Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:34:23.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Capabilities in Victoria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Anne Leahy ,
Joanne Loundes ,
Elizabeth Webster  and
Jongsay Yong
Anne Leahy
Affiliation:
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research
Joanne Loundes
Affiliation:
Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Elizabeth Webster
Affiliation:
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research Centre for Microeconometrics, The University of Melbourne
Jongsay Yong
Affiliation:
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research Centre for Microeconometrics, The University of Melbourne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents the key findings from a small qualitative survey of the main factors associated with the creation and usage of five industrial capabilities in leading Victorian sectors. The capabilities included advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT), design, information and communications technology (ICT), biotechnology and environment technologies. Eighty-eight companies and organisations were interviewed for the study. It was found that the main requirements for the successful creation of a capability was the ability of the company to recruit and retain the best graduates from universities and technical schools, the ability to offer training to these graduates and the ability to financially support high and consistent levels of R&D over time. The main requirement for the successful use of a capability was effective company networking, work cultures conducive to excellence, supportive government regulations and the provision of complementary specialised training.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , June 2004 , pp. 74 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2004

Footnotes

*

We thank Rosy Qin, Lara Hammond, and Kerry Ware who undertook to call many companies to arrange for appointments and the many companies executives who made their time available. We also thank officials at the Victorian Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development, especially Tim Sullivan and Megan Vassarotti, for their help in organising the interviews with companies. Finally, thanks are due to Garry Ferris, Lynne Williams, Stein Helgeby, David Hanna, David Adams, Fran Thorn, and Aaron Johnstone helpful suggestions. Views contained in this working paper are solely those of the authors and all responsibility for the content however rests with the authors.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2002) Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 7–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J.D. (1999) The Structure of Firm R&D, the Factor Intensity of Production and Skill Bias, Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, C. (1995) The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, P. (2000) The Economic Role of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: The United States, March 2000.Google Scholar
Autors, D.H., Katz, L.F., Krueger, A.B. (1998) Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1169–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, A. P. (1995) Training, Wage Growth and Job Performance: Evidence from a Company Database, Journal of Labor Economics, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, A. P., Sicherman, N. (1999) Technological Change and Wages: An Interindustry Analysis, Journal of Political Economy, 107, 285–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelsman, E. J., Doms, M. (2000) Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata, Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 569–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelsman, E. J., van Leeuwen, G., Nieuwenhuijsen, H. (1998) Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Finn Performance in the Netherlands, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6, 291–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, E., Bound, J., Machin, S. (1998) Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1245–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, S., Lynch, L. (1997) How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity, In Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, Lonon.Google Scholar
Black, S.E., Lynch, L.M. (1996) Human-Capital Investments and Productivity, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 86, 263–7.Google Scholar
Black, S.E., Lynch, L.M. (2001) How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 434–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, T.F. (1999) Computerization and Wage Dispersion: An Analytical Reinterpretation, Economic Journal, 109, 390–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, T.F., Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M. (2002) Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labour: Firm-Level Evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 339–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruinshoofd, A., Hollanders, H., ter Weel, B. (2001) Knowledge Spillovers and Wage Inequality: An Empirical Analysis of Dutch Manufacturing, Labour, 15, 641–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M. (2000) Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W. M. (1995) Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity, In Stoneman, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Blackwell, Oxford UK & Cambridge USA.Google Scholar
Cohen, W.M., Levin, R.C., Mowery, D.C. (1987) Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination, Journal of Industrial Economics, June, 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P. (2000) Protection Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why Us Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not), In NBER Working Paper Series, Vol. 7552 National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Dearden, L., Reed, H., van Reenen, J. (2000) Who Gains When Workers Train? Training and Corporate Productivity in a Panel of British Industries, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Lonon.Google Scholar
Doms, M., Dunne, T., Troske, K.R. (1997) Workers, Wages, and Technology, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 253–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G. (1988) Sources Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26.Google Scholar
Falk, M., Seim, K. (2001) Workers’ Skill Level and Information Technology: A Censored Regression Model, International Journal of Manpower, 22, 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J. and Krizan, C.J. (2001) Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence, In Hulten, C.R., Dean, E.R. and Harper, M.J. (Eds.), New Developments in Productivity Analysis NBER/University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Haltiwanger, J. (2000) Aggregate Growth: What Have We Learned from Microeconomic Evidence?, OECD Economics Department Working Paper, no. 267.Google Scholar
Hollanders, H., ter Weel, B. (2002) Technology, Knowledge Spillovers and Changes in Employment Structure: Evidence from Six Oecd Countries, Labour Economics, 9, 579–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (2001) Information Technology and the U.S. Economy, American Economic Review, 91, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., Stiroh, K.J. (2000) Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. (1993) How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Micro Data, 1984–1989, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G. (1987) Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, S., van Reenen, J. (1998) Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from Seven OECD Countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1215–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martino, J. and Holden, S. (2001) Unlocking the Barriers: A Regional Perspective of Apprenticeships and Traineeships, In Smart, N. (Ed.), Australian Apprenticeships: Research Readings Australian National Training Authority, Leabrook, SA, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar
Mason, G., van Ark, B. (1994) Vocational Training and Productivity Performance: An Anglo-Dutch Comparison, International Journal of Manpower, 15, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuckin, R.H., Streitwieser, M.L., Doms, M. (1998) The Effect of Technology Use on Productivity Growth, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belnap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass. and London.Google Scholar
Oliner, S.D., Sichel, D.E. (2000) The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Productivity-Commission (1999) Microeconomic Reforms and Australian Productivity: Exploring the Links, Auslnfo, Canberra.Google Scholar
Whelan, K. (2000) Computer, Obsolescence, and Productivity, Federal Reserve Board Working Paper, Finance and Economics Discussion Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar