vol. VIII. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Keynes, JM ([1934] 1973) The General Theory and After. Part I: Preparation: Collected Writings. vol. XIII. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Konzelmann, SJ (2014) The political economics of austerity. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38(4): 701–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, M (2012) After the crisis: Perspectives for post-Keynesian economics. In: Lee, F, Lavoie, M (eds) In Defense of Post-Keynesian Economics and Heterodox Economics: Response to their Critics. London: Routledge, pp. 18–41.Google Scholar
Lawson, T (1997) Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, T (2003) Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawson, T (2009) The current economic crisis: its nature and the course of academic economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33(4): 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, RE Jr (1980) Methods and problems in business cycle theory. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 12: 696–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, DN (1986) The Rhetoric of Economics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Mankiw, RG, Taylor, MP (2006) Economics. London: Thomson.Google Scholar
Mercille, M (2014) The role of the media in fiscal consolidation programmes: The case of Ireland. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38(2): 281–300.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P (1989) More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palley, TI, Horn, GA (eds) (2013) Restoring Shared Prosperity: A Policy Agenda from Leading Keynesian Economists. Berlin: Hans Boeckler Foundation. Available: http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_restoring_shared_prosperity.pdf (accessed 29 December 2014).Google Scholar
Parkin, M, Powell, M, Matthews, K (2012) Economics (European edition). 8th ed. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Pigeon, MA (2008) Conflict, consensus, convention: The depoliticization of Canada’s macroeconomic discourse. PhD Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Popper, K (1963) Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reinhart, CM, Rogoff, KS (2010) Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review 100(2): 573–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokeach, M (1960) The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M (2012) The tragedy of UK fiscal policy in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36(1): 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, R (2013) Is economics a science? The Guardian economics blog, 6 November. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/business/economics-blog/2013/nov/06/is-economics-a-science-robert-shiller (accessed 10 June 2014).Google Scholar
Smith, A ([1759] 1976) The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Glasgow edition; ed Raphael, DD, Macfie, A). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A ([1762–1763] 1983) Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (ed Bryce, JC). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A ([1795] 1980) The history of astronomy. In: Wightman, WLD (ed.) Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–105.Google Scholar
Stretton, P (1969) The Political Sciences: General Principles of Selection in Social Science and History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Von Hayek, FA ([1974] 1989) The pretence of knowledge: Nobel memorial lecture. American Economic Review 79(6): 3–7.Google Scholar