Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:45:29.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Post Keynesian Perspective on Industry Assistance and the Effectiveness of Australia’s Carbon Pricing Scheme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Neil Perry
Neil Perry*
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Australia’s carbon pricing scheme protects the profits of polluters and, as a consequence, has a negligible impact on the carbon emissions emanating from Australian industries. I concentrate on the assistance given to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industries and use a post Keynesian approach to explain that, despite the rhetoric, industries and firms will not move offshore under a carbon price and industry assistance is unnecessary. When assistance is given, profits are protected and could increase in certain industries, which occurred in the comparable European emissions trading scheme. In orthodox economic theory, despite this negligible impact on profits, any method of pricing carbon causes a reduction in emissions because firms seek to adjust technology and factor inputs at the margin and abate until marginal abatement costs equal the carbon price. However, from a post Keynesian perspective, the government’s prediction of a transformed economy and clean energy future will not occur unless the carbon pricing policy reduces the corporate profits of emitting firms. Thus, complementary policies are required to take the burden of reducing emissions off the more symbolic carbon market established. I further argue that a carbon tax without any industry assistance is a preferred approach and that where plant shutdown does occur, carbon emissions around the world will fall and workers could be compensated at a far smaller cost than the adjustment assistance given to industries in the policy’s current form.

Keywords

B50Q54Q58Carbon priceindustry assistanceKaleckimark-up pricingpost Keynesian economicsSalterprofits
Type
Symposium
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 23 , Issue 1: Carbon Markets: Inherent Limitations and Complementary Policies , February 2012 , pp. 47 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012

References

Alumina Limited (2010) Annual Report: 2010, available: http://www.aluminalimited.com/uploads/File/ASX%20announcement%202010-12%20Annual%20Report.pdf [accessed 27 December 2011].Google Scholar
Australian Aluminium Council (2009) Media Release: Government issues a major thRET to Australia’s aluminium industry, available: http://aluminium.org.au/_webapp_467468/Government_issues_a_major_thRET_to_Australia’s_aluminium_industry [accessed 22 January 2012].Google Scholar
Asimakopulos, A. (1988 [1975]) ‘A Kaleckian theory of income distribution’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 8, pp. 313–333, reprinted in Sawyer, M.C. (ed.) Post-Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecker, R. A. (1999) ‘Kaleckian macro models for open economies’ in Deprez, J., Harvey, J. T. (eds) Foundations of International Economics: Post Keynesian Perspectives, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 116–149.Google Scholar
Bloch, H. (2000) ‘Steindl’s contribution to the theory of industry concentration’, Australian Economic Papers, 92, pp. 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, H. (2006) ‘Steindl on imperfect competition: The role of technical change’, Metroeconomica, 57(3), pp. 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, B., Lounkaew, K. (2011) How many jobs is 23,510, really? Recasting the mining job loss debate, The Australia Institute, Technical Brief No. 9, June, available: http://www.apo.org.au/research/how-many-jobs-23510-really-recasting-mining-job-loss-debate [accessed 20 July 2011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coorey, P. (2011) ‘Gillard’s carbon hopes up in smoke’, Sydney Morning Herald, 16 April, available: http://m.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/gillards-carbon-hopes-up-in-smoke-20110415-1dhwc.html [accessed 15 May 2011].Google Scholar
Courvisanos, J. (2003) ‘Innovation’ in King, J.E. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, pp. 191–196.Google Scholar
Courvisanos, J. (2011) ‘Political aspects of innovation in an ecologically unsustainable world’, The Journal of Economic Analysis, 2(1), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Courvisanos, J., Laramie, A. J., Mair, D. (2009) ‘Tax policy and innovation: A search for common ground’, Intervention: European Journal of economics and Economic Policies, 6(2), pp. 271–287.Google Scholar
Daly, J., Edis, T. (2010a) Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Detailed Analysis, Gratton Institute Report 2010-2, April, available: http://www.grattan.edu.au/pub_page/report_energy1.html [accessed 15 May 2011].Google Scholar
Daly, J., Edis, T. (2010b) Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Main Report, Gratton Institute Report 2010-2, April. available: http://www.grattan.edu.au/publications/026_energy_report_22_april_2010.pdf [accessed 15 May 2011].Google Scholar
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (2011) Securing a Clean Energy Future: The Australian Government’s Climate Change Plan, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, available: http://www.cleanenergyfuture.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Consolidated-Final.pdf [accessed 24 August 2011].Google Scholar
Fyfe, M. (2011) ‘Is this man’s job really under threat?’, The Age, 17 April, available: http://m.theage.com.au/national/is-this-mans-job-really-under-threat-20110416-1divy.html [accessed 15 May 2011].Google Scholar
Garnaut, R. (2008) The Garnaut Climate Change Review: Final Report, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Grubb, M., Neuhoff, K. (2006) ‘Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: Policy overview’, Climate Policy, 6(1), pp. 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, C., Grubb, M., Neuhoff, K., Matthes, F., Tse, M. (2006) ‘Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: How and why?’, Climate Policy, 6(1), pp. 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalecki, M. (1971 [1937]) ‘Entrepreneurial capital and investment’, reprinted in Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy: 1933–1970, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 105–109.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. (1971 [1971]) ‘Class struggle and distribution of national income’, reprinted in Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy: 1933–1970, Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–164.Google Scholar
Kenyon, P. (1979) ‘Pricing’ in Eichner, A. S. (ed.) A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics, Macmillan, London, pp. 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kregel, J. A. (1979) ‘Income distribution’ in Eichner, A. S. (ed.) A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics, Macmillan, London, pp. 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronenberg, T. (2010) ‘Finding common ground between ecological economics and post-Keynesian economics’, Ecological Economics, 69, pp. 1488–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, M. (2007) Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Lee, F. S. (2003) ‘Pricing and prices’ in King, J. E. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics,: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, pp. 285–289.Google Scholar
Martinez, K. K., Neuhoff, K. (2005) ‘Allocation of carbon emission certificates in the power sector: How generators profit from grandfathered rights’, Climate Policy, 5(1), pp. 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, N. (2010) A post Keynesian theory of environmental taxes, Paper presented at the Ninth Australian Society of Heterodox Economics Conference, 6–7 December, The University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
Pressman, S. (2007) ‘Economic power, the state, and post-Keynesian economics’, International Journal of Political Economy, 35(4), pp. 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, W. E. G. (1966) Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge University Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M. C. (1985) The Economics of Michal Kalecki, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smale, R., Hartley, M., Hepburn, C., Ward, J., Grubb, M. (2006) ‘The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices’, Climate Policy, 6(1), pp. 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spash, C. L. (2010) ‘The brave new world of carbon trading’, New Political Economy, 15(2), pp. 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steindl, J. (1952) Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism, Monthly Review Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Turton, H. (2002) The Aluminium Smelting Industry: Structure, Market Power, Subsidies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, The Australia Institute, Discussion Paper No. 44, available: http://www.tai.org.au/documents/dp_fulltext/DP44.pdf [accessed 27 December 2011].Google Scholar
Treasury, (2011) Strong Growth, Low Pollution: Modelling a Carbon Price, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, available: http://www.treasury.gov.au/carbonpricemodelling/content/report.asp [accessed 28 December 2011].Google Scholar
Weintraub, S. (1988 [1981]) ‘An eclectic theory of income shares’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 4, pp. 10–24, reprinted in Saywer, M. C. (ed.) Post-Keyne-sian Economics, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, C., Murphey, M. (2011) ‘Carbon tax: Belligerence, bluffs and poker faces’, Sydney Morning Herald, 16–17 April, available: http://www.smh.com.au/business/carbon-tax-belligerence-bluffs-and-poker-faces-20110415-1dhqg.html [accessed 1 November 2011].Google Scholar