Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-01T17:12:50.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Macroeconomic Policy for Recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Ian M. McDonald*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The major economic problem from which Australia suffers at the present time is an excessively—high rate of unemployment. Australia also appears to have, at present, an excessively—low rate of saving. In contrast to the views of the “minimalists”, who argue that government macroeconomic policy should not be adjusted to offset high rates of unemployment, it is argued in this paper that a policy for recovery is desirable. This argument is based on empirical evidence which suggests that the degree of price flexibility required for the economy to return automatically to full employment does not exist. The appropriate policy for recovery, given the low rate of saving, is an expansionary monetary policy. Indicators of monetary policy do suggest that the current stance of monetary policy is indeed expansionary. It is difficult to say whether an even more expansionary monetary policy should be adopted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1993

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented in a public lecture at the University of Melbourne in 1993, as a lecture in the Dean’s Lecture series. The current version has been updated in the light of more recently available statistics.

References

Maddison, A. (1991) Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-run Comparative View, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
McDonald, I.M. (1993) “Models of the Range of Equilibria”, mimeo University of Melbourne (forthcoming in Cross, R. (ed.)), The Natural Rate Hypothesis Twenty Five Years On, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.).Google Scholar